The present study examines the regional disparities in social development in India by using social development index (SDI). The study used census-based data of 2011 including 28 states and seven union territories (UTs) of India. The study ends by ranking of states and UTs on the basis of development index consisting of 12 social indicators. This article also compares selected states on the basis of human development index (1981, 1991 and 2001) and SDI (2011) values. In addition, the study finds district-level SDI and ranks the districts of selected states, that is, Kerala, Haryana and Bihar. The findings of the study confirmed the northern–southern social development divide in India. The empirical findings show that Kerala is the best state among all states in India in terms of social progress. Results of the study confirmed huge disparities at district and states/UTs level in India.
AhmadS. N.ShamimM. (1998). Spatial dimensions of social and economic inequalities in Bihar. The Geographer, 45(2), 70–77.
2.
AhmedS.VarshneyA. (2008). Battles half won: The political economy of India’s growth and economic policy since independence (Working Paper No. 15). Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development.
3.
BakshiS.ChawlaA.ShahM. (2015). Regional disparities in India: A moving frontier. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(1), 44–52.
4.
BasuS. R. (2004). Economic growth, well-being and governance under economic reforms: Evidence from Indian states (HEI Working Paper No. 05/2004). Geneva: The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
5.
BasuS. (2015). India’s future shaped by the past: The politics of foreign investment. Global Asia, 10(2), 80–86.
6.
BhagwatiJ. (2014). A comparison of developmental outcomes in Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(15), 55–63.
7.
BhattacharyaB. (1998). Urbanisation and human development in West Bengal: A district level study and comparison with inter-state variation. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(47–48), 3027–3032.
8.
BhattacharyaG. (2009). Intra-state disparity in government expenditure: An analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26–27), 231–237.
9.
BhattacharyaB. B.SakthivelS. (2004). Regional growth and disparity in India: Comparison of pre-and post-reform decades. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(10), 1071–1077.
10.
BirthalP. S.SinghH.KumarS. (2011). Agriculture, economic growth and regional disparities in India. Journal of International Development, 23(1), 119–131.
11.
BourguignonF.MorrissonC. (2002). Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992. American Economic Review, 92(4), 727–744.
12.
ChakrabortyA. (2009). Some normatively relevant aspects of inter-state and intra-state disparities. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26–27), 179–184.
13.
ChandM.PuriV. K. (Eds.) (1983). Regional imbalances and inequalities in India. In Regional planning in India (pp. 165–218). New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited.
14.
ChoudharyA. P. (2008). Regional disparities in educational development in India-patterns and policy issues. The Indian Economic Association Conference, 27–29 December, M.S. University, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
15.
DadibhaviR. V. (1987). Why these inter-state disparities?Yojana, 31(11).
16.
DasS. K.BaruaA. (1996). Regional inequalities, economic growth and liberalisation: A study of the Indian economy. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(3), 364–390.
17.
DashB. B. (2014). Regional income disparity and government intervention in India: Evidence from sub-national data. South Asia Economic Journal, 15(2), 281–314.
18.
DattaA.RodgersG.RodgersJ.SinghB. K. N. (2014). Contrasts in development in Bihar: A tale of two villages. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(9), 1197–1208.
19.
DebapriyaA.MohantyM. K. (2008). Inter-district disparity in levels of development in education and health care facilities—A case of Orissa. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 40(1), 118–123.
20.
Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). (2013). Report on the world social situation: Inequality matters. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, DESA, United Nations.
21.
DevS. M.RaviC. (2007). Poverty and inequality: All-India and states, 1983–2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(6), 509–521.
22.
DholakiaR. H. (1985). Regional disparity in economic growth in India. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.
23.
DholakiaR. H. (1994). Spatial dimension of acceleration of economic growth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(35), 2303–2309.
24.
DrèzeJ.SenA. (Eds.). (1997). Indian development: Selected regional perspectives. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
25.
DrezeJ.SenA. (1999). India: Economic development and social opportunity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
26.
DubeyA. (2009). Intra-state disparities in Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Orissa and Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26–27), 224–230.
