The lacunae of Theory X and Theory Y compounded with insufficient research evidence in favour of these theories resulted in the proposition of Theory Z. It is a beautiful amalgamation of both Theory X and Y and has enough empirical evidence to support it. It is easily deduced that most of the successful firms share some common characteristics, which are untouched by geographical boundaries of nations. Theory Z has great relevance in the Indian scenario, as it is a culmination of both American and Japanese cultures. India interestingly has a national culture, which is also a blend of both types of characteristics. This study draws from ethics related literature from ancient Indian scriptures to demonstrate the points of convergence and divergence between Theory Z and the Indian management approach. It also tries to emphasize the applicability of the old phenomenon in the light of new changes in the corporate world.
Allison, A.B. and C.D. Hayes (2000), ‘ Cross-national Differences in the Cognitive Style: Implication for Management ’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (1), 161–70 .
2.
Aycan, Zeynep , Rabindra Kanungo , Manuel Mendonca , Kaicheng Yu , Jürgen Deller , Günter Stahl and Anwar Kurshid (2000), ‘ Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A Ten Country Comparison ’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1), 192–221 .
Bank, J. (1992), The Essence of Total Quality Management ( New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. ).
5.
Banks, Robert L. and Steven C.Wheelwright (1979), ‘ Operation Vs. Strategy: Trading Tomorrow for Today ’, Harvard Business Review, 57 (3), 112–20 .
6.
Bass, B.M. (1967), ‘ Some Effect on a Group of Whether and When the Head Reveals His Opinion ’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 2 (4), 375–82 .
7.
Buhler, G. , ed. & trans. (1886), The Laws of Manu (Manusmriti) ( Oxford Clarendon Press ).
8.
Cascio, W.O. (1974), ‘ Functional Specialization, Culture and Preference for Participative Management ’, Personnel Psychology, 27 (4), 593–603 .
9.
Chakraborty, S.K. (1985). Human Response in Organizations ( Calcutta: Vivekananda Nidhi ).
10.
Chatterjee, Debashis . (1995). ‘ Workship and the Spirit of Action ’, Journal of Human Values, 1, 117–26 .
11.
Chhokar, Jagdeep Singh , C. Brodbeck. Felix and J. House Robert (2007), Culture and Leadership Across the World: The GLOBE Book of InDepth Studies of 25 Societies, 1st ed. ( Psychology Press ).
12.
Chaudhari, Arindam (2001), Count Your Chickens before They Hatch. ( New Delhi: Sangam Books Ltd. ).
Gupta, J.L. (1985), Leadership Styles and Power Sharing in Business Enterprises ( Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House ).
20.
Hayes, Robert H. and William J. Abernathy (1980), ‘ Managing Our Way to Economic Decline ’, Harvard Business Review, 58 (4), 67–77 .
21.
Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values ( Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications ).
22.
Hofstede, G. and K. Peterson (2000), ‘National Values and Organizational Practices’, in Neal Ashkanasy , Celeste P. M. Wilderom and Mark F. Peterson , eds, Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate ( Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE International ).
23.
Hoyt, Timothy D. (2000), ‘ Modernizing the Indian Armed Forces ’, Joint Force Quaterly, 25, 17–22 .
24.
Jayakar, Roshni (1996), ‘ How Do You Use the New Leadership to Run Your Company? ’, Business Today, 22 March to 6 April, pp. 80–89 .
25.
Jayakar, Roshni and Rukmini Parthasarathy (1996), ‘ How to Train for Leadership ’, Business Today, Fourth Anniversary Issue, New Delhi , 7–21 January, pp. 198–203 .
Kakar, S. (1971), ‘ Authority Patterns and Subordinate Behaviour in Indian Organizations ’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 (3), 298–307 .
28.
Kakar, S. (1974), Personality and Authority in Work ( Bombay and New Delhi: Somaiya Publications ).
29.
Kalra, S.K. (1974), ‘A Study of High Achievers in an Industrial Organization: A Study in a Nationalized Bank’, PhD thesis, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Bombay .
30.
Kalra, S.K. (1975), ‘ Are We Ripe for Participative Management? ’, ISTD Review, 5 (3), 12–13 .
31.
Kalra, S.K. (1981), ‘ Differences in Recall of Adolescent Socialization Among High and Low Achievers ’, Business Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11 (6), 562–68 .
32.
Kalra, S.K. (1988), ‘ Reaction to Authoritarian Leadership: A Projective Study ’, Indian Journal of Social Work, 39 (1), 27–43 .
33.
Kumar, Usha and K.K. Singh (1976), ‘ The Interpersonal Construct System of the India Manager: A Determinant of Organisational Behavior ’, Indian Journal of Psychology, 51 (4), 275–90 .
34.
Meade, R.D. (1967), ‘ An Experimental Study of Leadership in India ’, Journal of Social Psychology, 72 (1), 35–43 .
35.
Mishra, R. (1980), ‘A Study of Role Clarity Efficiency and Job Satisfaction’, PhD thesis, Patna University, Patna .
36.
Nehru, Jawaharlal (1985), The Discovery of India. Centenary Edition ( Delhi: Oxford University Press ).
Ouchi, William G. (1979), ‘A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms’, Management Science, 25 (9), 833–48 .
39.
Ouchi, William S. (1981), Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge ( MA: Addison-Wesley ).
40.
Ouchi, William G. and Alfred M. Jaeger (1978), ‘ Type Z Organization: Stability in the Midst of Mobility ’, Academy of Management Review, 3 (2), 305–14 .
Tayab, M.H. (1988), Organisations and National Culture: A Comparative Analysis ( London: SAGE Publications ).
52.
Thiagrajan, K.M. and S.D. Deep (1970), ‘ A Study of Supervisor Subordinate Influence on Satisfaction in Four Cultures ’, Journal of Social Psychology, 82 (2), 173–80 .
53.
Verma, R. (1997), Sanskrit Subhashit Suman ( New Delhi: Meghraj Publishers ).
54.
Virmani, B.R. and S. Guptan (1991), Indian Management ( New Delhi: Vision Books ).
55.
Wheelwright, S.C. (1981), ‘ Japan—Where Operations Really Are Strategic ’, Harvard Business Review, 59 (4), 67–74 .
