Technology and Science Policies in Transitional Economy: A Case of Turkey

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

(2006). Innovation policy, country session: The Republic of Turkey. Turkey-EU.

(2007). Why Turkey will continue to attract FDI. Emerging Markets Monitor, 13(1), 1–19.

Anlagan

(2005). TÜBİTAK public R&D projects program and research partnerships. Proceedings of International Forum for Technology Management.

Anlağan

. (2005). TÜBİTAK public R&D projects program and research partnerships. Istanbul: Sabancı University.

Appold

S.J.

(2004). Research parks and the location of industrial research laboratories: An analysis of the effectiveness of a policy intervention. Research Policy, 33(2), 225–43.

Arocena

Sutz

(2000). Looking at national systems of innovation from the south. Industry & Innovation (pp. 55–75). Routledge.

Betz

(2003). Managing technological innovation competitive advantage from change. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Cetindamar

(2007). Benchmarking the Turkish business incubators: Supporting innovation through innovative infrastructures. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Portland, OR, United states, 1328–1335.

Cakir

Science and technology strategies Vision (2023). Science and Technology Policy Department, TÜBİTAK.

10.

Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, State Institute of Statistics, Under Secretariat of Treasury.

11.

Chang

Y-C.

(2003). Benefits of co-operation on innovative performance: Evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan. R&D Management, 33: 425–37.

12.

Cho

H-D.

L.J-K.

(2003). The development path of networking capability of catch-up players in Korea’s semiconductor industry. R&D Management, 33, 411–23.

13.

Dora

(1999). Japan: A case study in national systems of innovation. Retrieved from http://wwwistp.murdoch.edu.au/publications/e_public/Case%20Studies_Asia/japan/japan.htm

14.

Cholewa

(1996). 16M DRAM manufacturing cooperation IBM/SIEMENS in Corbeil Essonnes in France. Cambridge, MA, US: IEEE.

15.

Daim

Basoglu

Saritas

Dursun

Gerdsri

(2009). A Comprehensive Review of Turkish Technology Foresight Project. Foresight, 11(1), 21–42.

16.

Elif

Turkey owes its rapid economic growth to increased R&D.

Retrieved 10 October 2010

from http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-217798-turkey-owes-its-rapid-economic-growth-to-increased-rd.html

17.

Eraslan

I.H.

(2004). Macro framework and market growth in the Turkish automobile industry: A demand analysis. European Academy of Management (EURAM) Annual Conference. St. Andrews, UK.

18.

FDI attractiveness of Turkey a comparative analysis. (2004). TÜSİAD and YASED.

19.

Francis

(1987). The countertrade handbook. New York: Quorum.

20.

Freeman

(1987). National system of innovation: The case of Japan technology policy and economics performance: Lessons from Japan. London.

21.

Freeman

(2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—Complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211.

22.

Hanna

Daim

T.U.

(2009). Managing offshore outsourcing in the software industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 27(7), 881–97.

23.

Hayashi

(1990). The Japanese experience in technology: From transfer to self-reliance. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

24.

Hoekman

B.M.

Maskus

K.E.

Saggi

(2005). Transfer of technology to developing countries: Unilateral and multilateral policy options. World Development, 33(10), 1587–1602.

25.

Human Development Report. (2009). United Nations Development Program (UNDP), http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/#P < http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/ >

26.

IBM Corporation. (2007). Annual Report.

Retrieved 31 March 2010

from www.ibm.com

27.

Inzelt

(2004). The evolution of university-industry-government relationship during transition. Research Policy. 33, 974–95.

28.

IEEE-USA. (2006). U.S. Competitiveness and innovation policy.

29.

Jacob

. (2000). From sponsorship to partnership in academy-industry relations. R&D Management, 30, 255–62.

30.

Katz

M.L.

. (1990). R and D cooperation and competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 137–203.

31.

Lin

B-W.

(2003). Technology transfer as technological learning: A source of competitive advantage for firms with limited R&D resources. R&D Management, 33(3): 327–341.

32.

Liu

White

(2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114.

33.

Lundvall

B.A.

(1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

34.

Metcalfe

(1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Stoneman

(Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US): Blackwell Publishers.

35.

Mizikaci

(2006). Higher education in Turkey. Bucharest: CEPES/UNESCO.

36.

MIT and Novartis in new partnership aimed at transforming pharmaceutical manufacturing. MIT News. Retrieved 30 July 2008 from < http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/novartis-0928.html >

37.

Mora-Valentin

Montoro-Sanchez

Guerras-Martin

L.A.

(2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organization. Research Policy, 33, 17–40.

38.

National Innovation System, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) publication. (1997). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf

39.

Nelson

(1993). National system of innovation: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

40.

OECD. (1997). National innovation system. Paris: OECD Publications.

41.

Official TÜBİTAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) website.

Retrieved 25 July 2008

from http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/

42.

Ozcelik

Taymaz

(2004). Does innovativeness mater for international competitiveness in developing countries? The case of Turkish manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 33: 409–27.

43.

Pavitt

(1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and theory. Research Policy.

44.

Reisman

Capar

Aktas

(2004). Turkey’s development: The role of technology transfer. Social Science Research Network. 24 October.

45.

Schauble

Phillips

D.L.

(2004). Talking Turkey. Foreign Affairs.

46.

Technology Development Foundation of Turkey (TTGV);

Retrieved 25 March 2010

from http://www.ttgv.org.tr/en/page.php?id=90

47.

The Turkish Council of Higher Education (YOK).

Retrieved 10 October 2010

from http://www.yok.gov.tr/en/content/view/343/219/

48.

Turkey’s foreign trade 1990–2006: Main developments in Turkey’s foreign trade. (2006). Basin Yayin Enformasyon Genel Mudurlugu: Ankara.

49.

Wernle

Ciferri

(2006). Turkish automobile industry becomes a European powerhouse. Automotive News Europe, 11(7), 24–25.