The present study aims at assessing the quality of work life (QWL) of Nepalese mahouts and their relationship with elephants. The article is based on the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale measurement to determine the QWL of the 108 mahouts (handlers of captivated elephants) working at and around national parks in Nepal and interviews with another four mahouts who are known as the opinion leaders in their profession. The survey results reveal that mahouts are less concerned about their own QWL but more about their elephants’ daily workload and bonding with them. The job and career satisfaction are positively correlated with general well-being (GWB) and control at work respectively. The study indicates a positive correlation between work–home interface and GWB, indicating a positive bond between elephants and their mahouts, leading to improved well-being. From the interview of four mahouts, we found that the mahouts’ QWL was determined by job satisfaction, emotional intelligence, bonding and trust with elephants rather than conventional factors of QWL. Hence, the QWL is a complex interplay of the emotional rewards of working with animals and the physical and mental challenges that come with their roles.
AbdullahN. A. C., ZakariaN., & ZahoorN. (2021). Developments of quality of work-life research and direction for future research. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211059177
2.
Animal Welfare Network Nepal (AWNN) & PETA India. (2011). An assessment of the welfare aspect of elephant training at the elephant breeding center Khorsor, Sauraha, Chitwan, Nepal. Animal Welfare Network Nepal (AWNN) & PETA India.
3.
BansiddhiP., BrownJ. L., ThitaramC., PunyapornwithayaV., & NganvongpanitK. (2019). Elephant tourism in Thailand: A review of animal welfare practices and needs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522
4.
BurchellB., SehnbruchK., PiasnaA., & AgloniN. (2014) The quality of employment and decent work: Definitions, methodologies and ongoing debates. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(2), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet067
5.
CarlsteadK., ParisS., & BrownJ. L. (2019). Good keeper-elephant relationships in North American zoos are mutually beneficial to welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 211, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.11.003
6.
CrawleyJ. A. H., LiehrmannO., dos SantosD. J. F., BrownJ., NyeinU. K., AungH. H., HtutW., OoZ. M., SeltmannM. W., WebbJ. L., LahdenperäM., & LummaaV. (2021). Influence of handler relationships and experience on health parameters, glucocorticoid responses and behaviour of semi-captive Asian elephants. Conservation Physiology, 9(1), coaa116. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa116.
7.
ColemanG. J., HemsworthP. H., HayM., & CoxM. (2000). Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66(1–2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00073-8
8.
ElizurD., & ShyeS. (1990). Quality of work life and its relation to quality of life. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1990.tb01054.x
9.
Gómez-BaggethunE., CorberaE., & Reyes-GarcíaV. (2013). Traditional ecological knowledge and global environmental change: Research findings and policy implications. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 72. https://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06288-180472
10.
GoodeD. A. (1989). Quality of life, quality of work life. In KiernanW. E. & SchalockR. L. (Eds.), Economics, industry and disability: A look ahead (pp. 337–349). Paul H. Brookes.
11.
GroteG., & GuestD. (2017). The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. Human Relations, 70(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716654746
12.
GuestD. (2022). Quality of working life. In WarhurstC., MathieuC. & DwyerR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of job quality (pp. 23–40). Oxford University Press.
13.
GutiérrezR. J., WoodK. A., RedpathS. M., & YoungJ. C. (2016). Conservation conflicts: Future research challenges. In MateoR., ArroyoB., & GraciaJ. T. (Eds.), Current trends in wildlife research, wildlife research monographs (Vol. 1, pp. 267–282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27912-1_11
14.
HartL., & Sundar (2000). Family traditions for mahouts of Asian elephants. Anthrozoös, 13(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279300787000055
15.
HemsworthP. H. (2003). Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0
16.
HemsworthP., BarnettJ., & ColemanG. (2009). The integration of human-animal relations into animal welfare monitoring schemes. Animal Welfare, 18(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600000737
17.
HerrickN. Q. (1981). The means and end of work. Human Relations, 34(7), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678103400707
18.
Janch Bujh Kendra. (1985). Hathi Byawasthapan Yojana Tarjuma (in vernacular). Jaanch Bujh Kendra, Royal Palace.
19.
KnightC., & ParkerS. (2021). How work redesign interventions affect performance: An evidence-based model from a systematic review. Human Relations, 74(1), 69–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719865604
20.
LawlerE. E.III. (1975). Measuring the psychological quality of working life: The why and how of it. In DavisL. E. & ChernsA. B. (Eds.), The quality of working life (Vol. 1, pp. 123)–133). Free Press.
21.
LockeP. (2011). The ethnography of captive elephant management in Nepal: A synopsis. Gajah, 34(1), 32–40.
22.
LoscoccoK. A., & RoschelleA. N. (1991). Influences on the quality of work and nonwork life: Two decades in review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(2), 182–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90009-B
23.
Md-SidinS., SambasivanM., & IsmailI. (2010). Relationship between work-family conflict and quality of life an investigation into the role of social support. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011013876
24.
MejbelA. A., AlmsafirM. K., SironR., & AlnaserA. S. M. (2013). The drivers of Quality of Working Life (QWL): A critical review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(10), 398–405.
25.
MumbyH. S. (2019). Mahout perspectives on Asian elephants and their living conditions. Animals, 9(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9110879
26.
PoudelS., & SthapitA. (2021). Work-family balance and employee performance in Nepalese commercial banks. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 12(1), 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.18843/ijcms/v12i1/04
27.
PradhanN. M. B., WilliamsA. C., & DhakalM. (2011). Current status of Asian elephants in Nepal. Gajah, 35, 87–92.
28.
SharmaB. S., & SwamiS. (2019). A significance of quality of work life. Inspira-Journal of Commerce, Economics & Computer Science, 5(2), 82–86.
29.
SudiroA., AdiA. N., FithrianaN., FaisiehM. F. I., & SoeltonM. (2023). Towards emotional intelligence and quality of work life: Improving the role of work attitude. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2189992
Van de WaterA., & MattesonK. (2018). Human-elephant conflict in western Thailand: Socio-economic drivers and potential mitigation strategies. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0194736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194736
32.
Van LaarD., EdwardsJ. A., & EastonS. (2007). The work-related quality of life scale for healthcare workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04409.x
33.
VarmaS., & GangulyS. (2011). Captive elephants in Bardia National Park, Nepal: Investigations into population, management, welfare and a review of elephant training by Working Elephant Programme of Asia (WEPA), and WWF Finland at Bardia Hattisar, Elephants in Captivity [CUPA/ ANCF-Occasional Report. No.18]. Compassion Unlimited Plus Action (CUPA) and Asian Nature Conservation Foundation (ANCF).
34.
von der BeckB., WissmannA., TolbaR. H., DammannP., & HilkenG. (2024). What can laboratory animal facility managers do to improve the welfare of laboratory animals and laboratory animal facility staff? A German perspective. Animals, 14(7), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071136
35.
WaltonR. (1975). Criteria for quality of work life. In DavisL. E. and ChernsR. L. (Eds.), The quality of working life: Problems, prospects, and the state-of-the-art (Vol. 1, pp. 12)–54). Free Press.
36.
WarhurstC., & KnoxA. (2022). Manifesto for a new quality of working life. Human Relations, 75(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720979348
37.
YoungL., FerraraF., KellyL., MartinT., Thompson-IritaniS., & LaFolletteM. R. (2024). Professional quality of life in animal research personnel is linked to retention & job satisfaction: A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey on compassion fatigue in the USA. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0298744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298744
