Discourses about immunological structure have been historically productive in both the biological sciences and in political theory. In this article I argue that a deeper historical structure underlies both kinds of discourse and I attempt to draw some implications from this in relation to the current state of biomedical research in Singapore. Taking the establishment of Singapore’s dedicated biomedical research institution, Biopolis, as a starting point, the article raises several questions: the first concerns the role of biomedical research in Singapore in relation to its larger political economy; the second concerns the relationship between Asian bioscience in relation to international trends; the third concerns the deeper historical structures that, as I will argue, underlie the contemporary situation. After discussing the role of Biopolis in Singapore I outline some theoretical considerations towards an understanding of the kinds of immunological structure that characterize the relations discussed in the first part. I argue that the structure of relations might be understood as auto-immunological (or self-immunizing) and in making the case I draw selectively on disparate fields: mathematics, biology and philosophy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoTheodorHorkheimerMax. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments, trans. NoerrGunzelin Schmid. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2.
AllenGraham. (2006). What kind of body is speaking here?: The pupils of the university, Parallax, 12(3), 1–7.
BatailleGeorges. (1985). Visions of excess: Selected writings, 1927–1939, trans. StoeklAlan, with LovittCarlLeslieDonald M.Jr.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
BatailleGeorges. (1991). The accursed share (Vol. 1), trans. HurleyRobert. New York: Zone Books.
7.
BaudrillardJean. (2006). Utopia deferred: Writings from Utopie (1969–1978). New York: Semiotext(e).
8.
BaudrillardJean. (2005). The intelligence of evil or the lucidity pact., trans. TurnerChris. Oxford: Berg.
ClanceyGregory K. (2012). ‘Intelligent Island to Biopolis: Smart minds, sick bodies and millennial turns in Singapore’. Science, Technology and Society (this issue).
12.
Cohen, Ed. (2009). A body worth defending: Immunity, biopolitics, and the apotheosis of the modern body. Durham: Duke University Press.
13.
ClarkWilliam R. (2008). In defence of self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
DerridaJacques. (1978). ‘From restricted to general economy: A Hegelianism without reserve’. In DerridaJacquesVattimoGianni. (Eds). Writing and Difference (pp. 251–77), trans. BassAlan. London: Routledge.
15.
DerridaJacques. (1982), ‘Différance’. In Margins of Philosophy (pp. 1–28), trans. BassAlan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DerridaJacques. (1983). ‘The principle of reason: The university in the eyes of its pupils’, trans. PorterCatherineMorrisEdward P.Diacritics, 13(3), 3–20.
17.
DerridaJacques. (1984). ‘My chances/Mes chances: A rendezvous with some epicurean stereophonies’. In SmithJoseph H.KerriganWilliam (Eds), Taking Chances: Derrida, Psychoanalysis, and Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
DerridaJacques. (1998). ‘Faith and knowledge: The two sources of “religion” at the limits of reason alone’. In DerridaJacquesVattimoGianni (Eds), Religion (pp. 1–78). London: Polity.
19.
DerridaJacques. (2003). ‘Autoimmunity: Real and symbolic suicides’, trans. BraultPascale-AnneNaasMichael. In BorradoriGiovanna (Ed.), Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
DwyerJohn. (1993). The body at war: The story of our immune system. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
21.
EdwardsPaul N. (2003). ‘Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems’. In MisaThomas J.BreyPhilipFeenbergAndrew (Eds), Modernity and technology (pp. 185–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
EhrlichPaul. (1910). Studies in immunity, trans. BolduanCharles. New York: John Wiley.
23.
EspositoRoberto. (2009). Communitas: The origin and destiny of community, trans. CampbellTimothy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24.
FloridaRichardGuldenTimMellanderCharlotte. (2008). ‘The rise of the mega-region’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 459–76.
25.
GelfertAxel. (2012). ‘Nanotechnology as ideology: Towards a critical theory of “converging technologies”’. Science, Technology, and Society (this issue).
26.
