The primary objective of this study is to assess the practicality and consequences of establishing railway connectivity between India and Myanmar. By exploring the possible impact of this initiative on the relationship between the two countries and regional collaboration, this study aims to shed light on its potential benefits and challenges. The railway network aims to enhance connectivity between the Northeastern states of India and Myanmar, providing a new trade route with Southeast Asia. The study was based on policy review, meta-data analysis, bibliometric literature review and case studies using geospatial techniques. The results indicate that the proposed railway connectivity has the potential to boost trade, tourism and investment and strengthen regional cooperation. However, significant challenges such as security concerns, financial viability and political stability need to be addressed to realise the potential of railway connectivity fully. The study concludes that strong political will, effective project management and public–private partnerships are crucial for the success of the India–Myanmar railway connectivity and its potential impact on bilateral relations and regional cooperation.
AdelmanI. (2000). The role of government in economic development. In TarpF. (Ed.), Foreign aid and development (p. 23). Routledge.
2.
Aguirre-BastosC. (2023). Internationalization of science and diplomacy, concepts and practices: Lessons for developing countries. In IttekkotV. & BawejaJ. K. (Eds), Science, technology and innovation diplomacy in developing countries. Research for development (pp. 9–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6802-0_2
3.
AllenK., BuklijasT., ChenA., Simon-KumarN., CowenL., WilsdonJ., & GluckmanP. (2020). Tracking global evidence-to-policy pathways in the coronavirus crisis: A preliminary report. The International Network for Government Science Advice.
4.
AzadiM., NortheyS. A., AliS. H., & EdrakiM. (2020). Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience, 13(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3
5.
BalaB., & TarU. A. (2021). Regional cooperation in West Africa: Counter-terrorism and counter-insurgency. African Security, 14(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2021.1929747
6.
BanaN., & YhomeK. (2017). The road to Mekong: The India–Myanmar–Thailand trilateral highway project. Observer Research Foundation.
7.
BanerjeeS. (2023). India’s connectivity projects with Myanmar, postcoup: A stocktaking. Observer Research Foundation.
8.
BhandariA., & JindalC. (2017). Bangladesh: Controlling financial infrastructure. Indian Council on Global Relations. https://www.gatewayhouse.in/chinese-investments-in-bangladesh/
9.
BhatiaR. K. (2011). Myanmar–India relations: The way forward. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 6(3), 315–326.
10.
BhattacharyaJ., & TieriS. (2018). India’s new geopolitical paradigm and reintegration of the Bay of Bengal. Institute of South Asian Studies.
11.
BoyleE., WatsonC., McGookinC., DeaneA., de BhailísD. D., McElligottC., O’HaraS., TuohyB., GallachóirB. Ó., & MullallyG. (2021). Reflecting on a collaborative approach to a regional sustainability transition: Dingle Peninsula 2030. Reflective Practice, 22(3), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1911794
12.
ChaberekG. (2021). The possibility of reducing individual motorised traffic through the location of collection points using the example of Gdansk, Poland. Sustainability, 13(19), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910661
13.
ChakravartyP. R. (2014). India’s foreign policy in the neighbourhood. Indian Foreign Affairs Journal, 9(2), 142–157.
14.
ChapmanG. P. (2003). The geopolitics of South Asia: From early empires to the nuclear age. Ashgate Publishing.
15.
CooleyA. (2012). The new great power contest in Central Asia. In CooleyA. (Ed.), Great games, local rules: The new great power contest in Central Asia (pp. 3–15). Oxford University Press.
16.
DasP. (2022). Security challenges along the India–Myanmar border. London School of Economics.
17.
DashD. K. (2022). Railway Board sanctions final location survey of Imphal–Moreh line within hours after Vaishnaw’s assurance. Times of India.
18.
DaurenA. (2021). Regional security in Central Asia: Addressing existing and potential threats and challenges. Eurasian Research Journal, 1(1), 51–65.
19.
DeP. (2010). ASEAN-India connectivity: An Indian perspective. In KimuraF. & UmezakiS. (Eds), ASEAN-India connectivity: The comprehensive Asia development plan (pp. 95–150). ERIA.
20.
DekaP. (2007). The Great Indian corridor in the east. Mittal Publication.
21.
DelinicT., & PandeyN. N. (2012). SAARC: Towards meaningful cooperation. Centre for South Asian Studies.
22.
DharS. (2021). Geopolitical scenario of Tripura: An analytical study on state, people and developmental policies. Tripura University.
23.
