What if a museum is not built out of cement and stone, but codes on a virtual space? In what ways do virtual platforms operationalise the concept of a museum? The paper explores these questions based on the empirical case study of Museum of Material Memory (MMM) and how it operates on Instagram. To this end, the objectives of this paper are twin fold. Firstly, it investigates the characteristics that make MMM a museum as distinct from a social media blog or a website. And secondly, it explores the politics of curation in relation to conventional physical museums in conjunction with issues thrown up by Instagram as a medium of display. The paper argues that MMM’s virtual mode of operation challenges the methods of heritage conservation envisaged by museums by demonstrating how tangible heritage can be museumised through virtual means. In doing so, MMM lays emphasis not only on the object per se, but also on the relationship that the object may have with its setting and the people around it. Such a model of display democratises expertise by obfuscating the difference between producers and consumers of heritage.
BlackG. (2011). Museums, memory and history. Cultural and Social History, 8(3), 415–427.
2.
BouquetM. (2012). Museums: A visual anthropology. Berg.
3.
Brown History. (2020). Brown history. https://www.instagram.com/brownhistory/?hl=en
4.
Brown History. (2022). Brown history. https://instagram.com/brownhistory?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
5.
CameronF. R. (2020). Theorising heritage collection digitisations in global computational infrastructures. In LewiH., SmithW., LehnD. V., & CookeS.(Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of new digital practices in galleries, libraries, archives, museums and heritage sites (pp. 55–67). Routledge.
6.
DudleyS. H. (2010). Museum materialities: Objects, sense and feeling. InDudleyS. H.(Ed.), Museum materialities: Objects, engagements, interpretations (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
7.
DuncanC. (1991). Art museums and the ritual of citizenship. InKarpI. & LavineS. D.(Eds.), Exhibiting cultures: The poetics and politics of museum display (pp. 88–103). Smithsonian Institute.
8.
DuncanC. (1995). Civilizing rituals: Inside public art museums. Routledge.
9.
GrahamM., & KhosraviS. (2002). Reordering public and private in Iranian cyberspace: Identity, politics, and mobilization. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 9(2), 219–246.
10.
HarrisonJ. D. (2005). Ideas of museums in the 1990s. InCorsaneG.(Ed.), Heritage, museums and galleries: An introductory reader (pp. 41–57). Routledge.
11.
Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) & Nielson. (2019). India Internet 2019. Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI).
12.
JordanovaL. (1989). Objects of knowledge: A historical perspective on museums. InVergoP.(Ed.), The new museology (pp. 22–40). Reaktion Books.
13.
LentzR. G. (2011). Civil society in the digital age. InEdwardsM.(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of civil society (pp. 337–348). Oxford University Press.
14.
MalhotraA. (2020). With face to face interviews ruled out during the pandemic, how are oral historians coping?Scroll.in. 13September. https://scroll.in/article/972903/with-face-to-face-interviews-ruled-out-during-the-pandemic-how-are-oral-historians-coping
15.
MolyneauxB. L. (1994). Introduction: the represented past. InMolyneauxB. L. & StoneP. G.(Eds.), The presented past: Heritage, museums and education (pp. 1–13), Routledge.
16.
Museum of Material Memory (MMM). (2017a). The museum. http://museumofmaterialmemory.com/the-museum/
17.
Museum of Material Memory (MMM). (2017b). Submission form. http://www.museumofmaterialmemory.com/submission-form/
18.
Museum of Material Memory (MMM). (2017c). Terms and conditions. http://www.museumofmaterialmemory.com/terms-and-conditions/
19.
Museum of Material Memory (MMM). (2019). Museum of material memory (Instagram). https://www.instagram.com/museumofmaterialmemory/
20.
NaikP. (2014). Regal memory: Remembering Indian princes. South Asian Survey, 21(1&2), 243–259.
21.
OwensT. (2018). The theory and craft of digital preservation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
RodleyE. (2020). The distributed museum is already here: It’s just not very evenly distributed. InLewiH., SmithW., vom LehnD., & CookeS.(Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of new digital practices in galleries, libraries, archives, museums and heritage sites (pp. 81–91). Routledge.
23.
RowlandsM. (1994). The politics of identity in archaeology. InBondG. C. & GilliamA.(Eds.), Social constructions of the past: Representation as power (pp. 129–143). Routledge.
24.
SmithC. S. (1989). Museums, artifacts, and meanings. InVergoP.(Ed.), The new museology (pp. 1–21). Reaktion Books.
25.
SvenssonT. (2020). Curating the partition: Dissonant heritage and Indian nation building. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 26(8), 1–17.
26.
SylvesterC. (2009). Art/Museums: International relations where we least expect it. Paradigm Publishers.
27.
TaylorJ., & GibsonL. K. (2017). Digitisation, digital interaction and social media: Embedded barriers to democratic heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 23(5), 408–420.
28.
TripathiS. (2019). Hashtag, history: There’s a growing appetite for online archives from South Asia. https://www.thehindu.com/society/history-and-culture/hashtag-history-theres-a-growing-appetite-for-online-archives-from-south-asia/article30122481.ece
29.
VivekanandanJ. (2014). ‘Civilisation drove forward in a mortuary Cart’: Reading colonial constructions of violence. South Asian Survey, 21(1&2), 227–242.
30.
VivekanandanJ. (2021). ‘The eyed side of the glass’: Transnational curation and the politics of exhibiting the empire in a post-imperial world. Postcolonial Studies, 24(2), 195–211.
31.
WalmsleyD. (2000). Community, place and cyberspace. Australian Geographer, 31(1), 5–19.
