Agricultural researchers work at universities and research institutes. This paper examines how institutional context has affected Kenyan agricultural scientists’ professional lives along several dimensions: Access and use of emerging ICT technologies, professional activities, and scholarly output. It draws upon a unique longitudinal data set in which scientists were interviewed in 2001, 2005, and 2010. The data allow us to follow changes in technology adoption, professional activities, and publications over this critical period of Internet expansion. We found diminishing institutional differences with ICT expansion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamL. (2003). Information and communication technologies in higher education in Africa: Initiatives and challenges. Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 1(1), 195–221.
2.
Asenso-OkyereK., & MekonnenD. (2012). The importance of ICTs in the provision of information for improving agricultural productivity and rural incomes in Africa. African Human Development Report. UNDP Sponsored research Series. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/rba/docs/Working%20Papers/ICT%20Productivity.pdf
3.
BirdS. R. (2011). Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study Approach. Gender, Work, & Organization, 18(2), 202–230.
4.
BollouF., & NgwenyamaO. (2008). Are ICT investments paying off in Africa? An analysis of total factor productivity in six West African countries from 1995 to 2002. Information Technology for Development, 14(4), 294–307.
5.
CardonaM., KretschmerT., & StrobelT. (2013). ICT and productivity: Conclusions from the empirical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3), 109–125.
6.
CasaburiL., KremerM., MullainathanS., & RamrattanR. (2014). Harnessing ICT to increase agricultural production: Evidence from Kenya. Technical report. Retrieved from http://arefiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/filer_public/2014/03/27/casaburi_et_al_ict_agriculture_20140306.pdf
7.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Vol. 1 of The information age: Economy, society and culture. Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
DuqueR. B., YnalvezM., SooryamoorthyR., MbatiaP., DzorgboD. B. S., & ShrumW. (2005). Collaboration paradox scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755–785.
9.
FlahertyK., MurithiF., MulingeW., & NjugunaE. (2010). Kenya: Recent developments in public agricultural research. ASTI-KARI, Country Note. Retrieved 17February2014, from http://www.ifpri.org/publication/kenya-0?print
10.
FriedmanT. (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11.
FuchsC., & HorakE. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25(2), 99–116.
12.
GulbrandsenM. (2011). Research institutes as hybrid organisations: Central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sciences, 44(3), 215–230.
13.
HentenA., FalchM., & AnyimaduA. (2004). Telecommunications Development in Africa: Filling the gap. Telematics and Informatics, 21(1), 1–9.
14.
HowellsJ. R. (1995). Going Global: The use of ICT Networks in Research and Development. Research Policy, 24(2), 169–184.
15.
IrunguK. R. G., MbuguaD., & MuiaJ. (2015). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) attract youth into profitable agriculture in Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 81(1), 24–33.
16.
JackW., RayA., & SuriT. (2013). Transaction networks: Evidence from mobile money in Kenya. The American Economic Review, 103(3), 356–361.
17.
ManfreC., RubinD., AllenA., SummerfieldG., ColversonK., & AkeredoluM. (2013). Reducing the gender gap in agricultural extension and advisory services: How to find the best fit for men and women farmers (Brief No. 2). Modernizing Extension and Advisory Services. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
18.
MatambalyaF., & WolfS. (2001). The role of ICT for the performance of SMEs in East Africa: Empirical evidence from Kenya and Tanzania (Issue Brief No. 42). ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy. Germany: Matambalya & Wolf. University of Bonn.
19.
NapoliP. M., & ObarJ. A. (2013). Mobile leapfrogging and digital divide policy: Assessing the limitations of mobile Internet access (Research Paper No. 2263800). Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper. New York City, USA: Napoli & Obar. Fordham University Schools of Business.
20.
ObijioforL. (2009). Mapping theoretical and practical issues in the relationship between ICTs and Africa’s socioeconomic development. Telematics and Informatics, 26(1), 32–43.
21.
Oyelaran-OyeyinkaB., & AdeyaC. N. (2004). Internet access in Africa: Empirical evidence from Kenya and Nigeria. Telematics and Informatics, 21(1), 67–81.
22.
PondsR., Van OortF. G., & FrenkenK. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science86(3), 423–443.
23.
RagneddaM., & MuschertG. W. (Eds). (2013). The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: Routledge.
24.
RegeR. A., MainaP., KedemiR., & MwangiP. (2009). Enhancing access and exchange of agricultural information in Kenya: The case of Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI). 2nd Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists (IAALD) Africa Chapter. Accra.
25.
SooryamoorthyR., & ShrumW. (2007). Does the internet promote collaboration and productivity? Evidence from the scientific community in South Africa. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 733–751.
26.
WarschauerM. (2004). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.
27.
WolfS. (2001, September). Determinants and impact of ICT use for African SMEs: Implications for rural South Africa. In Center for Development Research (ZEF Bonn). Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies (TIPS), Annual Forum at Misty Hills, Mulderdrift (10–12 Sept. 2001).
28.
XuS., ZhuK., & GibbsJ. (2004). Global technology, local adoption: A cross-country investigation of internet adoption by companies in the United States and China. Electronic Markets, 14(1), 13–24.
