Formal and informal networks empower small firms to generate social capital by forging network ties, building on trust and sharing a vision among stakeholders. It enables them to obtain necessary resources, support, information and knowledge, which may be otherwise inaccessible to them. This study analyses the impact of social capital on firm performance through the constructs of network ties, trust and shared vision while drawing a comparison between firms associated with formal and informal networking. An empirical study was conducted via a structured questionnaire on a sample of 100 small firms in West Bengal with 50 firms having membership in industry/trade associations as the experimental group and another 50 firms having only informal connections as the control group. Findings of the multiple regression analysis reveal that the impact of social capital on firm performance is significantly greater in firms engaged in formal and informal networking in contrast to firms embedded only in the informal network.
AdlerP. S., & KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40
2.
AnderssonU., ForsgrenM., & HolmU. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–996.
3.
AntoldiF., CerratoD., & DepperuD. (2011). Export consortia in developing countries: Successful management of co-operation among SMEs. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
BaerM. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592–601.
5.
BennettR. J., & RamsdenM. (2007). The contribution of business associations to SMEs: Strategy, bundling or reassurance?International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 49–69.
6.
ChaminadeC., & VaangJ. (2007). Innovation policies for Asian SMEs: An innovation style perspective. In WaiH. & YeungC. (Eds), Handbook of research on Asian business (pp. 381–408). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
7.
ChungS., SinghH., & LeeK. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 1–22.
8.
DanesM. S., StaffordK., HaynesG., & AmarapurkarS. S. (2009). Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social, and financial capital. Family Business Review, 22(3), 199–215.
9.
De WitB., & MeyerR. (1998). Strategy process, content, context–An international perspective. London: International Thomson Business Press.
10.
DyerJ. H., & ChuW. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68.
11.
FarrellH., & KnightJ. (2003). Trust, institutions, and institutional change: Industrial districts and the social capital hypothesis. Politics and Society, 31(4), 537–566.
12.
FerreiraM. P., LiD., & Ribeiro SerraF. A. (2008). Composition of small and large firms’ business networks in transition economies. Globadvantage Center of Research in International Business & Strategy Working paper No. 22/2008. Retrieved 27February2014, from http://globadvantage.ipleiria.pt/files/2008/06/working_paper-22_globadvantage.pdf
13.
FloraC. B. (1998). Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology, 63(4), 481–506.
14.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
15.
Fuller-LoveN., & ThomasE. (2004). Networks in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 244–253.
16.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
17.
GranovetterM. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.
18.
GranovetterM. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(1), 481–493.
19.
GronumS., VerreynneM.-L., & KastelleT. (2012). The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 257–282.
20.
GulatiR., & GargiuloM. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from?The American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.
21.
InkpenA. (1998). Learning and knowledge acquisitions through international strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4), 69–80.
22.
InkpenA., & TsangE. W. K. (2005). Social capital networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.
23.
JarilloJ. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31–41.
JohnsenR. E., & JohnsenT. E. (1999). International market development through networks: The case of the Ayrshire knitwear sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 5(6), 297–312.
26.
KandemirD., YaprakA., & CavusgilS. T. (2006). Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324–340.
27.
KokaB., & PrescottJ. E. (2002). Strategic alliance as social capital: A multinational view, Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 795–816.
28.
KotabeM., MartinX., & DomotH. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 293–316.
29.
LuoY. (2002). Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 903–919.
30.
McEvilyB., PerroneV., & ZaheerA. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.
31.
McEvilyB., & ZaheerA. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133–1156.
32.
MillerN. J., BesserT., & MalsheA. (2007). Strategic networking among small businesses in small US communities. International Small Business Journal, 25(6), 631–665.
33.
MorrisseyW. J., & PittawayL. (2006). Buyer-supplier relationships in small firms. International Small Business Journal, 24(3), 272–298.
34.
NahapietJ., & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
35.
NeaceM. B. (1999). Entrepreneurs in emerging economies: Creating trust, social capital, and civil society. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, pp. 148–161.
36.
NooteboomB., BergerH., & NoorderhavenN. G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 308–339.
37.
NunnallyJ., & BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
38.
Perry-SmithJ. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101.
39.
PortesA., & SensenbrennerJ. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350.
40.
PremaratneS. P. (2002). Entrepreneurial networks and small business development: The case of small enterprises in Sri Lanka. PhD dissertation, Eindhoven, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Proefschrift. Retrieved 12January2013, from http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200211273.pdf
41.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
42.
SorensonR. L., GoodpasterK. E., HedbergP. R., & YuA. (2009). The family point of view, family social capital, and firm performance: An exploratory test. Family Business Review, 22(3), 239–253.
43.
ThorelliH. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37–51.
44.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
45.
UzziB., & GillespieJ. J. (2002). Knowledge spill over in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7), 595–618.
46.
VanhaverbekeV. (2001). Realizing new regional core competencies: Establishing a customer-oriented SME network. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 13(2), 97−116.
47.
WollebaekD., & SelleP. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity and scope. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 32–61.
48.
WuW.-P. (2008). Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 122–146.
ZhouL., WuW., & LuoX. (2007). Internationalization and the performance of born-global SEMs: The mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 673–690.
