Understanding local knowledge systems is fundamentally important to discern the complexities of natural resource management in any locality, and scientists are increasingly becoming interested in these. However, this interest stems from a narrow technology-centred focus. To broaden this focus, it is important to develop a robust conceptual framework that captures the dynamics of these systems. This article attempts to review various ways of conceptualising local knowledges and the intermeshing of gender and local knowledge in a variety of ways. A feminist gender perspective not only unravels the intricacies of the gendering of knowledge, but problematises the unequal distribution of power, control and skills as these are integral elements of the construction, valuation and marginalisation of local knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agarwal, A.1995. ‘
Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
’, Development and Change, 26(3):
413–39
.
2.
Ardener, E.1975. ‘Belief and the Problem of Women’, in
Ardener, S.
(ed.), Perceiving Women, pp. 1–18.
London: Malaby
.
3.
Bebbington, A.J.1994. ‘Composing Rural Livelihoods: From Farming Systems to Food Systems’, in
I. Scoones
and
J. Thompson
(eds), Beyond Farmer First, pp. 88–93.
London: Intermediate Technology Publications
.
4.
Blaikie, P.
,
K. Brown
,
M. Stocking
,
L. Tang
,
P. Dixon
and
P. Sillitoe
. 1997. ‘
Knowledge in Action: Local Knowledge as a Development Resource and Barriers to its Incorporation in Natural Resource Research and Development
’. Agricultural Systems, 55:
217–37
.
5.
Braimoh, A.K.2002. ‘
Integrating Indigenous Knowledge and Soil Science to Develop a National Soil Classification System for Nigeria
’. Agriculture and Human Values, 19:
75–80
.
6.
Gurung, C.
and
N. Gurung
. 2006. ‘The Social and Gendered Nature of Ginger Production and Commercialisation: A Case Study of Rai, Lepcha and Brahmin-Chhetri in Sikkim and Kalimpong, West Bengal, India’, in
R. Veernoy
(ed.), Social and Gender Analysis in Natural Resource Management.
New Delhi and London: Sage
.
7.
Haraway, D.1988. ‘
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question, in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
’. Feminist Studies, 14:
575–99
.
8.
Harding, S.1986. The Science Question in Feminism.
Milton Keynes: Open University Press
.
9.
Hassanein, N.1997. ‘
Networking Knowledge in Sustainable Agriculture Movement: Some Implications of the Gender Dimension
’. Society and Natural Resources, 10:
251–58
.
10.
Howard, P.L.2003. ‘Women and the Plant World: An Exploration’ in
P.L. Howard
, (ed.), Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Bio-diversity Management and Conservation, pp. 1–48.
London and New York: Zed Books
.
11.
Jackson, C.1993. ‘
Doing What Comes Naturally? Women and Environment in Development
’, World Development, 21(12):
1947–63
.
12.
Jewitt, S.2002. Environment, Knowledge and Gender: Local Development in India's Jharkhand.
Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing
.
13.
Kelkar, G.
and
D. Nathan1991. Gender and Tribe, Women, Land and Forests in Jharkhand.
New Delhi: Kali for Women
.
14.
Kloppenburg, J.J.1991. ‘
Social Theory and the De/Reconstruction of Agricultural Science: Local Knowledge for an Alternative Agriculture
’, Rural Sociology, 56(4):
519–48
.
15.
Krishna, S.1998. ‘Arunachal Pradesh’, in
M.S. Swaminathan
(ed.), Gender Dimensions in Bio-diversity Management, pp. 148–81.
New Delhi: Konark Publishers
.
16.
Leckie, G.J.1996. ‘
“They Never Trusted Me to Drive”: Farm Girls and the Gender Relations of Agricultural Information Transfer
’, Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 3:
309–38
.
17.
Long, N.2001. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives.
London: Routledge
.
18.
Mosse, D.1994. ‘
Authority, Gender and Knowledge, Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal
’, Development and Change, 25(3):
497–526
.
19.
Norem, R.H.
,
R. Yoder
and
Y. Martin
. 1989. ‘Indigenous Agricultural Knowledge and Gender Issues in the Third World Agricultural Development’, in
D.M. Warren
,
L.J. Slikkerveer
and
S.O. Titilola
(eds), Indigenous Knowledge Systems: Implications for Agriculture and International Development.
Iowa: Iowa State University Research Foundation
.
20.
Pawluk, R.R.
,
J.A. Sandor
and
J. Tabor
. 1992. ‘
The Role of Indigenous Soil Knowledge in Agricultural Development
’. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 47:
298–303
.
21.
Ramdas, S.
,
Anthra Yakshi
and
Deepika Girijana
. 2001. ‘
Changing Livelihoods, Livestock and Local Knowledge Systems: Women Stake Their Claim in Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra
’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2):
175–94
.
22.
Roling, N.1992. ‘
The Emergence of Knowledge Systems Thinking: A Changing Perception of Relationships among Innovation, Knowledge Process and Configuration
’. Knowledge and Policy, 5:
42–65
.
23.
Scoones, I.
and
J. Thompson1994. ‘Knowledge, Power and Agriculture: Towards a Theoretical Understanding’, in
I. Scoones
and
J. Thompson
(eds), Beyond Farmer First, pp. 16–32.
London: Intermediate Technology Publications
.
Sillitoe, P.1998. ‘
The Development of Indigenous Knowledge: A New Applied Anthropology
’. Current Anthropology, 39:
223–52
.
26.
Sillitoe, P.2003. ‘The Gender of Crops in Papua New Guinea Highlands’, in
P.L. Howard
(ed.), Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Bio-diversity Management and Conservation, pp. 165–76.
London and New York: Zed Books
.
27.
Singh, A.
and
N. Burra
. 1993. Women and Wasteland Development in India.
New Delhi, London: Sage
.
28.
Sumberg, J.
and
C. Okali
. 1997. Farmer's Experiments: Creating Local Knowledge.
Boulder: Lynne Rienner
.
29.
Vedavalli, L.
and
N. Anilkumar
. 1998. ‘Wayanad, Kerala’, in
M.S. Swaminathan
(ed.), Gender Dimensions in Bio-diversity Management, pp. 96–106.
New Delhi: Konark Publishers
.
30.
Warburton, H.
and
A. Martin
. 1999. Local People's Knowledge in Natural Resource Research.
Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute
.