DharS., RoyS., & MitraS. (2021). ‘Muhuri Char’—An unresolved dot on Indo-Bangla Land Boundary at Tripura: A study of border security vulnerabilities. Hill Geographers, 37(1), 1–15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357205700_Muhuri_Char’-an_unresolved_dot_on_Indo-Bangla_Land_Boundary_at_Tripura_A_study_of_Border_Security_Vulnerabilities
24.
ERIA. (2020). The India–Myanmar–Thailand trilateral highway and its possible eastward extension to Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Viet Nam: Challenges and opportunities. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
25.
FatimaQ., & JamshedA. (2015). The political and economic significance of Indian Ocean: An analysis. South Asian Studies, 30(2), 73–89.
26.
GangulyS. (2002). India’s alliances 2020. In ChambersM. R. (Ed.), South Asia in 2020: Future strategic balances and alliances (pp. 363–364). ETH Zürich.
27.
GokhaleV. (2022). A historical evaluation of China’s India policy: Lessons for India–China relations. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
28.
HaddawayN. R., PageM. J., PritchardC. C., & McGuinnessL. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and open synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230.
29.
InkpenA. C., & BeamishP. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180263
30.
JetlyR. (2010). India and China: Emerging dynamics and regional security perspectives. Institute of South Asian Studies.
31.
JhaS. (2022). India approves location survey for Myanmar line. International Railway Journal. https://www.railjournal.com/infrastructure/india-approves-location-survey-for-myanmar-line/
32.
JiY. (2007). Dealing with the Malacca Dilemma: China’s effort to protect its energy supply. Strategic Analysis, 31(3), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160701415743
33.
KarimM. A., & IslamF. (2018). Bangladesh–China–India–Myanmar (BCIM) economic corridor: Challenges and prospects. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 30(2), 283–302.
34.
KobayashiY., & KingJ. (2022). Myanmar’s strategy in the China–Myanmar Economic Corridor: A failure in hedging?International Affairs, 98(3), 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac049
35.
KumuraF., & UmezakiS. (2011). ASEAN-India connectivity: The comprehensive Asia development plan, Phase II. ERIA.
36.
MalikJ. M. (1994). Sino-Indian rivalry in Myanmar: Implications for regional security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 16(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS16-2B
37.
MalikH. Y. (2015). Siliguri: A geopolitical manoeuvre corridor in the eastern Himalayan region for China and India. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 1(3), 699–703.
38.
MiddletonT. (2023). Connective insecurities: Chokepoint pragmatics at India’s chicken neck. Journal of Anthropology, 88(2), 204–225.
39.
Ministry of External Affairs. (2012). India–Myanmar relations. Government of India.
40.
Ministry of Railways. (2016). Indo-Myanmar rail network. Government of India.
41.
MitraS., RoyS., & DharS. (2021). A geopolitical and regional sustainability of Sabroom town, Tripura: A road map for future. In BanerjeeT. (Ed.), Geoinformatics in research and development (pp. 128–151). South Asian Institute for Advanced Research & Development. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355982678_A_Geopolitical_and_Regional_Sustainability_of_Sabroom_Town_Tripura_A_Road_Map_for_Future
42.
ModiN. (15August2021). Highlights from PM Modi’s Independence Day speech. https://www.narendramodi.in/2021-the-prime-minister-shri-narendra-modi-addressed-the-nation-from-the-ramparts-of-the-red-fort-on-the-75th-independence-day-556739
43.
NgA., & LoosemoreM. (2007). Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.005
44.
Nikkei Asia. (2022). China carves path to Indian Ocean with Myanmar rail network. Nikkei.
45.
Northeast Frontier Railway. (2022). Jiribam–Imphal new line railway project work in Manipur progressing steadily: 91.78% progress achieved. Government of India.
46.
OmojuO., & AdesanyaO. (2012). Does trade promote growth in developing countries? Empirical evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1(3), 743–753.
47.
OoZ., JoeleneC., MinolettiP., PhyuP. P., SawK. P., WinN. W., PorterI., OyeM., & SmurraA. (2015). Fiscal management in Myanmar. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series.
48.
PalitA. (2016). India’s act east policy and implications for Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 81–92. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789814695671-009/html?lang=en
49.
PandaJ. P. (2017). India–China relations: Politics of resources, identity and authority in a multipolar world order. Routledge.
50.
PasseriA. (2021). The domestic and international implications of Myanmar’s 2021 military coup. IKMAS.
51.
