This study analyses the development and role of social enterprises in the rural areas of the Copperbelt region of Zambia. Against the backdrop of increasing socio-economic challenges and the critical need for innovative food security solutions, this study contributes to the existing literature on social enterprise development in Sub-Saharan Africa. The research employs a qualitative case study approach, focusing on four social enterprises operating in the rural areas of the Copperbelt region. A semi-structured interview guide is used to gather data from key informants. By using components of Giddens’ structural theory, this investigation finds that the development of social enterprises in the rural areas of the Copperbelt region is intricately linked to the local context and conditions in which they operate.
Addae-KorankyeA. (2014). Causes of poverty in Africa: A review of literature. American International Journal of Social Science, 3(7), 147–153.
2.
ArkesteijnM., Van MierloB., & LeeuwisC. (2015). The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation. Evaluation, 21(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014564719
3.
AtiaseV. Y., MahmoodS., WangY., & BotchieD. (2018). Developing entrepreneurship in Africa: Investigating critical resource challenges. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(4), 644–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2017-0084
4.
BacqS., & JanssenF. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5–6), 373–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
5.
BorzagaC., & SacchettiS. (2015). Why social enterprises are asking to be multi-stakeholder and deliberative: An explanation around the costs of exclusion [Euricse Working Papers, 75|15]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2594181
6.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7.
BrymanA., & BellE. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
8.
BullM. (2008). Challenging tensions: Critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14(5), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550810897641
9.
ChandraY., & KerlinJ. A. (2021). Social entrepreneurship in context: Pathways for new contributions in the field. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 14(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1845472
10.
ChenC. C., & MeindlJ. R.1991, The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The Case of Donald Blurr and People’s Express. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 521–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393273
11.
ChiassonM., & SaundersC. (2005). Reconciling diverse approaches to opportunity research using the structuration theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.004
12.
ChliovaM., MairJ., & VernisA. (2020). Persistent category ambiguity: The case of social entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 41(7), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620905168
13.
DacinM. T., DacinP. A., & TraceyP. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
14.
DanaL. P., & DanaT. E. (2005). Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2005.006071
15.
DaviesI. A., HaughH., & ChambersL. (2019). Barriers to social enterprise growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1616–1636.
16.
DohertyB., HaughH., & LyonF. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
17.
DoradoS. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creation, no?. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(04), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946706000453
18.
DiochonM., & GhoreY. (2016). Contextualizing a social enterprise opportunity process in an emerging market. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2015-0032
19.
EmirbayerM., & MischeA. (1998). ‘What is agency?’American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
20.
FriedlandR., & AlfordR. A. (1991). Bridging society back in Symbols as practices and institutional contradictions. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
21.
FritschM. (1997). New firms and regional employment change. Small Business Economics, 9, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007942918390
22.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
23.
HaughH. (2012). The importance of theory in social enterprise research. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211226557
24.
HeT., LiuM. J., PhangC. W., & LuoJ. (2022). Toward social enterprise sustainability: The role of digital hybridity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121360
25.
HotaP. K., MitraS., & QureshiI. (2019). Adopting bricolage to overcome resource constraints: The case of social enterprises in rural India. Management and Organization Review, 15(2), 371–402.
26.
HoveM., NgwerumeE. T., & MuchemwaC. (2013). The urban crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A threat to human security and sustainable development. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(1), 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.ap
27.
JewerJ., PourasgariP., & JugdevK. (2024). Achieving project performance goals in extreme resource-constrained environments: The role of bricolage in social enterprise projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(4/5), 779–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2024-0059
28.
JonesP., MaasG., DobsonS., NewberyR., AgyapongD., & MatlayH. (2018). Entrepreneurship in Africa, part 2: Entrepreneurial education and eco-systems. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(4), 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-08-2018-400
29.
KellyL., PerkingV., ZuraikA., & LuseW. (2022). Social impact: The role of authentic leadership, compassion, and grit in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(2), 298–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557221096876
30.
KickulJ., & LyonsT. S. (2020). Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever-changing world. Routledge.
31.
KulshresthaR., SahayA. & SenguptaS. (2022). Constituents and drivers of mission engagement for social enterprise sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 90–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557211069301
32.
