Neo-liberal Development and Reproductive Health in India

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the implications of neo-liberalism on women-centred reproductive health programmes, particularly in advancing their goals of political empowerment. The article develops a critique of reproduction and women as citizens of the public space in neo-liberal economies. It argues that the rhetoric of consumer freedom and high-quality services belie women's position as subjects of an economic growth-led society where reproduction is another resource to be harnessed for capitalism. Contrary to feminist intent, the public awareness of the ‘personal’ or the ‘reproductive’ does not necessarily lead to a concomitant enhancement of political aims.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benhabib, S. 1998. ‘Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jurgen Habermas’, in J. Landes (ed.), Feminism, the Public and the Private, pp. 65–99. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press .

Brodie, J. 1994. ‘Shifting the Boundaries: Gender and the Politics of Restructuring’, in I. Bakker (ed.), The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy, pp. 46–59. London: Zed Books .

Brown, W. 1992. ‘ Finding the Man in the State ’, Feminist Studies, 18(1): 7–34 .

Buch, N. 2005. ‘ Law of Two-child Norm in Panchayats: Implications, Consequences and Experiences ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(24): 2421–29 .

Cornia, A. and R. Jolly . 1988. Adjustment with a Human Face. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Gallin, R.S. 1998. ‘ The Gendered Nature of Globalization ’. Article presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Philadelphia, 2–6 December.

Giddens, A. 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .

Government of India. No date. Reproductive and Child Health Programme. New Delhi: Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare .

Government of India. 1992. Action Plan for Revamping the Family Welfare Programme in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare .

10.

Government of India . 1997. ‘Training of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) for “Building Effective Community Partnerships for Implementing the Reproductive and Child Health Programme (RCH)”’. Memo from Deputy Director of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare officially marked as No. M. 14015/7/97 -RCH (DC), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi.

11.

Hartmann, H. 1994. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Cambridge, MA: Southend Press .

12.

HealthWatch Trust. 1999. The Community Needs-based Reproductive and Child Health in India: Progress and Constraints. Jaipur: HealthWatch Trust .

13.

Jennings, A. 1993. ‘Public or Private? Institutional Economics and Feminism’, in M. Ferber and J.A. Nelson (eds.), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, pp. 111–30. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press .

14.

Landes, J. 1998. ‘Introduction’, in J. Landes (ed.), Feminism, the Public and the Private, pp. 1–17. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press .

15.

Merrick, T.M. 1996. ‘Family Welfare Policy Issues’, in A.R. Measham and R.A. Heaver (eds.), Supplement to India's Family Welfare Program: Moving to a Reproductive and Child Health Approach, pp. 13–23. Washington, DC: World Bank .

16.

Miller, B. 1981. The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press .

17.

Needham, C. 2003. ‘Citizen-consumers: New Labour's Marketplace Democracy’. Catalyst Working Particle, http://www.catalystforum.org.uk/pubs/, accessed 10 September 2005.

18.

Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press .

19.

Petchesky, R. 2003. Global Prescriptions: Gendering Health and Human Rights. London: Zed Books .

20.

Rao, M. 2004. From Population Control to Reproductive Health: Malthusian Arithmetic. New Delhi: Sage Publications .

21.

Rao, M. 2006. ‘ Cairo Door Ast? Population Policies and their Context in India after ICPD ’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 13(2): 247–74 .

22.

Ravindran, T.K.S. 1993. ‘ Women and the Politics of Population and Development in India ’, Reproductive Health Matters, 1(1): 26–38 .

23.

Santhya, K.G. 2003. ‘ Changing Family Planning Scenario in India: An Overview of Recent Evidence ’. Population Council Regional Working Articles No. 17, Population Council, New Delhi.

24.

Sama Resource Group for Women and Health. 2005. Beyond Numbers: Implications of the Two-child Norm. New Delhi: Sama Resource Group for Women and Health .

25.

Scott, C. 1996. Gender and Development: Rethinking Modernization and Dependency Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers .

26.

Sen, A. 1990. ‘Gender and Co-operative Conflicts’, in I. Tinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities, pp. 123–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

27.

Simon-Kumar, R. 2006. Marketing Reproduction? Ideology and Population Policy in India. New Delhi: Zubaan Books .

28.

Smyth, I. 1998. ‘Gender Analysis of Family Planning: Beyond the “Feminist vs. Population Control” Debate’, in C. Jackson and R. Pearson (eds.), Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy, pp. 217–38. London and New York: Routledge .

29.

Standing, H. 2000. ‘ Gender Impacts of Health Reforms: The Current State of Policy and Implementation ’. Article presented at the ALAMES meeting, Havana, Cuba, 3–7 July.

30.

Taylor/DAWN. 2000. Marketization of Governance: Critical Perspectives from the South. Fiji: DAWN .

31.

The Hindu. 1999. 14 December.

32.

United Nations. 1995. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development: Cairo: 5–13 September 1994. New York: United Nations .

33.

Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR). 1993. GNRR Newsletter, No. 42, January–March.

34.

World Bank. 1991. Gender and Poverty in India: A World Bank Country Study. Washington, DC: World Bank .

35.

World Bank. 1997. Project Appraisal Document (India: Reproductive and Child Health Project). Washington, DC: Population and Human Resources Operations Division, Country Department II, South Asia Region .

36.

Yeatman, A. 1997. ‘Contract, Status and Personhood’, in G. Davis , B. Sullivan and A. Yeatman (eds.), The New Contractualism, pp. 39–56. Melbourne: Macmillan Education .