This paper interrogates the semiotics of parenthood based on autoethnography and the understanding of such personal experiences from the standpoint of a participant observer. It attempts to revisit the assumptions regarding parenthood/reproduction from the perspectives of the Hindu family, society and the state. Despite the changes ushered in by industrialisation and a rapidly globalising economy, children in the Indian context (especially sons) are still considered a source of social security, ensuring the continuity of the family, caste, lineage and even of social prestige. Increasingly, modern medicine is a willing ally in playing with women’s bodies to confer parenthood. Further, the paper questions the legal requirements laid down by the Indian state prescribing certain procedures, whereby parenthood is conferred on individuals through adoption. This paper argues that there exists a dialectical relationship between culture, medical technology and the state machinery to complicate the experience of parenthood.
Abortion figures (2014). Abortion for as less as 500 Rs or US $ 10. Retrieved 9May, from http://www.abortioncentre.com/consultationonphone.htm
2.
AmbedkarB.R. (1987). Riddles of Hinduism. In Writings and Speeches (Vol 4). Govt of Maharashtra, India.
3.
BlythE. & LandauR. (Eds). (2009). Faith and fertility, attitudes towards reproductive practices in different religions from ancient to modern times. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
4.
BonnicksenA. (1990). A commentary on four papers on surrogate motherhood. Politics and the Life Sciences, 8(2), 195–198. (In the Politics of Surrogacy Contracts, February), 195–198. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
5.
BumillerE. (1991). May you be the mother of a hundred sons. Delhi: Penguin Books.
6.
ChakravartiUma (1993). Conceptualising brahmanical patriarchy in early India: Gender, caste, class and state. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(14), 579–585.
7.
ChakravartiU. (2015). Of Meta-narratives and ‘master’ paradigms: Sexuality and the reification of women in early India. Retrieved 7March2015, from www.cwds.ac.in/OCPaper/GenderedTransitionsMONOGRAPH.pdf
8.
ChatterjeeP. & JanwalkarM. (2014, February9). The great Indian egg bazar. The Indian Express.
9.
Delhi Council of Child Welfare (DCCW) (2010). Bill No. 134, 23rd July 2010, Delhi.
10.
DubeLeela (1988). On the construction of gender: Hindu girls in patrilineal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(18), 34–36.
11.
GhatwaiM. (2013). Madhya Pradesh: Woman undergoes abortion of 10 foetuses, Bhopal, Tuesday, December 17. Retrieved 14May2014, from http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/mp-woman-undergoes-abortion-of-10-foetuses/1208497/
12.
HancockP.HughesB.JaggerE.PatersonK.RussellR.Tulle-WintonE. & TylerM. (2000). The body, culture and society: An introduction. Philadelphia: Buckingham.
13.
Home study report (2014). Retrieved from cara.nic.in/adoptionfromindia.htm
14.
India Today. (2015). Ramdev’s Putra jeevak beej creates uproar in Rajya Sabha, government assures action. Retrieved 30April2015, from http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/baba-ramdev-putrajeevak-beej-rajya-sabha-kc-tyagi/1/432946.html
15.
IfthekharJ.S. (2015, December7). The deadly preference for male children in our society. The New Indian Express.
16.
Indian Kanoon (2008). Supreme Court of India, Baby Manji Yamada vs Union Of India & Anr on 29 September, 2008 Bench: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma. Retrieved 7March2015, from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/854968/
17.
Indians Shopping for Brahmin Sperm? (2012). Retrieved 26May2012, from http://www.siliconindia.com/news/general/Indians-Shopping-for-Brahmin-Sperm-nid-116484-cid-1.html
18.
KakkarS. (1981). The inner world: A psycho-analytic study of childhood and society in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
Kari Points (2014). Commercial surrogacy and fertility tourism In India, the case of baby Manji. Retrieved 13May2014, from https://web.duke.edu/kenanethics/CaseStudies/BabyManji.pdf
20.
LeonI. G. (2002). Adoption losses: Naturally occurring or socially constructed?Child Development, The Society for Research in Child Development, 73(2March–April), 652–663.
21.
MarthaF. (1995). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge.
22.
MayneJ. D. (1999). Adoption in India. Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, New Series, 1(2), 237–239, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
MenonD. (2014, April26). Book review ‘One Part Woman’, by Perumal Murugan. The Indian Express.
24.
MerrickJ. (1990). Selling reproductive rights: Policy issues in surrogate motherhood. Politics and the Life Sciences, 8(2) (The Politics of Surrogacy Contracts, February), 161–172. Retrieved 15May2014, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences
25.
NaqviF. (2014). Who killed baby Falak. Retrieved 15May2014, from http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/who-killed-baby-falak/article3009764.ece
26.
NDTV (2017). Fair complexion requested for egg donors. Photos arrive on phone quickly, Thomson Reuters Foundation, 19January2017. Retrieved 20January2017, from http://everylifecounts.ndtv.com/fair-complexion-in-demand-for-egg-donors-in-gurugram-rs-35000-per-donation-9283
27.
PandeA. (2010). ‘At least I am not sleeping with anyone’: Resisting the stigma of commercial surrogacy in India. Feminist Studies, 36(2) (Re-Inventing Mothers, Summer), 292–312.
28.
ReedM.N. & KapurD. (2015, January26). The love for sons and appropriate attire. The Hindu.
29.
RegeS. (2013). Against the madness of Manu: Ambedkar’s writings against Brahmanical patriarchy. Delhi: Navayana.
30.
RTI (2011). RTI addressed to the Central Public Information Officer, Central Adoption Resource Authority, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India 25th November (both RTIs are addressed to different offices).
31.
RTI (2012). Response to the RTI from the Welfare Home for Children-dated 19th December 2011, from CARA dated 13th January 2012.
32.
Sakshi (2015). Children are sold here, Delhi, 31 December. (Translation from Telugu.)
33.
SpilkerK.RavnM. N. & LieM. (2007). Bibliography on ART. Norwegian Research Council 2002–2006.
34.
SquireS. A. (2008, July24). Interview. Retrieved 28March2010, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1038090/The-great-taboo-Why-childless-women-treated-like-second-class-citizens.html, Updated: 07:53 GMT.
35.
The Hindu (2015, April4). India may get first baby from uterus transplantation by 2018.
36.
The Sunday Express (2015, December13). Families, made in India. A surrogate observed that the IVF centre sends her Rs. 5000 per month for her diet which she never enjoyed when she had her biological children. I am more careful now than during my last pregnancy.
37.
The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (2014). Regulation Bill. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Govt. of India, New Delhi, 2010. Retrieved 16May2015, from http://icmr.nic.in/guide/ART%20REGULATION%20Draft%20Bill1.pdf
38.
UNICEF (2011). The State of the World’s Children. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/pdfs/SOWC-2011-Main-Report-chapter-2_12082010.pdf
39.
UtkarshA. (2014, February19). Children adopted by Muslims are not on par with biological child, Supreme Court. The Indian Express.
40.
Vicky Donor (2012) Hindi language film. Directed by SircarShoojit and produced by AbrahamJohn.
41.
YalmanN. (1962). On the purity of women in the castes of Ceylon and Malabar. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 93, 25–28.
