In this study of surrogate mothers in Gujarat, India, I introduce the concept of ‘sexualised care work’ to describe a new type of care work—commercial surrogacy—that is similar to existing forms of care work but is stigmatised in the public imagination, among other reasons, because of its parallels with sex work. I use the oral histories of the surrogates to examine the accounts they give, justifying their work and resisting stigma. I argue that while the narratives can be seen as a form of resistance, they reinforce the primary identity of these women as dependent mothers rather than independent workers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E.1990. ‘
Is Women's Labor a Commodity?
’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(1):
71–92
.
2.
Andrews, L.B.1987. ‘
The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood
’, Hastings Center Report, 17(5):
31–40
.
3.
Anleu, S.R.1992. ‘
For Love but Not for Money?
’, Gender and Society, 6(1):
30–48
.
4.
Ashforth, B.E.
and
G.E. Kreiner
. 1999. ‘
“How Can You Do It?” Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity
’, The Academy of Management Review, 24(3):
413–34
.
5.
Baker, B.M.1996. ‘
A Case for Permitting Altruistic Surrogacy
’, Hypatia, Spring, pp.
34–48
.
6.
Bhargav, P.2006. ‘Gujarat becomes the Preferred Medical Tourism Destination’, Canada Free Press, http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/india120706.htm, accessed 6 April 2007.
7.
Bollywoodgate. http://www.bollywoodgate.com/indian-tv-serials/mamta.html, accessed 26 July 2007.
8.
Burawoy, M.1991. Ethnography Unbound.
Berkeley: University of California
.
9.
Chang, G.2000. Disposable Domestics: Immigrant Women Workers in the Global Factory.
Cambridge: South End Press
.
10.
Corea, Gene
. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs.
New York: Harper & Row
.
11.
Das Gupta, M.1987. ‘
Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India
’, Population and Development Review, 13(1):
77–100
.
12.
Dworkin, A.1978. Right Wing Women.
New York: Perigree Books
.
13.
Ehrenreich, B.
and
A. Hochschild
(eds). 2003. Global Women: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy.
New York: Metropolitan Books
.
14.
Gamburd, M.2000. The Kitchen Spoon's Handle.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
15.
George, Sheba
. 2000. ‘“Dirty Nurses” and “Men who Play”’, in
M. Burawoy
,
J. Blum
,
S. George
,
Z. Gille
,
M. Thayer
,
T. Gowan
,
L. Haney
,
M. Klawiter
,
S. Lopez
and
S. Riain
(eds), Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections and Imaginations in a Postmodern World, pp. 144–74.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
16.
Glenn, E.N.1992. ‘
From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproduction Labor
’, Signs, 18(1):
1–43
.
17.
Goffman, E.1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
.
18.
Hochschild, A.R.1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
19.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P.
and
E. Avila
. 2003. ‘“I'm Here, but I'm There”: The Meanings of Transnational Latina Motherhood’, in
P. Hondagneu-Sotelo
(ed.), Gender and US Immigration, pp. 317–40.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
20.
Hughes, E.C.1951. ‘Work and the Self’, in
J.H. Rohrer
and
M. Sherif
(eds), Social Psychology at the Crossroads, pp. 313–23.
New York: Harper and Brothers
.
21.
ICMR. 2005. ‘National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision & Regulation of ART Clinics in India’, http://www.icmr.nic.in/art/art_clinics.htm, accessed 13 June 2007.
22.
Jeffery, P.2001. ‘Agency, Activism and Agendas’, in
P. Jeffery
and
A. Basu
(eds), Resisting the Sacred and the Secular: Women's Activism and Political Religion, pp. 42–57.
New Delhi: Kali for Women
.
23.
Jeffery, P.
and
R. Jeffery
. 1996. Don't Marry Me to a Plowman: Women's Everyday Lives in Rural North India.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press
.
24.
Lamont, M.2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class and Immigration.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation
.
25.
Lamont, M.
and
M. Fournier
(eds). 1992. Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
26.
Markens, S.2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
27.
Neuhaus, R.J.1988. ‘
Renting Women, Buying Babies and Class Struggles
’, Society, 25(3):
8–10
.
28.
Nussbaum, M.1998. ‘
Whether from Reason or Prejudice: Taking Money for Bodily Services
’, Journal of Legal Studies, 27(2):
693–724
.
29.
Pande, A.2008. ‘Commercial Surrogate Mothering in India: Nine Months of Labor?’ in
Kenji Kosaka
and
Masahiro Ogino
(eds), Quest for Alternative Sociology, pp. 71–88.
Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press
.
30.
Parrenas, R.2001. Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration and Domestic Work.
Stanford: Stanford University Press
.
31.
Pun, N.2005. Made in China: Women Factory Workers in the Global Workplace.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
32.
Ragone, H.1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press
.
33.
Raymond, J.1993. Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle Over Women's Freedom.
San Francisco: Harper Collins
.
34.
Roberts, E.F.1997. ‘“Native” Narratives of Connectedness: Surrogate Motherhood and Technology’, in
J. Dumit
and
R. Davis-Floyd
(eds), Cyborg Babies: From Techno-Sex to Techno-Tots, pp. 193–211.
New York: Routledge
.
35.
Rothman, B.K.1988. ‘Reproductive Technology and the Commodification of Life’, in
E. Hoffman Baruch
,
A.F. D'Amadeo Jr.
and
J. Seager
(eds), Embryos, Ethics and Women's Rights: Exploring the New Reproductive Technologies, pp. 95–100.
London: Harrington Park Press
.
36.
Scott, J.C.1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance.
New Haven: Yale University Press
.
37.
Singh, M.K.2007. ‘
New laws to rein in “womb business”
’, The Times of India, 31 October.
38.
Smith, A.1985. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Letters, edited by J.C. Bryce, Vol. IV of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith.
Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
.
39.
Spar, D.L.2006. The Baby Business: How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception.
Harvard, Cambridge, Mass: Business School Publishing Corporations
.
40.
Strathern, M.1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies.
New York: Routledge
.
41.
Sunder Rajan, R.2000. ‘
Introduction: Feminism and the Politics of Resistance
’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 7(2):
153–65
.
42.
Sykes, G.M.
and
Matza, D.1957. ‘
Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency
’, American Sociological Review, 22(1957):
664–70
.
43.
Thompson, William
,
Jack Harred
,
Barbare E. Burks
. 2003. ‘
Managing the Stigma of Topless Dancing: A Decade Later
’, Deviant Behaviour, 24:
551–70
.
44.
Unnithan Kumar, M.
(ed.). 2004. ‘Introduction’, in Reproductive Agency, Medicine and the State: Cultural Transformations in Childbearing, pp. 1–23.
New York: Beghahn Books
.
45.
Wajcman, Judy
. 1994. ‘Delivered into Men's Hands? The Social Construction of Reproductive Technology’, in
G. Sen
and
R. Snow
(eds), Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction, pp. 153–75,
Cambridge: Harvard School of Public Health
.
46.
Wright, M.2006. Disposable Women and Other Myths of Global Capitalism.
New York: Routledge
.