LehnerO. M., & KansikasJ. (2012). Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: A thematic meta-analysis. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135571102100102
33.
LittlewoodD., & HoltD. (2018). Social entrepreneurship and CSR theory: Insights, application and value. In SpenceL. J., FrynasJ. G., MuthuriJ. N. & NavareJ. (Eds.), Research handbook on small business social responsibility (pp. 292–319). Edward Elgar Publishing.
34.
LyonsT. S., HamlinR. E., & HamlinA. (2018). Using entrepreneurship and social innovation to mitigate wealth inequality. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
35.
MadichieN. O., GbadamosiA., & RwelamilaP. (2021). Entrepreneurship and the informal sector: Challenges and opportunities for African business development. Journal of African Business, 22(4), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2021.1893055
36.
MairJ., & MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
37.
MeccheriN., & PelloniG. (2006). Rural entrepreneurs and institutional assistance: An empirical study from mountainous Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620600842113
38.
MNDP. (2017). Seventh national development plan 2017–2021. Government Printers. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/zam170109.pdf
39.
MOF. (2014). Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013–2016. Government Printers.
40.
MswakaW., & AlukoO. (2014). Legal structure and outcomes of social enterprise: The case of South Yorkshire, UK. Local Economy, 29(8), 810–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214558007
41.
MüllerM., Vaseková, V., & KročilO. (2024). Entrepreneurial solutions to social problems: Philosophy versus management as a guiding paradigm for social enterprise success. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2023-0174
42.
NdoricimpaA. (2020). Threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa: A new evidence. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(2), 187–207.
43.
NzikuD. M., & StruthersJ. (2021). Introduction to enterprise and economic development in Africa: The way forward. In Enterprise and economic development in Africa (pp. 3–13). Emerald Publishing Limited.
44.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
45.
QuansahE., HartzD. E., & SalipanteP. (2022). Adaptive practices in SMEs: Leveraging dynamic capabilities for strategic adaptation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(7), 1130–1148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-07-2021-0269
46.
QuinlanC., BabinB., CarrJ., GriffinM., & ZikmundW. G. (2015). Business research methods. Cengage Learning EMEA. https://www.myilibrary.com
47.
RaknerL., & HelleS. E. (2012). The interplay between poverty and electoral authoritarianism: Poverty and political mobilization in Zambia and Uganda [CMI Working Paper No. 2012: 3]. Bergen.
48.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
49.
SarasonY., DeanT., & DillardJ. F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 286–305.
50.
SemegnA. A., & BishnoiN. K. (2021). Analysis of effect of microfinance on the performance of MSEs in Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 30(1), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355720974822
51.
ShawE., & CarterS. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434.
52.
ShortJ. C., MossT. W., & LumpkinG. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 161–194.
53.
SiwaleJ. (2016). Microfinance and loan officers’ work experiences: Perspectives from Zambia. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(9), 1289–1305.
54.
StathopoulouS., PsaltopoulosD., & SkurasD. (2004). Rural entrepreneurship in Europe: A research framework and agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 10(6), 404–425.
55.
SteinerowskiA. A., & Steinerowska-StrebI. (2012). Can social enterprise contribute to creating sustainable rural communities? Using the lens of structuration theory to analyse the emergence of rural social enterprise. Local Economy, 27(2), 167–182.
56.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
57.
TellisW. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3), 1–19. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol3/iss3/1
58.
ThorntonP. H., OcasioW., & LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective; A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press.
59.
TrivediC. (2010). Towards a social ecological framework for social entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 19(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570901900104
60.
UrbanB. (2008). Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Delineating the construct with associated skills. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550810897696
61.
UrbanB. (2020). Entrepreneurial alertness, self-efficacy and social entrepreneurship intentions. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(3), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-08-2019-0285
62.
ValentineG. (2013). Tell me about …: Using interviews as a research methodology. In FlowerdewR. & MartinD. (Eds.), Methods in human geography (pp. 110–127). Routledge.
63.
Van NessR. K., SeifertC. F., MarlerJ. H., WalesW. J., & HughesM. E. (2020). Proactive entrepreneurs: Who are they and how are they different?The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 29(1), 148–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971355719893504
64.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
65.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage Publications.
66.
ZahraS. A., GedajlovicE., NeubaumD. O., & ShulmanJ. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
