‘Why Should Holidays Come in the Way of School?’ Situating Girls’ Experiences of Schooling

Abstract

This article explores girls’ experiences of schooling in a cluster of villages in the Mahabubnagar district in Telangana, India, arguing that the processual conception of schooling is one that commences before the access of girls to school. It includes the social learning of distributive justice through family, community and religion that influences girls’ perceptions of differential entitlements to educational resources due to their gender. These perceptions are simultaneously reinforced and contested by the school, contouring their engagement with educational resources. Drawing from the theoretical frame of feminist standpoint epistemology this study uses interviews and focus group discussions to engage with its participants. It focuses on the specificities of individual assertions and contestations of girls, as well as the complex responses of affirmation and injunctions of parents, teachers and other members of the community who impact their experiences. In doing so it marks a departure from the linear rhetoric of the dismal experiences of girls and boys in government schools in India.

Keywords

Access experiences girls schooling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alam

(2013). Controlling minds, disciplining bodies: Life inside a Madrasa. In Nambissan

G. B.

Rao

S. Srinivasa

(Eds), Sociology of education in India changing contours and emerging concerns (pp. 224–244). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Balagopalan

(2005). An ideal school and the schooled ideal: Education at the margins. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 82–98). New Delhi: SAGE.

Bandyopadhyay

Subrahmanian

(2011). Gender equity in education. In Govinda

(Ed.), Who goes to school? Exploring exclusion in Indian education (pp. 123–165). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Benei

(2005). Serving the nation: Gender and family values in military schools. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 149–151). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Chatterjee

(1989). The nationalist resolution of the woman’s question. In Sangari

Vaid

(Eds), Recasting women: Essays in Indian colonial history (pp. 233–253). New Delhi: Kali for Women.

Devault

M. L.

(2004). Talking and listening from women’s standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. In Leckenby

Biber

S. N. Hesse

(Eds), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 227–250). New York: Oxford University Press.

Forbes

(2007). Education for women. In Sarkar

Sarkar

(Eds), Women and social reform in modern India (Vol. 1, pp. 83–112). New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Gupta

(2014). Ethos as a gendering device Muslims girls in a minority school. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIX(32), 65–72.

Hameed

(2005). Learning processes within ustad-shagird relationship. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 197–215). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

10.

Hasan

Menon

(2005). Educating Muslim girls: A comparison of five Indian cities. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.

11.

Jeffery

(2005). Introduction: Hearts, minds and pockets. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 13–38). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

12.

Karlekar

(1983). Education and inequality. In Beteille

(Ed.), Equality and inequality—theory and practice (pp. 182–242). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

13.

Karlekar

(2005). Educational structures. In Khullar

(Ed.), Writing the women’s movement: A reader (pp. 243–248). New Delhi: Zubaan.

14.

Kumar

(2010). Culture, state and girls: An educational perspective [Special Issue]. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(17), 75–84.

15.

MacDougall

(2005). Doon school aesthetics. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 121–140). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

16.

Majumdar

(2011). From access to attainment. In Banerjee

Sen

Dhawan

(Eds), Mapping the field: Gender relations in contemporary India (Vol. 1, pp. 113–136). Kolkata: School of Women’s Studies, Jadavpur University.

17.

Minault

(1998). Secluded scholars women’s education and Muslim social reform in colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

18.

Page

(2005). Negotiation and compromise: Gender and government elementary education. In Chopra

Jeffery

(Eds), Educational regimes in contemporary India (pp. 178–198). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

19.

Papanek

(1990). To each less than she needs, from each more than she can do: Allocations, entitlements, and value. In Tinker

(Ed.), Persistent inequalities women & world development (pp. 162–181). New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Pateman

Carole

. (1989). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. In The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. California: Stanford University Press.

21.

Plan International (2012). Because I am a girl: The state of the world’s girls. Learning for life. Retrieved from http://plan-international.org/girls/pdfs/2012-report/The-State-of-the-World-s-Girls-Learning-for-Life-Plan-International-2012.pdf

22.

Sen

(2000). Development as freedom. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

23.

Sen

(2002). A father’s duty: State, patriarchy and women’s education. In Bhattacharya

(Ed.), Education and the disprivileged: Nineteenth and twentieth century India (pp. 197–236). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

24.

Seth

(2007). Gender and nation: Debating female education. In Subject lessons: The Western education of colonial India (pp. 129–158). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.