It has generally been argued that women have higher moral standards or display greater concern about the effects of their actions on others when responding to ethical dilemmas. However, the findings of empiricists have hardly been conclusive. We contend that it is important to investigate the ethical attitudes towards business practice of those who are at the early phase of the entrepreneurship path such as enterprise students (n = 128) and nascent entrepreneurs (n = 204). The findings revealed sex differences in the ethical attitudes of enterprise students, but not of nascent entrepreneurs. In addition, the business ethics of male nascent entrepreneurs were significantly higher than those of male enterprise students. We argue that sex-role socialisation reduces differences among individuals performing similar activities, and use moral development theory to explain that ethical values evolve over time.
BamptonR., & MaclaganP. (2009). Does a ‘care orientation’ explain gender differences in ethical decision making? A critical analysis and fresh findings. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(2), 179–191.
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
3.
BanduraA., & JourdenF. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 941–951.
4.
BarnettT., BrownG., & BassK. (1994). The ethical judgements of college students regarding business issues. Journal of Education for Business, 69(6), 333–338.
5.
BeltraminiR. F., PetersonR. A., & KozmetskyG. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(3), 195–200.
6.
BetzM., O’ConnellL., & ShepardJ. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.
7.
BlauF., FerberM. A., & WinklerA. E. (2006). The economics of women, men and work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
8.
BorkowskiS. C., & UgrasY. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.
9.
BriefA., DukerichJ., & DoranL. (1990). Resolving ethical dilemmas in management: Experimental investigation of values, accountability and choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(5), 380–396.
10.
BrushC. G., & EdelmanL. F. (2000). Women entrepreneurs opportunities for database research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 4(1), 445–484.
11.
BucarB., GlasM., & HisrichR. D. (2003). Ethics and entrepreneurs: An international comparative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 261–281.
12.
BurtonR. V., & CaseyW. M. (Eds). (1980). Moral development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Center for Women’s Business Research. (2009). Key facts about women-owned businesses 2008–2009. Washington, DC: Center for Women’s Business Research.
14.
ChaiL. T., LungC. K., & RamlyZ. (2009). Exploring ethical orientation of future business leaders in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 50(2), 109–120.
15.
CohenJ. R., PantL. W., & SharpD. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319–336.
16.
ColeB. C., & SmithD. L. (1996). Perceptions of business ethics: Students vs. business people. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 889–896.
17.
CrosonR., & GneezyU. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
18.
DawsonL. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152.
19.
De ClercqD., & VoronovM. (2011). Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logic. International Small Business Journal, 29(4), 322–344.
20.
EtheredgeJ. M. (1999). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: An alternative scale structure. [Empirical]. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51–64.
21.
EwejeG., & BruntonM. (2010). Ethical perceptions of business students in a New Zealand university: Do gender, age and work experience matter?Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(1), 95–111.
22.
FrankR. H., GilovichT., & ReganD. T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.
23.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practice. [Conceptual]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
24.
GiacaloneR. A., & ThompsonK. R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. [Conceptual]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 266–277.
25.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
GilliganC. (1993). In a a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
GilliganC. (Ed.). (1987). Moral orientation and moral development. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
GloverS. H., BumpusM. A., SharpG. F., & MunchusG. A. (2002). Gender differences in ethical decision making. Women in Management Review, 17(5), 217–227.
29.
HoffmanJ. J. (1998). Are women really more ethical than men? Maybe it depends on the situation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(1), 60–73.
30.
HolmesM. (2007). What is gender?London: Sage.
31.
JaffeeS., & HydeJ. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726.
32.
KickulJ., WilsonF., MarlinoD., & BarbosaS. D. (2008). Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens?Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 321–335.
33.
KuckertzA., & WagnerM. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions: Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 524–539.
34.
LämsäA.M., VehkaperäM., PuttonenT., & PesonenH. L. (2008). Effect of business education on women and men students attitudes on corporate responsibility in society. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 45–58.
35.
LanG., GowingM., McMahonS., RiegerF., & KingN. (2008). A study of the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning of undergraduate business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1), 121–139.
