The aim of the present study is to examine whether the established fact that men by far outnumber women in leading positions is an inherent unintentional characteristic of a hierarchy where appointments happen one by one on an individual basis, as opposed to boards where the members are appointed as a group. The sample consists of those appointed to the hierarchies as well as the boards of 36 state universities in Sweden. The main finding is that significantly more men are appointed in hierarchies than to group-composed boards. When the gendered distribution of those in leading positions becomes fully apparent, the last and final position in the hierarchy is significantly more often given to a woman. However, these women are much older than their male counterparts, a fact that makes it harder for them to reach the final step of the ladder. The article concludes with a discussion of whether the higher probability of appointing a woman as vice-president when both chair and president are men is a fair acknowledgement of an unfair gender distribution, or if there are other possible explanations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, J.
and
D.R. Van Houten.1974. ‘
Differential Recruitment and Control: The Sex Structuring of Organizations
’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2):
152–63
.
2.
A˚hmansson, G.
and
L.S. öhlund.2000. ‘
öka kvinnors möjlighet att bli professorer’ (Increase Women's Possibilities to Become Professors)
, Lärarnas tidning, 2:
47
.
3.
Alimo-Metcalf, B.1995. ‘
An Investigation of Female and Male Constructs of Leadership and Empowerment
’, Women in Management Review,10(2):
3–8
.
4.
Amidu, M.
and
J. Abor.2006. ‘
Gender and Composition of Corporate Boards: A Ghanaian Study
’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1):
83–95
.
5.
Bain, O.
and
W. Cummings.2000. ‘
Academe's Glass Ceiling: Societal, Professional- Organizational, and Institutional Barriers to the Career Advancement of Academic Women
’, Comparative Education Review, 44(4):
493–514
.
6.
Brown, K.
and
S. Ridge.2002. ‘
Moving into Management: Gender Segregation and its Effect on Managerial Attainment
’, Women in Management Review, 17(7):
318–27
.
7.
Burness, C.2000. ‘
Young Swedish Members of Parliament: Changing the World?
’, NORA, 8(2):
93–106
.
8.
Duncan, C.
and
W. Loretto.2004. ‘
Never the Right Age? Gender Age-based Discrimination in Employment
’, Gender, Work and Organization, 11(1):
95–115
.
9.
Eagly, A.H.
and
B.T. Johnson.1990. ‘
Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis
’, Psychological Bulletin, 108(2):
233–56
.
10.
Eagly, A.H.
and
S.J. Karau.1991. ‘
Gender and the Emergence of Leaders: A Meta-analysis
’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5):
685–710
.
11.
Eagly, A.H.
,
M.G. Makhijani
and
B.G. Klonsky.1992. ‘
Gender and Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-analysis
’, Psychological Bulletin, 111(1):
3–22
.
12.
Eagly, A.H.
,
S.J. Karau
and
M.G. Makhijani.1995. ‘
Gender and the Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-analysis
’, Psychological Bulletin, 117(1):
125–45
.
13.
Fenwick, G.D.
and
D.J. Neal.2001. ‘
Effect of Gender Composition on Group Performance
’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8(2):
205–25
.
14.
Hall-Taylor, B.1997. ‘
The Construction of Women's Management Skills and the Marginalization of Women in Senior Management
’, Women in Management Review, 12(7):
255–63
.
15.
Hirdman, Y.1990. ‘The Gender System: Theoretical Reflections on the Social Subordination of Women’.
The Study of Power and Democracy in Sweden, English Series, Report no. 40, Maktutredningen, Uppsala
.
16.
Höjgaard, L.2002. ‘
Tracing Differentiation in Gendered Leadership: An Analysis of Differences in Gender Composition in Top Management in Business, Politics and the Civil Service
’, Gender, Work and Organization, 9(1):
15–38
.
17.
Kanter, R.M.1993. Men and Women of the Corporation.New York: Basic Books
.
18.
Kramer, L.A.
and
S. Lambert.2001. ‘
Sex-linked Bias in Chances of Being Promoted to Supervisor
’, Sociological Perspectives, 44(1):
111–27
.
19.
Lanier, P.A.
and
J.R. Tanner.1999. ‘
A Report on Gender and Gender-related Issues in the Accounting Professoriate
’, Journal of Education for Business, 75(2):
76–82
.
20.
Liff, S.
and
I. Cameron.1997. ‘
Changing Equality Cultures to Move Beyond “Women's Problems”
‘, Gender, Work and Organization, 4(1):
35–46
.
