This article critically examines the global humanitarian innovation movement by conjuncting it with the stem cell biotech sector to trace how in the assemblage of matter and code conflicts emerge about notions of suffering, pain, enhancement as well as markets that alter the very material forms of life and economy. In the first section, I look at two things simultaneously: a bio-humanitarian project—the Cypriot search for and DNA identification of the post-war missing—and clinical trials performed by the biotech corporate sector. I trace their respective methods of value and valuation as not only dependent social molecuralised practices but also as translation technologies of kinship, creation of new notions of life and death and governance. In the second section, I take a close look at the emergence of humanitarian and clinical labour as a global assemblage to show how humanitarian organisations and transnational corporations orient themselves towards certain labour assemblages in the search ‘anywhere’ to learn about, borrow and translate technologies supporting the ‘business’ of empire. I finish with broader theoretical implications of the humanitarian work post war and the clinical labour of patients in stem cell therapies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgathangelouAnna M. (n.d.). Regrets and Remains: The “Missing” and (In) Securities in Cyprus (forthcoming)Theory and Event.
2.
AppaduraiA. (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (Edited Volume). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BarnettMichael. (2005). Humanitarianism transformed. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 723–740.
4.
BarnettMichael. (2009). Evolution without progress? Humanitarianism in a world of hurt. International Organization, 63(4), 621–663.
5.
BarnettMichael, & WeissThomas G. (2008). Humanitarianism in question: Politics, power, ethics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
6.
BirchK. (2015). We have never been neoliberal. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
7.
BirchK. (2016). Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science, Technology & Human Values, 1–31. doi: 10.1177/0162243916661633
8.
BirchK., & TyfieldD. (2013). Theorizing the bioeconomy: Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or … what?Science, Technology and Human Values, 38(3), 299–327.
9.
BoltanskiL., & ChiapelloEve. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London, UK: Verso Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (1993). The field of cultural production. London, UK: Columbia University Press.
11.
BourdieuP., & WacquantLois J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
CassiaP.S. (2006). Guarding Each Other’s Dead, mourning own’s own: The problem of missing persons and missing pasts in Cyprus. South European Society and Politics, 11(1), 111–128.
13.
CodyLisa Forman. (2001). Sex, civility, and the self: Du Coudray, D’Eon, and eighteenth-century conceptions of gendered, national and psychological identity. French Historical Studies, 24(3), 379–407.
14.
CodyLisa Forman. (2005). Birthing the nation: Sex, science, and the conception of eighteenth century Britons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
CooperM. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in neoliberal era. Seattle, USA: University of Washington Press.
16.
CooperM., & WaldbyC. (2014). Clinical labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
CrossJamie, & StreetAlice. (2009). Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today, 25(4), 4–9.
18.
CrosslandZ., & JoyceRosemary A. (2015). Disturbing bodies: Perspectives on forensic anthropology. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
19.
DeleuzeG. (1997). Essays critical and clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Viking Press.
21.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans. MassumiBrian). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
DeleuzeGilles, & ParnetClaire. (2007). Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
DickensonD. (2001). Property and women’s alienation from their own reproductive labour. Bioethics, 15(3), 205–217.
24.
DosseF. (2010). Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari intersecting lives. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
DosseF. (2012). ‘Deleuze and structuralism’. In SmithD.W. & Somers-HallH. (Eds), The Cambridge companion to Deleuze (pp. 126–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ErtürkI., FroudJ., JohalS., LeaverA., & WilliamsK. (2013). (How) do devices matter in finance?Journal of Cultural Economics, 6(3), 336–352.
27.
FarquharJudith F., & KellyJohn. (2013). Commentary: Translation and situation—Science, metabolism, finance. Public Culture, 25(371), 551–557.
28.
FassinDidier (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present (trans. GommeRachel). Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
FranklinS. (2003). Ethical biocapital: New strategies of cell culture. In FranklinSarah & LockMargaret (Eds), Remaking life and death: Toward an anthropology of the biosciences. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
30.
FranklinS. (2006). Embryonic Economies: The Double Reproductive Value of Stem Cells. BioSocieties, 1(1), 71–90.
31.
FranklinSarah, & LockMargaret M. (2003). Animation and cessation: The remaking of life and death. In FranklinSarah & LockMargaret (Eds), Remaking life and death: Toward an anthropology of the biosciences (pp. 1–30). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
32.
GuattariF. (2000). The three ecologies. London: The Athlone Press.
33.
GuattariF., & AlliezE. (1996). Capitalistic systems, structures and processes. In GenoskoG. (Ed.), The Guattari reader (pp. 233–247). Cambridge: Blackwell.
34.
HarveyD. (1990). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
JasanoffS. (2006). Biotechnology and Empire: The Global Power of Seeds and Science. OSIRIS, 21(1), 273–292.