36.
LangenderferH., & RocknessJ. (1989). Integrating ethics into the accounting curriculum: Issues, problems and solutions. Issues in Accounting Education, 4(1), 58–69.
37.
LatifD. A. (2000). Ethical cognition and selection-socialization in retail pharmacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(4), 343–357.
38.
LopezY. P., RechnerP. L., & Olson-BuchananJ. B. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 341–358.
39.
LozaE. (2011). Female entrepreneurship theory: A multidisciplinary review of resources. Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Education, 1(2), 26–64.
40.
MasonE. S., & MudrackP. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: A test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604.
41.
McCabeA. C., IngramR., & Dato-onM. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116.
42.
MitroffI. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.
43.
MujtabaB. G., & SimsR. L. (2006). Socializing retail employees in ethical values: The effectiveness of the formal versus informal methods. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2), 261–272.
44.
NeubaumD. O., PagellM., DrexlerJ. A., Jr., McKee-RyanF. M., & LarsonE. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: An empirical response to critics. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 9–24.
45.
NoeF. P., & SnowR. (1990). The new environmentalism paradigm and further scale analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(4), 20–26.
46.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: MacGraw-Hill Book Company.
47.
O’FallonM. J., & ButterfieldK. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
48.
PeeryW. G. (1968). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
49.
PonemonL. A. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3/4), 239–258.
50.
PoorsoltanK., AminS., & TootoonchiA. (1991). Business ethics: Views of future leaders. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 56(1), 4–10.
51.
ReeseS. (1998). He says it’s okay. American Demographics, 20(6), 36–37.
52.
RestJ. R. (Ed.). (1994). Background: Theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
RobertsA. J. (1996). Green consumer in 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217–231.
54.
RueggerD., & KingE. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.
55.
SerwinekP. (1992). Demographic & related differences in ethical views among small businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 555–566.
56.
SethiS. P., & SamaL. M. (1998). Ethical behavior as a strategic choice by large corporations: The interactive effect of marketplace competition, industry structure and firm resources. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 85–104.
57.
SimsR. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207–211.
58.
SimsR. L. (2000). Teaching business ethics: A case study of an ethics across the curriculum policy. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(4), 437–443.
59.
SimsR. L. (2002). Ethical rule breaking by employees: A test of social bonding theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(2), 101–109.
60.
SinghapakdiA., & MartaJ. K. M. (2005). Comparing marketing students with practitioners on some key variables of ethical decisions. Marketing Education Review, 15(3), 13–25.
61.
SinghapakdiA., VitellS. J., RallapalliK. C., & KraftK. L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. [Empirical]. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1131–1140.
62.
SlaterD. J., & Dixon-FowlerH. R. (2010). The future of the planer in the hands of MBAs: An examination of CEO MBA education and corporate environmental performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 429–441.
63.
SmithP. L., & OakelyE. F., III. (1997). Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students: Implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45.
64.
SpenceL. J., & RutherfoordR. (2001). Social responsibility, profit maximisation and the small firm owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2), 126–139.
65.
StedhamY., YamamuraJ. H., & BeekunR. I. (2007). Gender differences in business ethics: Justice and relativist perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(2), 163–174.
66.
StevensJ. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67.
StimpsonD., JensenL., & NeffW. (1992). Cross-cultural gender differences in preference for a caring morality. Journal of Social Psychology, 132(3), 317–322.
68.
TsalikisJ., & Ortiz-BuonafinaM. (1990). Ethical beliefs’ differences of males and females. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 509–519.
69.
TseA. C. B., & AuA. K. M. (1997). Are New Zealand business students more unethical than non-business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 445–450.
70.
WimalasiriJ. S., PavriF., & JalilA. A. K. (1996). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers in singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1331–1341.
71.
ZalevskiA., & MaruyamaT. (2010). SET Women’s Enterprise in the UK. Retrieved July2011, from http://www.theukrc.org/resources/key-facts-and-figures/set-women-s-enterprise-in-the-uk