PatgiriR., & HazarikaO. B. (2023). Look (Act) East Policy and Northeast India: Reimagining the space through institutional, physical and social connectivity. International Studies, 60(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817231167994
52.
Raja MohanC., MaloneD., & RaghavanS. (2015). The Oxford handbook of Indian foreign policy. Oxford University Press.
53.
RanaK. S. (2007). Bilateral diplomacy. DiploFoundation.
54.
Ray ChaudhuryA. B., & BasuP. (2015). India–Myanmar connectivity: Possibilities and challenges. Observer Research Foundation.
55.
RodrigueJ. P., & SlackB. (2017). The geography of transport systems. Routledge.
56.
RosnaniR., HeryadiD., YaniY. M., & SinagaO. (2022). ASEAN maritime security cooperation. Journal of Maritime Research, 19(2), 60–64.
57.
RoyS., & MitraS. (2016). Infrastructural status of railway transport system in Northeast India: A geographical analysis. Asian Journal of Spatial Science, 4, 89–100.
58.
RoyS., & MitraS. (2022b). Does physio-environmental determinism influence the infrastructural development of railway stations?Journal of Infrastructure Development, 14(2), 91–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749306221140720
59.
RoyS., & MitraS. (2022a). Negative externalities of railway station on environmental sustainability: Evidence from Tripura, India. Acadlore Transactions on Geosciences, 1(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.56578/atg010107
60.
RoyS., HoreS., MitraS., & ChaberekG. (2022). Delineating regional differentiation on the development of the railway infrastructure in Northeast India through an efficient synthetic indicator. Transport Problems, 17(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2022.17.3.13
61.
RoyS., DebnathP., & MitraS. (2023). Impact of climate disasters on railway infrastructure: Case study of Northeast India. Acadlore Transactions on Geosciences, 2(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.56578/atg020104
62.
RundeD. F., & RamanujanR. (2022). Beyond 2025 the future of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (pp. 1–12). Center for Strategic and International Studies.
63.
SahuA. (2023). Analyzing India’s policy options for Myanmar. South Asian Voices, 1–4. https://southasianvoices.org/analyzing-indias-policy-options-for-myanmar/
64.
SangpuiL. (2020). Indo-Myanmar border trade and development of border villages in Mizoram. Mizoram University.
65.
SauvagerdM. (2018). India’s strategies on its periphery: A case study in the India–Bhutan relationship. ASIEN, 146, 56–77.
66.
SinghY. (2007). India–Vietnam relationships: The road ahead. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
67.
SinhaR. (2023). Roll east: A proposal for India–Myanmar–Thailand railway connectivity. Centre for Social and Economic Progress.
68.
ShrivastvaC., RoyS., & AshokD. (2023). Border region railway development in Sino-Indian geopolitical competition. India Quarterly, 79(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284231165111
69.
TanejaN., NaingT. H., JoshiS., SinghT. B., BimalS., GargS., RoyR., & SharmaM. (2019). India’s act east policy: Facilitating India–Myanmar border trade. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
70.
TaylorR. H. (2005). Do states make nations? The politics of identity in Myanmar revisited. South East Asia Research, 13(3), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000005775179676
71.
ThankurR., & WiggenO. (2004). South Asia in the world: Problem solving perspectives on security, sustainable development and good governance. United Nations University Press.
72.
TheintM. M. (2022). Myanmar’s perspective on Thailand–Myanmar southern economic corridor in the context of ASEAN. In ChitathivatS., TingsabadhC. & DeP. (Eds), The two oceans of Indo-Pacific: Strengthening the Myanmar–Thailand southern corridor. SAGE.
73.
WeiT., WuJ., & ChenS. (2021). Keeping track of greenhouse gas emission reduction progress and targets in 167 cities worldwide. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.696381
74.
WengL., XueL., SayerJ., RiggsR. A., LangstonJ. D., & BoedhihartonoA. K. (2021). Challenges faced by Chinese firms implementing the “Belt and Road Initiative”: Evidence from three railway projects. Research in Globalization, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100074
75.
WoodD. J., & GrayB. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 209–227.
76.
YhomeK. (2015). The Burma Roads: India’s search for connectivity through Myanmar. Asian Survey, 55(6), 1217–1240. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.6.1217
77.
YoroK. O., & DaramolaM. O. (2020). CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. Advances in Carbon Capture, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819657-1.00001-3
78.
ZhouT. (2019). Aligning the Belt and road initiative with Myanmar’s sustainable development plan: Opportunities and challenges. IDS Bulletin, 55(4), 69–88.