GelfertAxel. (forthcoming). ‘Before Biopolis: Representations of the biotechnology discourse in Singapore’, East-Asian Science, Technology, and Society (forthcoming).
27.
GerwitzDavid. (2007). Apoptosis, senscence and cancer. Totoya, New Jersey: Humanities.
28.
HarmanGraham. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Prahran: Re-Press.
29.
HeideggerM. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays, trans. LovittW.New York: Harper and Row.
30.
HenricusSorelle. (2011). ‘Mapping the DNA of Singapore through its cityscape: Asia’s model science city’. Paper presented at Workshop, ‘Asian Biopoleis: Biotechnology and Biomedicine as Emergent Forms of Life and Practice’, 6 January 2011, Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
31.
HuoJXuS.GuoK.ZengQ.LamK-P. (2009). ‘Genetic deletion of faim reveals its role in modulating c-FLIP expression during CD95-mediated apoptosis of lymphocytes and hepatocytes’. Cell Death and Differentiation, 16(7), 1062–70.
32.
KoolhaasRem. (1995). ‘Singapore songlines: Portrait of a Potemkin metropolis … or thirty years of Tabula Rasa’. In KoolhaasRemMauBruce (Eds), S, M, L, XL. New York and Cologne: Taschen.
33.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35.
LevySteven. (2010). Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. Cambridge: O’Reilly.
36.
LimSiew Wai William. (2004). Have you been shanghaied? Culture And urbanism in glocalized Shanghai, Singapore: Asian Urban Lab.
37.
LyotardJean-François. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, trans. MassumiBrian. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
38.
LyotardJean-François. (1986). Le postmoderne expliqué aux enfants. Paris: Galilée.
39.
MandelbrotBenoit. (1961). ‘On the theory of word frequencies and on related Markovian models of discourse’. In JakobsonR. (Ed.), Structures of language and its mathematical aspects. NewYork: American Mathematical Society.
40.
MandelbrotBenoit. (1963a). ‘Stable paretian income distribution when the apparent exponent is near zero’. International Economic Review, 4(1), 111–15.
41.
MandelbrotBenoit. (1963b). ‘The variation of certain speculative stock prices’. Journal of Business, 36(4), 394–419.
42.
MandelbrotBenoit. (1963c). ‘New methods in statistical analysis’. Journal of Political Economy, 71(5), 421–40.
43.
MandelbrotBenoit. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman.
44.
MaussMarcel. (1958). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies, trans. CunnisonI.London: Cohen and West.
45.
PertierraRaul. (2005). ‘Mobile phones, identity and discursive intimacy’. Human Technology, 1(1), 23–44.
46.
PottenC.S.WilsonJames W. (Eds). (2004). Apoptosis: The life and death of cells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
RobertsonRoland. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
48.
SarasinPhilipp. (2006). Anthrax: Bioterror as fact and fantasy. Cambridge: Harvard.
49.
SimondonGilbert. (1958/1980). On the mode of existence of technical objects, trans. MelamphyNinian. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
50.
SojaEdward. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. New York: Blackwell.
51.
StieglerBernard. (2003). Technics and time, 1: The fault of epimetheus, trans. CollinsGeorgeBeardsworthRichard. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
52.
StieglerBernard. (2010). Technics and time, 2: Disorientation, trans. BarkerStephen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
53.
StieglerBernard. (2011). Technics and time, 3: Cinematic time and the question of malaise, trans. BarkerStephen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
54.
SwyngedouwErik. (2004). ‘Globalisation or “glocalisation”? Networks, territories and rescaling’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48.
55.
TauberAlfred I. (1994). The immune self: Theory or metaphor?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
TauberAlfred I. (2007). ‘Historical and philosophical perspectives concerning immune cognition’. Journal of the History of Biology, 30: 419–40.
57.
WaldbyCatherine. (2009). ‘Singapore Biopolis: Bare life in the city–state’. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 3(2–3), 367–83.
58.
YamadaTadatakaPowellDon W. (2011). Textbook of gastroenterology. New York: Wiley.