FlorekK.ŁukaszewiczJ.PerkalJ.SteinhausH. I.ZubrzyckiS. (1952). Taksonomia. Wrocławska, Przegla˛d Antropologiczny, Poznan’, XVII.
29.
GhoshM. (2006). Economic growth and human development in Indian states. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(30), 3321–3327+3329.
30.
GostowskiZ. (1970). The use of taxonomic measures in target setting based on international comparisons. Quality and Quantity, 4(2), 355–363.
31.
GoswamiA.ChakrabortyP. (2007). Inequality in Indian economy. In GuptaK. R. (Ed.), Studies in Indian economy. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers.
32.
Government of India. (2001). National human Development report. New Delhi: Planning commission, Government of India.
33.
Government of India. (2011). 2011 Census of India. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs. Retrieved from www.censusindia.gov.in
34.
GuptaC. D. (2010). Unravelling Bihar’s growth miracle. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(52), 50–62.
35.
HillH. (2000, June6–8). Intra-country regional disparities. Paper presented at Second Asia Development Forum, Singapore.
36.
HirschmanA. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development in developing countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
IyengarN. S.SudarshanP. (1982). A method of classifying regions from multivariate data. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(51), 2047–2052.
38.
KhareM. (2011). Convergence, dispersal and devolution: Need for region-specific approach. In BagchiK. K. (Ed.), Regional disparities in India’s socio-economic development. New Delhi: New Century Publications.
39.
KohliA. (1989). Politics of economic liberalization in India. World Development, 17(3), 305–328.
40.
KohliA. (2006a). Politics of economic growth in India, 1980–2005: Part II. The 1990s and beyond. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(14), 1361–1370.
41.
KohliA. (2006b). Politics of economic growth in India, 1980–2005: Part I. The 1980s. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(13), 1251–1259.
42.
KohliA. (2007). State and redistributive development in India. Paper prepared for project on ‘Poverty Reduction and Policy Regimes’ sponsored by UN Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
43.
KoropeckyjI. S. (1972). Equalization of regional development in socialist countries: An empirical study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 21(1), 68–86.
44.
KrishnaK. L. (2004). Patterns and determinants of economic growth in Indian states (Working Paper No.144). ICRIER. Retrieved from http://icrier.org/pdf/wp144.pdf
45.
KrishnajiN. (1993). Widening distances: SDP variations 1961–81. In RajK. N. (Ed.), Development and change. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
46.
KumarN. (2017). Measurement of social development: Evidence from India. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1211–1230.
47.
KumarR.PalitA.SinghK. (2007). Sustainability of economic growth in India (Working Paper No.25). Waterloo, ON: Center for International Governance Innovation.
48.
KumarN.RaniR.KumarN. (2016). Causality between education expenditure and economic growth: Empirical evidence from India. Asian Profile, 44(6), 535–547.
49.
KumariR. (2014a). Development and disparity in Bihar. Journal of Regional Development and Planning, 3(2), 51–66.
KumariR. (2016). Regional disparity in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: A disaggregated level analysis. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 18(1–2), 121–146.
52.
KunduA.MohananP. C.VargheseK. (2013). Spatial and social inequalities in human development: India in the global context. New Delhi, India: United Nations Development Programme.
53.
KunduA.VargheseK. (2010). Regional inequality and ‘inclusive growth’ in India under globalization: Identification of lagging states for strategic intervention (Oxfam India Working Papers Series in Collaboration with Institute for Human Development). New Delhi: Institute for Human Development.
54.
KurianN. J. (2000). Widening regional disparities in India: Some indicators. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(7), 538–550.
55.
KurianN. J. (2007). Widening economic and social disparities: Implications for India. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 126(4), 374–380.
56.
KuznetsS. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
57.
LandK. C. (1975). Theories, models and indicators of social change. International Social Science Journal, 27(1), 7–37.
58.
LolayekarA.MukhopadhyayP. (2017). Growth convergence and regional inequality in India (1981–2012). Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15(2), 307–328.