21.
Liff, S.
and
K. Ward.2001. ‘
Distorted Views Through the Glass Ceiling: The Construction of Women's Understandings of Promotion and Senior Management Positions
’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8(1):
19–36
.
22.
Lyness, K.S.
and
D.E. Thompson.1997. ‘
Above the Glass Ceiling? A Comparison of Matched Samples of Female and Male Executives
’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3):
359–75
.
23.
Martin, P.Y.
,
J.R. Reynolds
and
S. Keith.2002. ‘
Gender Bias and Feminist Consciousness among Judges and Attorneys: A Standpoint Theory Analysis
’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3):
665–701
.
24.
Maume D.J.1999. ‘
Occupational Segregation and the Career Mobility of White Men and Women
’, Social Forces, 77(4):
1433–60
.
25.
Metcalfe, B.
and
G. Dick.2002. ‘
Is the Force Still with Her? Gender and the Commitment in the Police
’, Women in Management Review, 17(8):
392–403
.
26.
Moore, W.1962. The Conduct of the Corporation.New York: Random House
.
27.
Morley, L.2000. ‘
The Micropolitics of Gender in the Learning Society
’, Higher Education in Europe, 25(2):
229–35
.
28.
Morrison, A.M.
and
M.A. Von Glinow.1990. ‘
Women and Minorities in Management
’, American Psychologist, 45(2):
200–208
.
29.
Osborn, M.2000. ‘Promoting Excellence Through Mainstreaming Gender Equality’, in
A. Colosimo
,
B.B. Degen
and
N. Dewandre
(eds), Women and Science: Making Change Happen( Proceedings of Conference, 3–4 April, Brussels).
Brussels: European Commission
.
30.
Pazy, A.
and
I. Oron.2001. ‘
Sex Proportion and Performance Evaluation among Highranking Military Officers
’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 22(6):
689–702
.
31.
Perry, E.L.
, A. Davis-
Blake
and
C.T. Kulik.1994. ‘
Explaining Gender-based Selection Decisions: A Synthesis of Contextual and Cognitive Approaches
’, Academy of Management Review, 19(4):
786–820
.
32.
Piercy, N.F.
,
N. Lane
and
D.W. Cravens.2002. ‘
A Gender Perspective on Sales-person Organisational Citizenship Behaviour, Sales Manager Control Strategy and Sales Unit Effectiveness
’, Women in Management Review, 17(8):
373–91
.
33.
Reed, V.
and
B. Buddeberg-Fischer.2001. ‘
Career Obstacles for Women in Medicine: An Overview
’, Medical Education, 35(2):
139–47
.
34.
Rees, T.2001. ‘
Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Science in the European Union: The ETAN Report
’, Gender and Education, 13(3):
243–60
.
35.
Rees, T.2002. National Policies on Women and Science in Europe.
Brussels: European Commission
.
36.
Simeonova, K.2000. ‘Scientific Education and Scientific Carriers of Women in the Associated Countries’, in
A. Colosimo
,
B.B. Degen
and
N. Dewandre
(eds), Women and Science: Making Change Happen (Proceedings of the Conference, Brussels, 3–4 April).
Brussels: European Commission
.
37.
Smith, R.A.2002. ‘
Race, Gender, and Authority in the Workplace: Theory and Research
’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1):
509–42
.
38.
Sonnert, G.1995–96. ‘
Gender Equity in Science: Still an Elusive Goal
’, Issues in Science and Technology, 12(2):
53–58
.
39.
Stroh, L.K.
,
J.M. Brett
and
A.H. Reilly.1992. ‘
All the Right Stuff: A Comparison of Female and Male Managers
’ Career Progression’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3):
251–60
.
40.
Tang, J.1997. ‘
The Glass Ceiling in Science and Engineering
’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(4):
383–406
.
Van
Eck, E.
,
M. Volman
and
A. Vermeulen.1996. ‘
The Management Route: Analysing the Representation of Women in Educational Management
’, European Journal of Education, 31(4):
403–17
.
43.
Wickwire, K.S.
and
J.C. Kruper.1996. ‘
The Glass Ceiling Effect: An Approach to Assessment
’, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(1):
32–39
.
44.
Wright, S.C.
and
D.M. Taylor.1998. ‘
Responding to Tokenism: Individual Action in the Face of Collective Injustice
’, European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4):
647–67
.
