This article looks at aspects of gendered spatial access and appropriation to understand how spatial dynamics and mobility can be comprehended from a study of and observations on the life experiences of women videographers of VideoSEWA in Ahmedabad, India. The roaming subject, socially defined by class, caste, age and other factors is equally a socially located person who is a traveller. Using the concepts of separation, liminality and re-assimilation (Turner, 1967) through the prism of heterotopic space (Foucault, 1967), this article interrogates the widening of women’s local spaces to translocal ones, their increased radii of mobility, the transference of spatial experiences to the local spheres and the contribution of all of these to the making of physical spatial claims by women. It highlights the importance of an intersectional analysis for understanding relationships between gender, space, mobility and resistance.
Abu-LughodLila (1986). Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
3.
Abu-LughodLila (2006). The Muslim woman: The power of images and the danger of pity. Eurozine. Retrieved 19April2016, from http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2006-09-01-abulughod-en.html
4.
ArendtH. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BanerjeeA. & RajuS. (2009). Gendered mobility: Women migrants and work in urban India. Economic and Political Weekly, 64(28), 115–23.
6.
BaumannZ. (1998). Globalisation. The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
BaviskarA. (1995). In the belly of the river. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
8.
BeckmannJ. (2004). Mobility and safety. Theory Culture Society, 21(4/5), 81–100.
9.
BourdieuP.AcardoA.BalazsG.BeaudS.BonvinF.BourdieuE. … and WacquantL.J.D. (1999). The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (trans. FergusonP. P.EmanuelS.JohnsonJ. & WarynS. T.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
ChenM. A. (Ed). (1998). Widows in India: Social neglect and public action. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
11.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Boston & London: Unwin Hyman.
12.
CostanzoC. (2010). Rethinking courtship, marriage and divorce in an Indian call centre. In MinesD. & LambS. (Eds), Everyday life in South Asia (pp. 50–61). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
13.
de CerteauMichel (1984). The practice of everyday life (vol. 1) (trans. RendallS.), Berkeley, Los Angeles, US: University of California Press.
14.
DuranJane (1998). Philosophies of science/ feminist theories. Boulder: Westview.
15.
FlammM. & KaufmannV. (2006). Operationalising the concept of motility: A qualitative study. Mobilities, 1(2), 167–89.
16.
FoucaultM. (1967). Des Espace Autres Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité [Of other spaces, heterotopias] (trans. MiskowiecJ.5, pp. 46–49). Retrieved 11August2006, from http://foucault.info/documents/heteroTopia/foucault.heteroTopia.en.html
17.
FoucaultM. (1998). Different spaces. In FaubionJ. (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Aesthetics, method and epistemology. London: Penguin.
18.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19.
HardingS. (Ed.) (1987). Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
20.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
HessiniLeila (1994). Wearing the hijab in contemporary Morocco: Choice and identity. In GocekF.M. & BalaghiS. (Eds) Reconstructing gender in the Middle East: Tradition, identity and power. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
HirschmannN. (1997). Feminist standpoint as postmodern strategy. Women and Politics, 18(3), 73–92.
23.
KhanS. (2007). Negotiating the Mohalla: Exclusion, identity and Muslim women in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(17), 1527–33.
24.
LatourB. (1990). Drawing things together. In LynchM. & WoolgarS. (Eds), Representation in Scientific Practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
LefebvreHenri (1991 [1974]) The Production of Space (trans. Nicholson-SmithD.). Oxford, UK, Cambridge; MA, USA: Blackwell.
26.
MankekarP. (2010). Becoming entrepreneurial subjects: Neoliberalism and the media. In GuptaA. & SivaramakrishnanK. (Eds), The state in India after liberalisation (pp. 213–31). London: Routledge.
27.
MenonR. & KhanA. (2015). That dingy bus stop is hindering India’s progress – An economic case for safe public transport /CITYFIX:17.8.15, World Resources Institute, WRI Ross Centre for Sustainable Cities. Retrieved from http://thecityfix.com/blog/dingy-bus-stop-hindering-india-economic-case-safe-public-transport-ranjana-menon-azra-khan/
28.
MohantyC. T. (1991). Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In MohantyC.T.RussoA. & TorresL. (Eds), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 314–27). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29.
MooreH. (1994). A passion for difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30.
OakleyA. (2004). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms (and a subsequent exchange with Joanna Malseed). In SealeC. (Ed.), Social research methods: A reader (pp. 261–68). London: Routledge.
31.
OrtnerS. (2000). Some futures of anthropology. American Ethnologist, 26(4), 984–991.
32.
PandeR. & MooreC. T. (2015, August25). Why aren’t Indian women working?Deccan Herald. Retrieved from http://www.deccanherald.com/content/497084/why-arent-indias-women-working.html
33.
PatelR. (2010). Working the night shift: Women in India’s call centre industry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34.
PhadkeS. (2005). You can be lonely in a crowd: The production of safety in Mumbai. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 12(1), 41–62.
35.
PinkS. (2001). Visual ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.
36.
RanadeS. (2007). The way she moves: Mapping the everyday production of gender-space. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(17), 1519–1526.
37.
RahejaG. G. & GoldG. A. (1994). Listen to the Heron’s words; Reimagining gender and kinship in north India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
SankrityayanR. (1948 [1994]). Ghummakkad shastra (The wanderer’s manifesto/holy book). Delhi: Kitab Mahal.
39.
SankrityayanR. (n.d.) Athato Ghummakkad, Jigyasa. Retrieved 27September2016, from http://www.abhivyakti-hindi.org/snibandh/2002/ghummakkad/ghummakad1.htm
40.
SkeggsB. (1994). Situating the production of feminist ethnography. In MaynardM. & PurvisJ. (Eds), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 72–92). London: Taylor and Francis.
41.
SrivastavaS. (2005). Ghummakkads, a woman’s place, and the LTC-walas: Towards a critical history of ‘home’ ‘belonging’ and ‘attachment’. Contributions to Indian Sociology. 39(3), 375–405.
SudarshanR. & BhattacharyaS. (2009). Through the magnifying glass: Women’s work and labour force participation in urban Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 64(48), 59–66.
44.
SzerszynskiB. & UrryJ. (2006). Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: inhabiting the world from afar. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1March), 113–131.
45.
TacchiJ.KitnerK. R. & CrawfordK. (2012). Meaningful mobility: Gender, development and mobile phones. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 528–537.
46.
TurnerV. W. (1967). Rites de passage. The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. New York: Ithaca.
