Public Understanding of Science (PUS) is a field of activity and an area of social research. The evolution of this field comprises both the changing discourse and the substantive evidence of a changing public understanding.1 In the first part, I will present a short account on how the discourse of PUS moved from Literacy, via PUS, to Science-in-Society. This is less a story of progress, but one of false polemics and the multiplication of concerns. In the second part, I will show some empirical evidence on how PUS has changed by drawing on mass media data and large scale comparative survey evidence. I conclude by stressing that the Science-Society relationship is variable both in distance between science and the wider society and in the quality of this relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauer, M.W. (1998), ‘ The Medicalisation of Science News: From the “Rocket-scalpel” to the “Gene-meteorite” Complex ’, Social Science Information, 37(1), pp. 731–51 .
2.
Bauer, M.W. (2007), ‘ The Public Career of “Genes”—Trends in Public Sentiment from 1946 to 2002 ’, New Genetics and Society, 26(1), pp. 29–45 .
3.
Bauer, M.W. (2008a), ‘Survey Research and the Public Understanding of Science’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge , pp. 111–30.
4.
Bauer, M.W. (2008b), ‘Paradigm Change for Science Communication: Commercial Science Needs a Critical Public’, in D. Cheng , M. Claessens , T. Gascoigne , J. Metcalfe , B. Schiele and S. Shi (eds), Science Communication in Social Context, Chapter 1. New York: PCST/Springer , pp. 7–25.
5.
Bauer, M. , J. Durant and G. Evans (1994), ‘ European Public Perceptions of Science ’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(2), pp. 163–86 .
6.
Bauer, M.W. and J. Gregory (2007), ‘From Journalism to Corporate Communication in Post-war Britain’, in M. W. Bauer and M. Bucchi (eds), Science, Journalism and Society: Science Communication Between News and Public Relations. London: Routledge , pp. 33–52.
7.
Bauer, M.W. , K. Petkova , P. Boyadjieva and G. Gornev (2006), ‘ Long-term Trends in the Representations of Science Across the Iron Curtain: Britain and Bulgaria, 1946–95 ’, Social Studies of Science, 36(1), pp. 97–129 .
8.
Bauer, M.W. , N. Allum and S. Miller (2007a), ‘ What Have We Learnt From 25 Years of PUS Research—Liberating and Widening the Agenda? ’ Public Understanding of Science, 15(1), pp. 1–17 .
9.
Bauer, M.W. , R. Shukla and N. Allum (2007b), ‘ International Indicators of Science and the Public ’, Technical Summary of the Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the Royal Society, London, LSE, 5–6 November 2007. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/socialpsychology/events/seminars/2007–08/SummaryRoyalSocietyws2007_PUS.pdf, accessed 15 June 2008.
10.
Bauer M. , R. Shukla and P. Kakkar (2008), ‘The Integrated Data on Public Understanding of Science [EB_PUS_1989–2005], Codebook and Un-weighted Frequency Distributions’, London and Delhi, LSE & NCAER , November.
11.
Fleck, L. (1979 [1935]), Entstehung Einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp .
12.
Gaskell, G. and M.W. Bauer (eds) (2006), Genomic and Society. Legal, Ethical and Social Dimensions. London: Earthscan .
13.
Haldane, J.B.S. (1925), Daedalus, or Science and the Future. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co .
14.
Luckmann, T. (1995), ‘ Der kommunikative Aufbau der sozialen Welt und der Sozial-wissenschaften ’, Annali de Sociologia, 11(1), pp. 45–71 .
15.
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2006), Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: OECD .
16.
Raza, G. , S. Singh and B. Dutt (2002), ‘ Public, Science and Cultural Distance ’, Science Communicaiton, 23(3), pp. 292–309 .
17.
Shukla, R. and M.W. Bauer (2007), ‘Science Culture Index—Construction and Validation’, Concept paper. London and Delhi: LSE and NCAER .
18.
Weingart, P. (2001), ‘The Loss of Distance: Science in Transition’, in G. E. Allen and R.M. MacLeod (eds), Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn. Amsterdam: Kluver Academic Publishers , pp. 167–84.
19.
Wynne, B. (1993), ‘ Public Uptake of Science: A Case for Institutional Reflexivity ’, Public Understanding of Science, 2(3), pp. 321–38 .
