This article explores the contributions of women in the community development process
in selected rural localities of the Cameroon grasslands. The article situates gender
concerns in community participation, rekindled through village development
associations—vehicles for the mobilisation of social capital directed at
the execution of identified projects. We conclude that women still largely remain on
the sidelines on account of the relative lack of the education, tight schedules,
anachronistic traditions that reinforce male supremacy, lack of finance and
abysmally low representation in village institutional structures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anyanwu, N.1992. Community Development. The Nigerian Perspective.
Ibadan: Gabesther Educational Publishers
.
2.
Bazlul, M.1994. Participation, Development and Social Structure. An Empirical
Study in a Developing Country.
New York: University Press of America
.
3.
Bamberger, M.
,
M. Blacden
and
A. Taddese.1995. Gender Issues in Participation, Social Development Notes No.
12 (Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development
Network of the World Bank )
Washington, DC: World Bank
.
4.
Barker, R.1995. The Social Work Dictionary.
Washington, DC: NASW Press
.
5.
Cohen, J.M.
and
N.T. Uphoff.1977. Rural Development Participation: Concepts and Measures for
Project Design, Implementation and Evaluation (Rural
Development Monograph No. 2).
Ithaca: Rural Development Committee Center for
Inter-national Studies, Cornell University
.
6.
Craig, G.1998.
‘Community Development in a Global Context’
, Community Devel-opment Journal, 33
(1):
2–17
.
7.
Etzioni A.1996.
‘The Responsive Community: A Communitarian Perspective’
, American Sociological Review,
61(99):
1– 11
.
8.
Fonchingong C.
and
L. Fonjong.Forthcoming.The Concept of Self-reliance in Community Development Initiatives in the
Cameroon Grassfields, Geojournal.
Kluwer: Academic Publishers
.
9.
Fonchingong, C.1999.
‘Structural Adjustment, Women and Agriculture in Cameroon’
, Gender and Development,
7(3):
73–79
.
10.
Ghai, D.
and
C. Hewit de Alcantara.1990.
‘The Crisis of the 1980s in Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and
the Caribbean: Economic Impact, Social Change and Political Implications’
, Development and Change,
21(3):
389–426
.
11.
Hyden, G.1983. No Shortcut to Progress: African Development in
Perspective.
London
.
12.
IFAD. 2001. Rural Poverty Report 2001: The Challenge of
Ending Rural Poverty.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
13.
Jua, N.2002.
‘Small is Not Always Beautiful: A Case Study of the Njinikom Area
Development Association’
, Nordic Jounral of African Studies,
11(3):
336–58
.
14.
Korten, D.1980.
‘Community Organisation and Rural Development: A Learning Process’
, Public Administration Review,
40(5):
480–511
.
15.
Mathias, A.
and
Green.1997. Non-governmental Organisations and Health in Developing
Countries.
London: Macmillan Press
.
16.
Mayo, M.1990. Communities and Caring: The Mixed Economy of Welfare.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
17.
MIDENO.1984. Annual Report.
North-West Development Authority, Ministry of Agriculture
.
18.
Narayan-Parker, D.1995. The Contribution of People's Participation: Evidence
from 121 Rural Water Supply Projects (Environmentally
Sustainable Development Occasional Paper Series No. 1).
Washington DC: World Bank
.
19.
Paul, S.1987. Community Participation in Development Projects: The World
Bank Experi-ence (World Bank Discussion Paper No.
6).
Washington, DC: World Bank
.
20.
Shaw, T.M.1993. Reformism and Revisionism in African Political Economy in the
1990s: The Dialectics of Adjustments.
London: Macmillan
.
21.
Streeten, P.1997. Community Participation in Development Projects
(World Bank Discussion Paper).
New York: World Bank
.
22.
UNDP. 1993. Human Development Report.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
23.
UNDP. 1998. Human Development Report: Poverty in
Cameroon.
Yaounde, Cameroon: UNDP
.
24.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED).
1987. Our Common Future.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
25.
World Bank. 1994. World Development Report: Infrastructure for
Development.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
