This article examines how assemblages of complex types of knowledge and technologies—including algorithmic mathematics, law and accounting, and high-level logistics—have generated complex predatory formations. The complexity of these formations tends to camouflage their predatory character. Further, such formations are systemic in nature. They are not produced by an elementary seizure of power. Predatory formations are often beyond the reach of ordinary policy responses, in good part because they tend to assemble elements of separate domains into novel configurations. The focus here is on one of the more powerful and complex predatory formations, (high) finance. And the effort is to explain how even the most sophisticated financial instruments require certain elementary and brutal steps, resulting in highly degraded socio-economic outcomes. The sub-prime mortgage developed in the early 2000s differentiates itself from the original 1970s concept in that its aim was not to enable access to housing. Its aim was and is to use the actual physical good (the house) to develop an asset-backed security for the financial system itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AalbersM.B. (2008). The financialization of home and the mortgage market crisis. Competition & Change, 12(2), 148–166.
2.
AalbersM.B. (2009). The globalization and Europeanization of mortgage markets. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 389–410.
3.
AalbersM.B. (Ed.). (2012). Subprime cities: The political economy of mortgage markets. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
AneeshA. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
AneeshA. (2009). Global labor: Algocratic modes of organization. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 347–370.
EichengreenB. (2010). Global Imbalances and the Lessons of Bretton Woods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
FisherM.S., & DowneyG. (Eds) (2006). Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
Furman Center for Real Estate & Urban Policy. (2007a). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods. Furman Center. Retrieved 8February2016, from http://furmancenter.org/research/sonychan/2007-report/
11.
Furman Center for Real Estate & Urban Policy. (2007b). New housing data continues to show signs of danger for New York City’s homeowners, Furman Center analysis concludes. Furman Center for Real Estate & Urban Policy, October15. Retrieved 10February2016, from http://furmancenter.org/files/FurmanCenterHMDAAnalysis_000.pdf
12.
GaleanoE. (1997). Open veins of Latin America: Five centuries of the pillage of a continent. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
13.
Globalizations. (2010). Special issue: Globalization and crisis. Globalizations, 7(1–2). Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rglo20/7/1-2
14.
Global Insights, Inc. (2007). The mortgage crisis: Economic and fiscal implications for metro areas. Lexington, MA: United States Conference of Mayors and the Council for the New American City.
15.
GothamK.F. (2006). The secondary circuit of capital reconsidered: Globalization and the US real estate sector. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 231–275.
16.
HammelD., MoosM., KabahiziE., & WylyE. (2009). Cartographies of race and class: Mapping the class-monopoly rents of American subprime mortgage capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 332–354.
17.
IMF. (2008). Chapter 1: Assessing risks to global financial stability. Global financial stability report. Retrieved 8February2016, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/2008/01/PDF/chap1.pdf (reproduced with permission from the International Monetary Fund).
18.
IMF. (2015). Debt relief under the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) initiative. International Monetary Fund factsheet, September17. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/hipc.htm
19.
ImmergluckD. (2011). Foreclosed: High-risk lending, deregulation, and the undermining of America’s mortgage market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Jubilee Debt Campaign UK. (2013). How big is the debt of poor countries?Jubilee Debt Campaign, 2012. Retrieved 10February2016, from http://jubileedebt.org.uk/faqs-2/how-big-is-the-debt-of-poor-countries
21.
Knorr CetinaK., & PredaA. (Eds). (2013). The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
KrippnerG.R. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LangleyP. (2006). Securitising suburbia: The transformation of Anglo-American mortgage finance. Competition & Change, 10(3), 283–299.
24.
MacKenzieD., MuniesaF., & SiuL. (Eds.). (2007). Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
25.
MignoloW. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality, and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449–514.
26.
MilesD. (2007). European economics: Financial innovation and European housing and mortgage markets. Morgan Stanley Research Europe, July 18. Retrieved 8February2016, from http://www.germany-re.com/files/00034800/MS%20Housing%20Report%202007.pdf
27.
NewmanK. (2009). Post-industrial widgets: Capital flows and the production of the urban. International Journal on Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 314–331.
28.
QuijanoA. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1(3), 533–580.
29.
RealtyTrac. (2008). U.S. foreclosure activity increases 75 percent in 2007. RealtyTrac. January30. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/content/press-releases/us-foreclosure-activity-increases-75-percent-in-2007-3604
30.
RealtyTrac. (2009). 2008 year-end foreclosure market report. RealtyTrac. February 5. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/content/news-and-opinion/2008-year-end-foreclosure-market-report-4621
31.
RealtyTrac. (2010). A record 2.8 million properties receive foreclosure notices in 2009. RealtyTrac. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/landing/2009-year-end-foreclosure-report.html
32.
RealtyTrac. (2012). 2011 year-end foreclosure report: foreclosures on the retreat. RealtyTrac. January9. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/news/foreclosure-trends/2011-year-end-foreclosure-report-foreclosures-on-the-retreat/
33.
RealtyTrac. (2013). 1.8 million U.S. properties with foreclosure filings in 2012. RealtyTrac. January14. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/news/foreclosure-trends/1-8-million-u-s-properties-with-foreclosure-filings-in-2012/
34.
RealtyTrac. (2014). 1.4 million U.S. properties with foreclosure filings in 2013 down 26 percent to lowest annual total since 2007. RealtyTrac. January13. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/content/foreclosure-market-report/2013-year-end-us-foreclosure-report-7963
35.
RealtyTrac. (2016). “Nearly 1.1 million U.S. properties with foreclosure filings in 2015, down 3 percent from 2014 to nine-year low. RealtyTrac. January12. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://www.realtytrac.com/news/foreclosure-trends/realtytrac-2015-year-end-u-s-foreclosure-market-report/
36.
SAIS Review. (2009). Special issue on ‘cities’. SAIS Review, 29(1), 1–173.
37.
SassenS. (1982). Recomposition and peripheralization at the core. In DixonM. & JonasS. (Eds), The new nomads: Immigration and change in the international division of labor (pp. 88–100). San Francisco, CA: Synthesis.
38.
SassenS. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (second edition 2001).
39.
SassenS. (2008a). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
SassenS. (2008b). Two stops in today’s new global geographies: Shaping novel labor supplies and employment regimes. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(3), 457–496.
41.
SassenS. (2011). Cities in a World Economy (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
SassenS. (2013). Global finance and its institutional spaces. In CetinaK. Knorr & PredaA. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of the sociology of finance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
SassenS. (2014). Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
44.
SchwartzH. (2009). Subprime nation: American power, global capital, and the housing bubble. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
ShillerR.J. (2008). The subprime solution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
UNDP. (2014). Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. UNDP Human Development Report 2014. Retrieved 9February2016, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf
47.
UNCTAD. (2015). World investment report 2015: Reforming international investment governance. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved 10February2016, from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf
48.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2015). Millennium development goals indicators. United Nations MDG Indicators. Retrieved 10February2016, from http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/SeriesDetail.aspx?srid=655&crid=
49.
U.S. Department of State. (2015). Trafficking in persons report. United States of America Department of State. Retrieved 10February2016, from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/245365.pdf
50.
World Bank. (2015). Global monitoring report 2015/2016: Development goals in an era of demographic change. A World Bank Group Flagship Report. Retrieved from 9February2016http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/pubdocs/publicdoc/2015/10/503001444058224597/Global-Monitoring-Report-2015.pdf
51.
ZaloomC. (2006). Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