59.
MaitiD.MarjitS. (2015). Regional openness, income growth and disparity during 1980–2009: Empirical evidences from major Indian states. South Asia Economic Journal, 16(1), 145–166.
60.
MohantyS. K.GovilD.ChauhanR. K.KimR.SubramanianS. V. (2016). Estimates of poverty and inequality in the districts of India, 2011–2012. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 1(2), 142–202.
61.
MyrdalG.SitohangP. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London, UK: Duckworth.
62.
NagarajR. A.VaroudakisA.VeganzonesM. (1998). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states (Working Paper No.131). OECD Development Centre, OECD Publishing.
63.
NagarajR. A.VaroudakisA.VeganzonesM. (2000). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian States. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 12(1), 45–70.
64.
NagarajR.ShrutiP.PandeyS. (2013). Have Gujarat and Bihar outperformed the rest of India? A statistical note. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(39), 39–41.
65.
NairK. R. G. (1982). Regional experience in a developing economy. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.
66.
NairK. R. G. (1993). New economic policy and development of backward regions: A note on Orissa. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(19), 939–941.
67.
NarainP.RaiS. C.SharmaS. D.BhatiaV. K. (2007). Statistical evaluation of social development at district level. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 61(2), 216–226.
68.
OhlanR. (2013). Pattern of regional disparities in socio-economic development in India: District level analysis. Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 841–873.
69.
PalP.GhoshJ. (2007). Inequality in India: A survey of recent trends (Working Papers No. 30). New York: United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
70.
PaulS.SridharK. S. (2015). The paradox of India’s north-south divide: Lessons from the states and regions. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
71.
PhullK. S. (2011). Inter-state disparities in India under liberalized regime. In BagchiK. K. (Ed.), Regional disparities in India’s socio-economic development. New Delhi: New Century Publications.
72.
PradhanR. P. (2007). India’s human development and social sector expenditure in the globalization regime. Man and Development, 29(1), 17–38.
73.
RaoM. G. (2009, October6). Regional development for inclusive growth. Business Standard, New Delhi.
74.
RayA. K. (2008). India’s social development in a decade of reforms: 1990–91/1999–2000. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 409–425.
75.
ReddyA. A.BantilanM. C. S. (2013). Regional disparities in Andhra Pradesh, India. Local Economy, 28(1), 123–135.
76.
SahooS. (2014). Globalization and politics of the poor in India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(1), 3–15.
77.
SarkarS.MehtaB. S. (2010). Income inequality in India: Pre-and post-reform periods. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(37), 45–55.
78.
SenA. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 44(2), 219–231.
79.
ShabanA.BholeL. M. (1999). Development and disparities in Maharashtra: A spatio-temporal analysis. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 31(1), 56–73.
80.
ShuklaR.RaiA.MongaN. (2010). India protection index: An objective measurement of the economic and social well-being of the Indian population. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 4(3), 339–367.
81.
Social Progress Imperative. (2015). Social progress index report. Washington, DC: Social Progress Imperative.
82.
Social Progress Imperative. (2018). Social progress index report. Washington, DC: Social Progress Imperative.
83.
SridharK. S.ReddyA. V. (2011). Investment and economic opportunities: Urbanization, infrastructure and governance in The North and South of India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 18(1), 1–46.
84.
The World Bank. (1997). India achievements and challenges in reducing poverty: A World Bank country study. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
85.
The World Bank. (2006a). Inclusive growth and service delivery: Building on India’s success: Draft development policy report, South Asia Region. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
86.
The World Bank. (2006b). India’s employment challenge: Creating jobs, helping workers. South Asia region draft report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
87.
TripathiS. (2013). Is urban economic growth inclusive in India?Margin—The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 7(4), 507–539.
88.
WilliamsonJ. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of the patterns. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13(4, Part 2), 1–84.
89.
World Bank. (1991). World Development Report 1991 : The Challenge of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
90.
World Bank. (1992). World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
91.
World Bank. (1993). World development report 1993: investing in health. World development report, World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
