This discussion draws upon research conducted in Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad in 2014 with approximately 30 members of trans*1 communities and examines the historical and contemporary politics of naming and its consequences in British India and contemporary Pakistan. I maintain that the colonial state’s view of these communities coincided with regional reformist attempts to curtail their presence in British India. Their marginalised status was challenged in Pakistan2 in 2009, however, when the Supreme Court of the country gave these communities political recognition. Changes in their status, however, I argue, do not give trans* individuals full status as citizens of Pakistan. Instead, the state circumvents existing laws such as Section 377 and the Zina Ordinance to give them status as eunuchs with diseased bodies. While the state appears to direct its agencies to bring into the mainstream individuals identified through the sexually ambiguous category of eunuch, the various naming processes have resulted in the entry of individuals with alternative forms of sexualities into the public space where they demand recognition as legal citizens of Pakistan.
Al GhazaliM. (2001). The socio-political thought of Shah Wali Allah. Islamabad: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Islamic Research Institute.
2.
ArnoldD. (1993). Colonising the body: State, medicine and epidemic diseases in the nineteenth century. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
Asmee. (2014). Interview, Lahore, February.
4.
BallhatchetK. (1980). Race, sex and class under the Raj: Imperial attitudes and policies and their critics, 1793–1905. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
5.
BaqiS., ShahS.A., BaigM.A., MujeebS.A., & MemonA. (1999). Seroprevalence of HIB, HBV and syphilis and associated risk behaviours in male transvestites (Hijras) in Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of STDs & AIDS, 10(5), 300–304.
6.
BarkanE., & BushR. (2002). Claiming the stones, naming the bones: Cultural property and the negotiation of national and ethnic identity. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
7.
BaxiU. (2003). Foreword. Human rights violations against the transgender community, A study of Kothi and Hijra sex workers in Bangalore, India. People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Karnataka (PUCL-K):5-7. Retrieved 15June2012, from http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/PUCL/PUCL%20Report.pdf
8.
Bela. (2014). Interview, Karachi, March.
9.
BokhariA., NizamaniN., JacksonD., RehanN., RehmanM., & MuzaffarR. (2007). HIV risk in Karachi and Lahore, Pakistan: An emerging epidemic in injecting and commercial sex networks. International Journal of STDs & AIDS, 18(7), 486–492.
10.
British Library. (1871). Criminal Tribes Act Act XXVII, V/8/42.
11.
ChatterjeeI. (1999). Gender, slavery and law in colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
12.
ChatterjiShoma. (2008, August18). Eunuchs of India: Deprived of Human Rights. Human Rights Defence: Shielding Humans from Humans. Retrieved 10May2012, from http://www.humanrightsdefence.org/eunuchs-of-india-deprived-of-human-rights.html
13.
Dunya Television. (2012, October15). Dunya @ 8. BobyAlmas and KashishNadeem. Retrieved 19May2014, from http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?138762-Dunya-8-with-Malik-%96-15th-October-2012-Almas-Boby-amp-Nadeem-Kashish
14.
ForbesW. A. (1865). ‘Letter’. Meerut, BL/IOR/483/62, 4December. London: British Library.
15.
FoucaultM. (1976). The history of sexuality: Vol I. London: Penguin Books.
16.
Government of Punjab, India. (1860). Indian Penal Code Act No XLV of 1860. Retrieved 10May2012, from http://punjabrevenue.nic.in/crime1.htm
17.
HaiderM. (2014, April11). Pakistan’s public debt to rise in 2014: World Bank. The International News, Friday. Retrieved 31May2014, from http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-3-243400-Pakistans-public-debt-to-rise-in-2014-World-Bank
18.
HarveyN. (2008, May13). India’s transgendered: The Hijras. New Statesman. Retrieved 6September2015, from http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2008/05/hijras-indian-changing-rights
19.
HenryM. (2003). Where are you really from? Representation, identity and power in the fieldwork experiences of a South Asian diasporic. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 229–242.
20.
JafferyZ. (1996). The invisibles: A tale of the eunuchs of India. New York: Vintage Books.
21.
JansonJamie. (2007, November6). Dismissed Pakistan CJ summons lawyers to ‘stand up for constitution’. Jurist. Retrieved 3June2014, from http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/11/dismissed-pakistan-cj-summons-lawyers.php
22.
Judicial Criminal Department (JCD). (1867). North West Provinces 17 August, BL/IOR/483.62. London: British Library.
23.
Kamini. (2014). Interview, Lahore, February.
24.
KhakiAslam (2014). Interview, Islamabad, March.
25.
KhanA.A., RehanN., QayumK., & KhanA. (2009). Correlates and prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Hijras (male transgenders) in Pakistan. International Journal of STDs & AIDS, 19(12), 817–820.
26.
KhanR. (2014). Interview, Karachi, March.
27.
KhanS. (2006). Zina, transnational feminism, and the moral regulation of Pakistani women. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
28.
LugonesM. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
29.
MarmonS. (1995). Eunuchs and sacred boundaries in Islamic society. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
NadarajaS., & SriskandarajaD. (2005). Liberation struggle or terrorism: The politics of naming the LTTE. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 87–100.
31.
NandaS. (1999). Neither man, nor woman, the Hijras of India. Canada: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
32.
Nimra. (2014). Interview, Lahore, March.
33.
PrestonL. (1987). A right to exist: Eunuchs and the state in nineteenth-century India. Modern Asian Studies, 21(2), 371–387.
34.
RanaB. (2011, November16). Gender interactive alliance visit to NADRA. Karachi. Retrieved 14June2014, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7gReqWcLyY
35.
RanaB. (2014). Interview, Lahore, March.
36.
ReddingJ. (2015). From ‘she-males’ to ‘unix’: Transgender rights and the productive paradoxes of Pakistani policing. In BertiD. & BordiaD. (Eds), Ethnography of criminal cases in South Asia. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
37.
ReddyG. (2007). With respect to sex, negotiating Hijra identity in south India. New Delhi: Yoda Press.
38.
Samira. (2014). Interview, Karachi, March.
39.
Scoop World. (2007, November6). Pakistan: End emergency, restore constitution. Scoop World: Press Release Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 3June2012, from http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0711/S00175.htm
40.
ScottJ. (1985). Weapons of the weak. New Haven: Yale University Press.
41.
Seema (2014). Interview, Lahore.
42.
Shah MardanB. (1862). Letter. Avadh Akhbar. 23July, Lahore Archives.
43.
Suman (2014). Interview, Lahore, February.
44.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC). (2009). Constitution Petition No. 43 of 2009, date of hearing 16June.
45.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC3) (2009). Constitution Petition No. 43 of 2009, date of hearing 20 November.
46.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC2). (2009). Court Petition No. 43/2009, date of hearing 4 November.
47.
Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC1). (2009). Human Rights case No. 63 of 2009, date of hearing 17.
48.
TapariaS. (2011). Emasculated bodies of Hijras: Sites of imposed, resisted and negotiated identities. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18(2), 167–184.
49.
VanitaR. (2012). Gender, sex and the city. New York: Macmillan.
50.
VanitaR., & KidwaiS. (2000). Introduction: Modern Indian materials. In VanitaR. & KidwaiS. (Eds), Same-sex love in India (pp. 191–217). New York: Palgrave.
51.
WhiteheadJ. (1995). Bodies clean and unclean: Prostitution, sanitary legislation, and respectable femininity in colonial north India. Gender and History, 7(1), 41–63.
52.
ZwillingL., & SweetM. J. (1996). Like a city ablaze. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 6(3), 359–384.
