The study examined geography teachers’ perspectives on integrating controversial topics into the curriculum. Teachers were asked to write essays on why they should not fear addressing political and value-based issues in their lessons. The research found that most teachers agreed on the benefits of discussing controversial issues, such as fostering critical thinking and emotional management, while emphasizing the use of reliable information. However, opinions differed on whether teachers should share their personal views during these discussions, with some advocating for neutrality. The study highlighted two primary barriers: the significant time needed for preparation and the lack of methodological support. Teachers also expressed concerns about potential conflicts with colleagues, parents or school administration, which contribute to their reluctance to engage in such discussions. Despite these challenges, there was a consensus that controversial issues should be included in geography education to better prepare students for the complex real-world problems they will face.
AlbeV. (2009). Enseigner des controverses. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
2.
Aldrich-MoodieB., & KwongJ. (1997). Environmental education. The Institute of Economic Affairs.
3.
AnkerT., & Von der LippeM. (2018). Controversial issues in religious education: How teachers deal with terrorism in their teaching. Researching Religious Education: Classroom Processes and Outcomes, 131–143.
4.
ArendtH. (1998). The human condition. The University of Chicago Press.
5.
BaileyC. (1975). Neutrality and rationality in teaching. In BridgesD. & ScrimshawP. (Eds), Values and authority in schools (pp. 124–132). Hodder and Stoughton.
6.
BrinkleyE. H. (1999). Caught off guard: Teachers rethinking censorship and controversy. Allyn and Bacon.
7.
British Historical Association. (2007). T.E.A.C.H. Teaching emotive and controversial history. The Historical Association.
8.
ByfordJ., LennonS., & RussellW. B. (2009). Teaching controversial issues in the social studies: A research study of high school teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.4.165-170
9.
CharlickS. J., FielderA., PincombeJ., & McKellarL. (2017). ‘Determined to breastfeed’: A case study of exclusive breastfeeding using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Women and Birth, 30(4), 325–331.
10.
ChikokoV., GilmourJ. D., HarberC., & SerfJ. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5–19.
11.
ClarkeP. (2000). Teaching controversial issues. Green Teacher, 62, 29–32.
12.
CottonD. R. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: Neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241.
13.
CreswellJ. W., & PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
14.
DeardenR. F. (1981). Controversial issues and the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 37–44.
15.
EisnerE. W. (2002). The educational Imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
16.
ErsoyA. F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates’ views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 323–334.
17.
EvansR. W., AveryP. G., & PedersonP. V. (2000). Taboo topics: Cultural restraint on teaching social issues. The Clearing House, 73(5), 295–302.
18.
EzzedeenS. R. (2008). Facilitating class discussions around current and controversial issues: Ten recommendations for teachers. College Teaching, 56(4), 230–236.
19.
FangZ. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
20.
FloroM. (2011). Développement durable et questions socialement vives – Une approche territorialisée du discours enseignant. In LegardezA. & SimonneauxL. (Eds), Développement durable et autres questions d’actualité: Questions socialement vives dans l’enseignement et la formation (pp. 163–179). Éducagri éditions.
21.
FlowerdayT., & SchrawG. (2000). Teacher beliefs about instructional choice: A phenomenological study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 634.
22.
HeimbergC. (2011). Vers une pédagogie des mémoires – Histoires, mémoires et intelligibilité des sociétés. In LegardezA. & SimonneauxL. (Eds), Développement durable et autres questions d’actualité: Questions socialement vives dans l’enseignement et la formation (pp. 233–247). Éducagri éditions.
23.
HessD. E. (2005). How do teachers’ political views influence teaching about controversial issues? Social Education, 69(1), 47.
24.
HoL. C., McAvoyP., HessD., & GibbsB. (2017). Teaching and learning about controversial issues and topics in the social studies: A review of the research. In ManfraM. M. & BolickC. M. (Eds), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 319–335). Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
HoL. C., & SeowT. (2015). Teaching controversial issues in geography: Climate change education in Singaporean schools. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 314–344.