36.
JasanoffS. (2011). Reframing rights: Bioconstitionalism in the genetic age. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
37.
JasanoffS., & KimSang-Hyun. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva, 47(2), 119–146.
38.
KaushikSunder Rajan. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
39.
KovrasI. (2014). Truth recovery and transitional justice: Deferring human rights issues. London and New York: Routledge.
40.
KovrasI. (2013). Explaining Prolonged Silences in Transitional Justice: the Disappeared in Cyprus and Spain. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 730–756.
41.
LapavitsasC. (2011). Theorizing financialization. Work Employment and Society, 25(4), 611–626.
42.
LazzaratoM. (1996). Immaterial labor (trans. ColilliP. & EmeryE.). In HardtM. & VirnoP. (Eds), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 133–147). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
Le CarreJ. (2001). The constant gardener. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
44.
LilleyS., & PapadopoulosD. (2014). Material returns: Cultures of valuation, biofinancialisation and the autonomy of politics. Sociology, 48(5), 972–988.
45.
LoucaidesL. (2011). Is the European court of human rights still a principled court of human rights after the Demopoulos case?Leiden Journal of International Law, 24(2), 435–465.
46.
MartinP.A. (2006). Gene therapy: Expectations and results. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005653.356
47.
MartinP., BrownN., & TurnerA. (2008). Capitalizing hope: The commercial development of umbilical cord blood stem cell banking. New Genetics and Society, 27, 127–143.
48.
MartinR. (2002). Financialization of daily life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
49.
MartinR., RaffertyM., & BryanR. (2008). Financialization, risk and labour. Competition and Change: The Journal of Global Political Economy, 12(2), 121–133.
50.
Peterson. (1999). DNA detectives on divided Cyprus. The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 28May1999, from http://www.csmonitor.com/1999/0528/p6s2.html
51.
PignarreP., & StengersI. (2011). Capitalist sorcery: Breaking the spell. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
52.
PrainsackB., & AronsonJay D. (2015). Forensic DNA databases: Ethical issues. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 339–345.
53.
PrasadA. (2016). Discursive contextures of science: Euro/West-Centrism and science and technology studies. Engaging Science, Technology and Society, 2, 193–207.
RosenblattAdam. (2010). International forensic investigations and the human rights of the dead. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), 921–950.
56.
RosenblattA. (2015). Digging for the disappeared: Forensic science after atrocity. California: Stanford University Press.
57.
SantCassia P. (2005). Bodies of evidence: Burial, memory and the recovery of missing persons in Cyprus. New York: Berghahn Books.
58.
Scott-SmithT. (2016). Humanitarian neophilia: The ‘innovation turn’ and its implications. Third World Quarterly, 37(12), 1–23.
59.
SmithL. (2013). ‘Genetics is a study of faith’: forensic DNA, kinship analysis, and the ethics of care in post-conflict Latin America. Life (UN) LTD: Feminism, bioscience, race. S&F Online, 11(3), 2–4.
60.
StewartJames (1999). The web meets the TV: Users and the innovation of interactive television. In ToscanC. & JensenJ. (Eds) Interactive Television: TV of the future or the future of TV?Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
61.
StyhreA. (2015). Financing life science innovation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
62.
TerranovaT. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 63, 18(2), 33–58.
63.
TicktinM. (2011). How biology travels: A humanitarian trip. Body and Society, 17(2–3), 139–158.
64.
UladagS. (2006). Oysters with the missing pearls: Untold stories about missing persons. Nicosia, Cyprus: IKME Sociopolitical Studies Institute.
65.
WagnerSarah E. (2008). To know where he lies: DNA technology and the search for Srebrenica’s missing. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
WagnerS. (2015). The quandaries of partial and commingled remains: Srebrenica’s missing and Korean War casualties compared. In FerrándizFrancisco and RobbenAntonius, (Eds) Necropolitics: Mass Graves and Exhumations in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
67.
WaldbyC. (2002). Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Public, Environmental & Occupational Health, 6(3), 305–323.
68.
WaldbyC., & MitchellR. (2006). Tissue economies: Blood, organs and cell lines in late capitalism. London: Duke University Press.
69.
WalkerP., & RussCatherine. (2010). Professionalizing the humanitarian sector: A scoping study. London: Enhancing Learning and Research for Humanitarian Assistance, SCF-UK.
70.
WilliamsH. (2004). Death warmed up: The agency of bodies and bones in early Anglo-Saxon cremation rites. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 263–291.
71.
WilliamsJ. (2003). Gilles Deleuze’s difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
72.
ZibechiR. (2010). Dispersing power: Social movement as anti-state forces. Oakland: AK Press.
