Based on the moral foundations theory and the social intuitionist model, in our 10-day diary study, we investigated how moral foundations predict the generalized, everyday prosocial intentions to donate coins or time to others. We conducted the study twice in Poland on the same sample: Wave 1 in December 2022/February 2023 and then Wave 2 one year later. Our approach allowed us to test whether the pattern of predictors remains stable over time, or whether it depends on the socio-political context in which people respond to environmental cues (in our case, the questions about the propensity to help). N = 74 people aged 18–55 completed both waves of the study. Our results showed that the moral foundation of purity/sanctity was the only moral foundation related to prosocial intentions to donate coins (at both waves) and time (at wave 1), suggesting its particular role in the case of self-reported behaviour. We discuss the findings in relation to the role of context in the activation of moral foundations and the role of congruence with social expectations in the display of prosociality.
AkninL. B., WhillansA. V., NortonM. I., & DunnE. W. (2019). Happiness and prosocial behavior: An evaluation of the evidence. In HelliwellJ. F., LayardR. & SachsJ. D. (Eds), World happiness report 2019 (pp. 67–86). Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
BekkersR. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369–381.
4.
ByrskaO. (2023). Civil crisis management in Poland: The first weeks of the relief in Russian war on Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research, 25(3–4), 463–470.
5.
CantrilH. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press.
6.
CapraraG. V., & StecaP. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self–efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26(2), 218–239.
7.
ClarkC. B., SwailsJ. A., PontinenH. M., BowermanS. E., KrizK. A., & HendricksP. S. (2017). A behavioral economic assessment of individualizing versus binding moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 49–54.
8.
DayM. V., FiskeS. T., DowningE. L., & TrailT. E. (2014). Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1559–1573.
9.
De la BarreS., StoneG., McKeownJ., & SchroederJ. (2020). Thinking about leisure during a global pandemic. World Leisure Journal, 62(4), 306–310.
10.
DunganJ. A., ChakroffA., & YoungL. (2017). The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions. PLoS One, 12(3), e0173405.
11.
EinolfC. J. (2013). Daily spiritual experiences and prosocial behavior. Social Indicators Research, 110, 71–87.
12.
FeinbergM., & WillerR. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62.
13.
GeldhofG. J., PreacherK. J., & ZyphurM. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91.
14.
Gil-LacruzA. I., MarcuelloC., & Saz-GilM. I. (2019). Gender differences in European volunteer rates. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 127–144.
15.
GrahamJ., HaidtJ., & NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
16.
GrahamJ., NosekB. A., HaidtJ., IyerR., KolevaS., & DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
17.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
18.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
19.
HaidtJ. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 281–297.
20.
HaidtJ., & GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.
HuiB. P., NgJ. C., BerzaghiE., Cunningham-AmosL. A., & KoganA. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(12), 1084–1116.
23.
JancenelleV. E., & JavalgiR. R. G. (2018). The effect of moral foundations in prosocial crowdfunding. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 932–951.
KaniastyK. (2020). Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 105–109.
26.
MayrU., & FreundA. M. (2020). Do we become more prosocial as we age, and if so, why?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 248–254.
27.
McGuireA. P., HaydenC., FrankfurtS. B., KurzA. S., AndersonA. R., HowardB. A. N., & SzaboY. Z. (2020). Social engagement early in the US COVID-19 crisis: Exploring social support and prosocial behavior between those with and without depression or anxiety in an online sample. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 39(10), 923–953.
28.
NilssonA., ErlandssonA., & VästfjällD. (2020). Moral foundations theory and the psychology of charitable giving. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 431–447.
29.
NowakowskaI., DudaE., & SzulawskiM. (2024). Heading for the better future with my company: Work‐related prosocial intentions as a function of moral foundations and consideration of future consequences. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), e2825.
30.
NowakowskaI., & PozziM. (2024). Volunteering intentions during social crises: The role of considering the welfare of others and consequences of own behavior. Acta Psychologica, 246, 104289.
31.
SchwartzS. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. In MikulincerM. & ShaverP. R. (Eds), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). American Psychological Association.
32.
SmithK. B., AlfordJ. R., HibbingJ. R., MartinN. G., & HatemiP. K. (2017). Intuitive ethics and political orientations: Testing moral foundations as a theory of political ideology. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 424–437.
33.
SüssenbachP., ReesJ., & GollwitzerM. (2019). When the going gets tough, individualizers get going: On the relationship between moral foundations and prosociality. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 122–131.
34.
ThielmannI., SpadaroG., & BallietD. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90.
35.
van de GroepS., ZanolieK., GreenK. H., SweijenS. W., & CroneE. A. (2020). A daily diary study on adolescents’ mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 15(10), e0240349.
36.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22, 53–97.
37.
WangT. M., Van WitteloostuijnA., & HeineF. (2020). A moral theory of public service motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 517763.
38.
WeberC. R., & FedericoC. M. (2013). Moral foundations and heterogeneity in ideological preferences. Political Psychology, 34(1), 107–126.
39.
ZhongC. B., & LiljenquistK. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452.
40.
ZhuY., & AkhtarS. (2014). How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior: The role of trust and prosocial motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 373–392.
