The history of India’s interaction with the normative structures of the non-proliferation regime has been unique albeit tumultuous. The vibrancy of the roles and identities that India had attained in the normative churning of the regime is a useful case study to understand the dynamics of norm construction within the non-proliferation system. While the model of norm entrepreneurship can be used to explain this phenomenon, the Indian example shows that the spectrum of the term ‘agency’ can transcend the existing understanding of norm entrepreneurship. The article uses India’s non-proliferation history to examine how actors, based on their conceptions of interest and driven by various systemic factors, influence the norm construction process through different role identities.
AshleyRichard. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neo-realism’. International Organisation38 (2): Spring, 225–86.
3.
BarnesNatasha.2010. ‘Middle Powers as Norm Entrepreneurs: Comparative Diplomatic Strategies for the Promotion of the Norm of Nuclear Disarmament’, Master of Arts Dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, accessed fromhttp://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/6147/1/thesis_fulltext.pdf (accessed on 17August2014).
4.
ChafetzGlenn. 1995. ‘The Political Psychology of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime’. The Journal of Politics57 (3): 743–75.
5.
ChandlerDavid. 2012. ‘Promoting Democratic Norms? Social Constructivism and the “Subjective” Limits to Liberalism’. Democratization20 (2): 1–25.
6.
ENDC. 1964. Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament, ENDC/P.V.174.
7.
ENDC. 1965. Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament, ENDC/P.V. 223.
8.
ENDC. 1965. Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament, ENDC/P.V.370.
9.
ENDC. 1968. Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament, ENDC/P.V.370.
10.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization52 (4): 887–917.
FloriniAnn. 1996. ‘The Evolution of International Norms’. International Studies Quarterly40 (3): 363–89.
13.
GoertzGaryDiehlF. Paul. 1992. ‘Toward a Theory of International Norms: Some Conceptual and Measurement Issues’. Journal of Conflict Resolution36 (4): 634–64.
14.
GyngellAllan. 2009. ‘The Norm Entrepreur’, Australian Book Review, No. 309, March.
15.
JacksonRobertSorensenGeorg. 2010. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
JainJ.P.1974. Nuclear India Volume II. New Delhi: Radiant Publishers.
17.
KalyanaramanS.2014. ‘Nehru’s Advocacy of Internationalism and Indian Foreign Policy’. In India’s Grand Strategy, edited by BajpaiKantiBasitSairaKrishnappaV.London, New York and New Delhi: Routledge.
18.
KratochwilFriedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions on the Condition and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KumarA. Vinod. 2014. India and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. The Perennial Outlier. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
MEA (Ministry of External Affairs). 1978. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, ‘Quest for Peace’, Speech by Prime Minister Morarji Desai at the Special Session on Disarmament, New York, 9 June, accessed from http://www.indianembassy.org/policy/Disarmament/disarm11.htm (accessed on 20March2009).
22.
MEA (Ministry of External Affairs). 1982. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, ‘Disarmament: An urgent concern’, Statement by P.V. Narasimha Rao, Minister for External Affairs, at the Second Special Session on Disarmament, New York, June 11, accessed from http://www.indianembassy.org/policy/Disarmament/disarm12.htm (accessed on 20March2009).
23.
MearsheimerJohn. 1994–95. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’. International Security19 (3): 5–49.
24.
MullerHaraldFeyMarcoRauchCarsten. 2013. ‘Winds of Change: Exogenous Events and Trends as Norm Triggers’. In Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control, edited by MullerHaraldWunderlichCarmen. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press, 141–60.
OnufNicholas. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of North Carolina Press.
27.
PerkovichGeorge. 1999. India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact on Global Proliferation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
Pugwash India. 2011. ‘Informal Group on Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s Action Plan for a Nuclear-Weapons-Free and Nonviolent World Order 1988 (Rgap 88)’, Report of the Informal Group on RGAP 88, accessed fromhttp://www.pugwashindia.org/images/uploads/Report.pdf (accessed on 17August2014).
RamannaRaja. 1991. Years of Pilgrimage. New Delhi: Viking.
31.
RuggieJohn G.1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic System’. International Organization36 (2): 379–415.
SinghGopalSharmaS.K. (Eds). 2000. Documents on India’s Nuclear Disarmament Policy (Vol. I). New Delhi: Anamika Publishers and Distributors.
34.
SmithRoger K.1987. ‘Explaining the Non-proliferation Regime: Anomalies for Contemporary International Relations Theory’. International Organization41 (2): 253–81.
35.
SnidalDuncan. 1985. ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability’. International Organization29 (4): 579–614.
US Department of State. 1963. ‘Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapon Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water’, accessed fromhttps://www.state.gov/t/isn/4797.htm (accessed on 15January2016).
38.
Van WykJo-AnsieKinghornLindaHepburnHolliePayneClarenceShamChris. 2007. ‘The International Politics of Nuclear Weapons: A Constructivist Analysis’. South African Journal of Military Sciences35 (1): 23–45.
39.
VargheseB.G.2010. First Draft: Witness to the Making of Modern India. Chennai: Tranquebar.
40.
VishwanathanArun. 2009. ‘India and the Nuclear Suppliers Group’. In India in a Changing Global Nuclear Order, edited by GuptaArvind. New Delhi: Academic Foundation, 109–27.
41.
WendtAlexander. 1992. ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization46 (2): 391–425.
42.
WendtAlexander. 1995. ‘Constructing International Politics’. International Security20 (1): Summer, 71–81.
43.
WendtAlexander. 2001. ‘Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design’. International Organization55 (4): 1019–49.
44.
WunderlichCarmen. 2013. ‘Theoretical Approaches in Norm Dynamics’. In Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control, edited by MullerHaraldWunderlichCarmen, 20–46. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.
