‘Gender stereotyping’ refers to the generalised perception or presumption of qualities or traits held by men and women, as well as the functions that are or should be undertaken by men and women. Such gender differences are social and cultural constructs. Gender stereotyping is a common phenomenon, and even the judiciary is not immune to it. Despite many reforms, gender stereotyping persists, together with misconceptions, in the various stages of prosecution, trial and sentencing in sexual assault cases. Using the doctrinal method of research, this article analyses the influence of judges’ gender prejudices in the hearings and outcomes of sexual assault cases in Indian courts. The article shows that the current legal framework is ineffective in removing preconceived sexist prejudices among judges when dealing with cases related to crimes against women.
AbramsD., VickyG. T., MasserB., & BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125.
2.
AdlerZ. (1987). Rape on trial. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3.
BarretoM., & EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633‒642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
4.
BaxiP. (Ed.) (2014). Public secrets of law: Rape trials in India. Oxford University Press.
5.
BoydE. M. (2010). The good girl–bad girl dichotomy: Sexual double standards, STDs, and stigma management. Symbolic Interaction, 33(2), 333‒336.
6.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.
7.
BurtM. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.2.217
8.
ChennellsR. (2009). Sentencing: The “real rape” myth. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity, 82, 23–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41321365
9.
CookR. J., & CusackS. (2009). Gender stereotyping: Transnational legal perspectives (Pennsylvania studies in human rights). University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.
CusackS. (2014). Eliminating judicial stereotyping: Equal access to justice for women in gender-based violence cases. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 9 June 2014. https://rm.coe.int/1680597b20
11.
DeutschH. (1944/1945). The psychology of women (2 vols.). Grune & Stratton.
12.
DhebarP., & DubeyS. (2021). Mohit Subhash Chavan v. State of Maharashtra: Protection or prosecution?International Journal of Law, Management and Humanities, 4(2), 721–726. https://doi.one/10.1732/IJLMH.26157
13.
DuttaD. (2018). Another story of the open letter: An inheritance of relationship-making. Jindal Global Law Review, 9(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-018-0080-4
14.
EaglyA. H., & MladinicA. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154008
15.
EstrichS. (1986). Rape. The Yale Law Journal, 95(6), 1087. https://doi.org/10.2307/796522
16.
FiskeS. T., & GlickP. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organisational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 97–115.
17.
FreudS. (1925). Some psychical consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. Hogarth Press.
18.
GergerH., KleyH., BohnerG., & SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behaviour, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
19.
GiacopassiD. J., & WilkinsonK. R. (1985). Rape and the devalued victim. Law and Human Behaviour, 9(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01044477
20.
GlickP., & FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
21.
GlickP., & FiskeS. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In ZannaM.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press.
22.
GlickP., Sakalli-UgurluN., FerreiraM. C., & SouzaM. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297.
23.
GordonL. P. (2002). Violence against women. Nova Science Pub Inc.
24.
GordonM. T., & RigerS. (1991). The female fear: The social cost of rape. University of Illinois Press.
25.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114A.
26.
KannabiranK., & MenonR. (2007). From Mathura to Manorama: Resisting violence against women in India. Women Unlimited.
27.
KannanJ. (2021). A textbook of medical jurisprudence and toxicology. LexisNexis.
28.
Law Commission of India (1980). Report on rape and allied offences (No. 84).
29.
Nack, Adina. (2008) Damaged goods? Women living with incurable sexually transmitted diseases. Temple University Press (2008).
30.
Office of the (United Nations) High Commissioner for Human Rights (1996–2021). Gender stereotyping. https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/women/wrgs/pages/genderstereotypes.aspx
31.
PryorJ. B., GeiddJ. L., & WilliamsK. B. (1995). A social-psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69–84.
RuskinS. H. (1941). Analysis of sex offenses among male psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 97(4), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.97.4.955
34.
SakalliN. (2002). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599–610.
35.
SatishM. (2016). Discretion, discrimination and the rule of law: Reforming rape sentencing in India. Cambridge University Press.
36.
ScronceC. A., & CorcoranK. J. (1995). The influence of the victim’s consumption of alcohol on perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape. Violence Against Women, 1(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801295001003004
37.
South Asia Citizens Web. (2020). India: Patriarchal and prejudiced ruling in Crl P No. 2427/2020 ‒ Open letter to Hon’ble Justice Krishna S. Dixit, High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. http://www.sacw.net/article14369.html
38.
StewartM. W., DobbinS. A., & GatowskiS. I. (1996). ‘Real rapes’ and ‘real victims’: The shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02167608
39.
TemkinJ. (2010). ‘And always keep a hold of nurse, for fear of finding something worse’: Challenging rape myths in the courtroom. New Criminal Law Review, 13(4), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.710
40.
TemkinJ., & KrahéB. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: Question of attitude. Hart Publishers.
41.
The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1983, No. 43, Acts of Maharashtra State Legislature, 1983 (India).
42.
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 15(3), 365–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1946.11925649
43.
ValiD., & RizzoN. D. (1991). Apparel as one factor in sex crimes against young females: Professional opinions of U.S. psychiatrists. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x9103500208
44.
VikiG. T., & AbramsD. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
45.
VinselA. (1977). Rape: A review essay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300205
46.
Aparna Bhatt v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (CRL.) No. 31 of 2021.
47.
Jugendra Singh v. State of UP (2012) 6 SCC 297.
48.
Lilu @ Rajesh and Anr v. State of Haryana (2013) 2 SCR 774, (2013) 14 SCC 643.
49.
Mahmood Farooqui v. State (2017) 243 DLT 310.
50.
Madan Kakkad v. Naval Dubey (1992) 3 SCC 204.
51.
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2017) 6 SCC 1.
52.
R v. Seaboyer (1991) 7 C.R. (4th) 117.List separately.
53.
Rafiq v. State of UP, AIR (1981) SC 559. Ditto.
54.
Raja v. State of Karnataka (2016) 10 SCC 506 ditto.
55.
Rakesh B. v. State of Karnataka (Crl. P. No. 2427/2020
56.
Rohit Bansal v. State, 2015.
57.
State of Maharashtra v. Rajendra Jawanmal Gandhi (1997) 8 SCC 386.
58.
State of MP v. Madanlal (2015) 7 SCC 681.
59.
Shimbhu & Anr v. State of Haryana (2016) (4) RCR (CRIMINAL) 103.
60.
Tuka Ram & Anr v. State of Maharashtra (1979) AIR 185.
61.
Vikas Garg and Others v. State of Haryana (2017) (4) RCR (CRIMINAL) 924.
62.
Vikram v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Case No. MCRC-23350-2020.
63.
Vimal Kamble v. Chaluverapinake (2003) DGLS (SC) 8.