26.
KellyT. E. (1989). Leading class discussions of controversial issues. Social Education, 53(6), 368–370.
27.
KhandkarS. H. (2009). Open coding. University of Calgary.
28.
KingJ. T. (2009). Teaching and learning about controversial issues: Lessons from Northern Ireland. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37(2), 215–246.
29.
LévyJ. (2013). Espace public. In LevyJ. & LussaultM. (Eds), Dictionnaire de la géographie [et de l’espace des sociétés] (pp. 364–367). Belin.
30.
LupatiniM. (2018). Controversies on public space management projects in Geography teaching to educate pupils as dynamic citizens. Area, 51(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12523
31.
LussaultM. (2009). De la lutte des classes à la lutte des places (p. 27). Grasset.
32.
McDermottP., & LanahanB. K. (2012). Democracy and social justice in Sarajevo’s schools. Qualitative Report, 17, 22.
33.
McPartlandM. (2006). Strategies for approaching values education. In BalderstoneD. (Ed.), Secondary geography handbook. The Geographical Association.
34.
MiscoT. (2012). The importance of context for teaching controversial issues in international settings. International Education, 42(1), 5.
35.
MorganJ. (2011). What is radical in school geography today? InForum, 53(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.2304
36.
MowlG., & PainR. (1995). Using self and peer assessment to improve students’ essay writing: A case study from geography. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(4), 324–335.
37.
NgangaL., RobertsA., KambutuJ., & JamesJ. (2020). Examining pre-service teachers’ preparedness and perceptions about teaching controversial issues in social studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 77–90.
38.
OultonC., & DayV. (2004). Controversial issues: Teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973
39.
PaquotT. (2006). Espace public. In PumainD., PaquotT. & KleinschmalerR. (Eds), Dictionnaire, la ville et l’urbain (pp. 107–109). Economica.
40.
PaquotT. (2009). L’espace public. La Découverte.
41.
PollakI., SegalA., LefsteinA., & MeshulamA. (2018). Teaching controversial issues in a fragile democracy: Defusing deliberation in Israeli primary classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(3), 387–409.
42.
PutalováL., & OsvaldL. a kol. (2021). Deti a mládež v informačnom prostredí. Človek v ohrození, n. o.
43.
RandjelovicP., StojiljkovicN., RadulovicN., StojanovicN., & IlicI. (2021). Problematic smartphone use, screen time and chronotype correlations in university students. European Addiction Research, 27(1), 67–74.
44.
ScarrattE., & DavisonJ. (2012). Media education: politics and policy. In The media teacher's handbook (pp. 9–24). Routledge.
45.
ShusterK. (2009). Civil discourse in the classroom, p. 23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541263
46.
SoleyM. E. (1996). Teaching about international conflict and peace. Social Education, 60(7), 432–438.
47.
StaeheliL. A. (2011). Political geography: Where’s citizenship?Progress in Human Geography, 35, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510370671
48.
StaeheliL. A., & MitchellD. (2008). The people property? Power, politics, and the public. Routledge.
49.
StradlingB. (1985). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Bulletin of Environmental Education, 170, 9–13.
50.
SuenA. (2017). Teaching taboo topics: Why it matters and how to pull it off. Teaching Philosophy. Iona College.
51.
TuckmanB. W. (1993). The essay test: A look at the advantages and disadvantages. Nassp Bulletin, 77(555), 20–26.
52.
Tutiaux-GuillonN. (2006). Le difficile enseignement des ‘questions vives’ en histoire-géographie. In LegardezA. & SimonneauxL. (Eds), L’école à l’épreuve de l’actualité: enseigner les questions vives (pp. 119–135). ESF.
53.
VanManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
54.
WarrenL. (2007). Managing hot moments in the classroom. Derek Bok Center, Harvard University. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/resources/Teaching/CourseDesign/InstructionalStrategies/HotMomentsClassroom.pdf
