This article offers a conceptual analysis of two aspects of openness: extended feedback and absorptive capacity in the context of a developing country national innovation system. Extended feedback is defined as the capacity of national agencies, responsible for telecentre development, to learn and share learning about the practices, ideas and information demands of people using their telecentres. This allows for a greater diffusion of knowledge across the national innovation system (NIS). Absorptive capacity is defined as the capacity of users to access and share information and apply it for productive practices. These concepts are used in this article to help explain the ways that social networks can be consolidated and extended, horizontally and vertically, through telecentres in rural Nepal and consequently contribute to social and economic development. The argument is developed that telecentres, providing there is extended feedback at the institutional level and absorptive capacity at both local and central levels, extend access to ‘bridging social capital’. The paper concludes by identifying some potential indicators for monitoring and evaluating the impact of ICT (Information Communication Technologies) using these concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AroraA.FosfuriA.GambardellaA. (2001). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2.
AnheierH.KendallJ. (2002). Trust and the voluntary Sector. British Journal of Sociology, 53(3), 343–62.
BhatnagerS. (2008). (Coordinator) Impact assessment of e-governance projects: A benchmark for the future. Vikalpa, 33(4), October–December, 69–93.
5.
BrouwerR. (2010). The role of the mobile phone in communication networks in Mozambique. Science Technology & Society, 14(1).
6.
CastellsManuel (2001). Information technology and global development. In MullerJohanCloeteNicoBadatShireen (Eds), Challenges of globalisation: South African debates with Manuel Castells (pp. 152–167). Capetown: Maskew Miller Longman Pvt. Ltd.
ChaminadeC.LundvallB.-A.VangJ.JoshepK.J. (2009). Designing innovation policies for development: Towards systemic experimentation-based approach. In LundvallB.-A.JosephK.J.ChaminadeC.VangJ. (Eds), Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries building domestic capabilities in domestic setting. UK: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited.
9.
ChapagainD. (2006). PPP led ICT services in Nepal. Policy Paper 14, Govt. of Nepal/Asian Development Bank. Retrieved 03 May 2008, http://www.mof.gov.np
10.
ChapmanR.SlaymakerT. (2002). ICTs and rural development: Review of the literature, current interventions and opportunities for action’, Working Paper 192, Overseas Development Institute, London. Retrieved 18 May 2008, from http://www.cefe.net/forum/ICT_Rural.pdf
11.
CohenW.LevinthalD. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–52.
12.
CoreaS. (2007). Promoting development through information technology innovation: The IT artefact, artfulness and articulation. Information Technology for Development, 13(1), 49–69.
13.
FreemanC. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
14.
FagerbergJ.SrholecM. (2009). Innovation systems technology and development: Unpacking the relationships. In LundvallBengt-AkeJosephK.J.ChaminadeCristinaVangJan (Eds), Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15.
FukuyamaF. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and reconstitution of social order. New York: The Free Press.
16.
GoranssonB. (2005). Harnessing information and communication technologies for development in Laos. A report, Research Policy Institute, Lunds Universitet, Laos.
17.
GhimireAtma (2009–2011). Fieldwork undertaken for doctoral studies, Library copy lodged at University of Western Sydney, 2012.
18.
HarrisR. (2001). ‘Telecenters in rural Asia: Towards a success model’, Conference Proceedings of International conference on Information Technology, Communications and Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
19.
HarrissR.PonthaguntaS.SahJ.ShresthaD. (2003). Rural development with ICTs in Nepal: Integrating national policy with grassroots resourcefulness. EJISDC, 12(4), 1–12.
20.
HeeksR. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33.
21.
HudsonH.E. (2006). From rural village to global village: Telecommunications for development in the information age. New York, Routledge.
22.
JainAshok. (2003). From digital divide to digital provide: The subaltern ICT stream in India. In BrandtDietrich (Ed.), Navigating innovations: Indo-European cross-cultural experiences Vol. II, Shaping information and communication technologies for regional development, (pp. 149–160). New Delhi, India: India Research Press.
23.
JalaliA. (2006). The socio economic impact of ICTs in rural Iran. A Research Report, UNESCO and VSP. Retrieved 18 May 2008, from http://www.unesco.org
24.
KenistonK. (2003). Introduction. In KenistonKenethKumarDeepak (Eds), The four digital divides. New Delhi: SAGE.
25.
KenistonK.KumarD. (2004). IT experience in India: Bridging the digital divide. New Delhi: SAGE.
26.
KumarR. (2004). eChoupals: A study on the financial sustainability of village internet centers in rural Madhya Pradesh. Information Technologies and International Development2(1), Fall, 45–73.
27.
LakhaniK.I.JeppersonL.P.PanettaJ. (2007). The value of openness in scientific problem solving. Havard Business School Working Paper 07-50.
28.
LundvallB-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
29.
LundvallB-Å. (Ed.). (2002). Innovation growth and social cohesion: The Danish model. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
30.
Bengt-AkelLundvalJosephK.J.ChaminadeC.VangJ. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
31.
MESCT (Minstry of Higher Education, Science and Technology). (2003). Comissão para a Formulação da Política de Ciência e Tecnologia, Ministerial Report, Maputo.
32.
NarayanD.PritchettL. (1999). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(4), 871–897.
33.
NelsonR.R. (1993). National innovation system: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
NiosiJ. (2010). Rethinking science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions in developing countries. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12, 250–268.
35.
OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris; OECD.
36.
PatelP.PavittK. (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems.STI Review, No. 14, OECD, Paris.
RajalekshmiK. (2008). E-governance services through telecenters: The role of human intermediary and issues of trust. Information Technologies and International Development, 4, 19–35.
39.
RomanR. (2004). Diffusion of innovations as a theoretical framework for telecentres. Information Technologies and Information Development, 1(2), 53–66.
40.
SmithM.EnglerN.J.ChristianG.DigaK.RashidA.Flynn-DapaahK. (2008). Open ICT4D(working draft).
41.
SorianoC.R. (2007). Exploring the ICT and rural poverty reduction link: Community telecentres and rural livelihoods in Wu’an, China. EJISDC, 32(1), 1–15.
42.
TurpinT.Martinez-FernandezC. (2006). Riding the waves of policy: The ‘new production of knowledge and implications for developing economies’. In CartonMichelMeyerJean-Baptiste (Eds), The Knowledge Society: Trompe-L’oeil or Accurate. Paris: l’Harmattan.
43.
TurpinT.CooperR. (2005). Technology, adaptation, and public policy in developing countries: The ‘ins and outs’ of the digital divide, a review essay. Minerva, 43(December), 419–427.
