This article focuses on the nature of 18th century Jaipur society through the lens of gender relations. In Jaipur, the Kachchwaha state protected women against domestic abuse, sexual harassment and caste infractions. I argue that the state maintained control by articulating an interventionist role in the day-to-day lives of their subjects, without mediation of caste councils or the Brahmanical authorities. Through the rhetoric of upholding moral order in society, the Jaipur state was successful in legitimising its rule with expediency and minimal aggression. The state closely monitored the social interactions of their subjects and routinely resolved issues arising out of family disputes, domestic abuse, marital problems and inter-caste marriages. Individuals faced fines, ostracism as well as imprisonment as penalties. Men and women were punished according to their crimes, irrespective of their caste status in the Jaipur state.
AndersonP. (1974), Lineages of the absolutist state. London: Verso.
2.
BuhlerG. (Trans.). (1886). Laws of Manu (Manusmriti) (Chapter 10, Clause Nos. 118 and 119). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
ChakravartiU. (1995). Wifehood, widowhood, and adultery: Female sexuality, surveillance and the state in 18th century Maharashtra. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 29(1 and 2), 3–21.
4.
ChakravartiU. (2003). Pre-colonial structures of caste and gender: An eighteenth century example. In Gendering caste: Through a feminist lens (pp. 105–113). Calcutta: Stree.
5.
DirksN. (1987). The hollow crown: Ethno-history of an Indian kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
GordonS. (1994). Marathas, marauders and state formation in eighteenth century India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7.
GuhaS. (1995). An Indian penal regime: Maharashtra in the eighteenth century. Past and Present, 147(May), 101–126. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/i226674 (accessed on 17 June 2014).
8.
HabibI. (2002). Confronting colonialism: Resistance and modernisation under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan. New Delhi: Anthem Press.
9.
HeestermanJ. C.van den HoekA. W.OortM. S.KolffD. H. A. (Eds) (1992). Ritual, state, and history in South Asia: Essays in honour of J. C. Heesterman. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
10.
HorstsmannM. (2006). 13th Gonda Lecture: Visions of kingship in the twilight of Mughal rule. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Science.
11.
ImamF. (2008). Institutionalizing rajadharma: Strategies of sovereignty in the eighteenth century Jaipur (Unpublished dissertation). University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
12.
ImamF. (2009). Law and administrative practices: Institutionalizing sovereignty in eighteenth century India. In JoshiV.SinghS. (Eds), Culture, polity, and economy (pp. 109–144). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
13.
IndenR. (1998). Ritual, and authority and cyclic time in Hindu kingship. In RichardsJ. F. (Ed.), Kingship and authority in South Asia (pp. 28–73). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
14.
KadamV. S. (1998). The institution of marriage and position of women in eighteenth century Maharashtra. The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 5(3), 341–370.
15.
KarashimaN. (Ed.). (1999). Kingship in Indian history. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers & Distributors.
16.
KumarN. (2003). Crime and gender in eighteenth century Rajasthan. Indian Historical Review, 30(1 and 2), 40–54.
17.
MenonD. (1999). Houses by the sea: State formation experiments in Malabar 1760–1800. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(29), 1995–2003.
18.
PeabodyN. (2003). Hindu kingship and polity in pre-colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
PerlinF. (1985). State formation reconsidered: Part 2. Modern Asian Studies, 19(3), 432–433.
20.
SahaiN. (2007). The other culture: Craft societies and widow remarriage in early modern India. Journal of Women’s History, 19(2), 36–58.
ShulmanD. (1992). Symbols of substance: Court and state in Nayaka period Tamilnadu. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
23.
SinghD. (2003). Regulating the domestic: Notes on the pre-colonial state and family. Studies in History, 19(1), 69–86.
24.
SinghD. (2005). State and society in medieval Rajasthan. In GrewalJ. S. (Ed.), The state and society in medieval India (pp. 235–252). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
25.
SinhaN. (2002). State formation in Rajasthan: Mewar during the seventh-fifteenth centuries. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
26.
SteinB. (1985). State formation and economy reconsidered. Modern Asian Studies, 19(3), 387–413.
27.
SubramanyamS.AlamM. (Eds). (1998). The Mughal empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
TalbotC. (2001). Pre-colonial India in practice: Society, region and identity in Medieval Andhra. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
29.
TodJ. (1920). Annals and antiquities of Rajasthan or the central and western Rajpoot states of India, edited by CrookeW.. Oxford: H. Milford Oxford University Press.
30.
WagleN. K. (1998). Women in the kotwal’s papers, Pune, 1767–1791. In FeldhausA. (Ed.), Images of women in Maharashtrian society (pp. 15–60). New York: Suny University Press.
31.
WinkA. (1986). ‘Introduction’,Land and sovereignty: Agrarian society and politics under the 18th century Maratha Svaraja. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
WittfogelK. (1957). Oriental despotism: A comparative study of total power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
