Five Minds for the Entrepreneurial Future

Abstract

This article proposes a new perspective on entrepreneurship curriculum design, one that is founded upon the emerging research into the cognitive skills that successful entrepreneurs possess and deploy. Specifically, this article utilises Gardner’s ‘minds’ approach as a theoretical framework specific to the challenge of developing curriculum for teaching entrepreneurship. Following Gardner, each entrepreneurial mind developed in this article is a meta-category representation of a host of cognitive sub-skills that have been identified through research to be unique to successful entrepreneurs. The five minds for the entrepreneurial future are: (1) The Opportunity Recognising Mind, (2) The Designing Mind, (3) The Risk Managing Mind, (4) The Resilient Mind and (5) The Effectuating Mind. Taken as a whole, these five minds provide an intellectual foundation for entrepreneurship education and curriculum development. The articulation of the aggregated cognitive sub-skills in terms of entrepreneurial minds provides curriculum designers with a handy taxonomy, not unlike those used by general education curriculum designers. In addition, each of the entrepreneurial minds is based on a rich and growing literature that focuses on the cognitive skills that successful entrepreneurs possess.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adcroft, A. , Willis, R. & Dhaliwal, S. (2004). Missing the point? Management education and entrepreneurship . Management Decision, 42, 3/4: 521–30 .

Baron, R.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities . Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 1: 104–19 .

Baron, R.A. & Ensley, M.D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparison of novice and experienced entrepreneurs . Management Science, 52, 9: 1331–44 .

Cuban, L. (2004). Assessing the 20-year impact of multiple intelligences on schooling . Teachers College Record, 106, 1: 140–46 .

Dunne, D. & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion . Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 4: 512–23 .

Ericcson, K.A. , Krampe, R.T. & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance . Psychological Review, 100, 3: 363–406 .

Furnham, A. (2007). Thinking ahead to a global monoculture (Book review) . Management Today, 28 May.

Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press .

Gregorie, D.A. , Noel, M.X. , Dery, R. & Bechard, J. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004 . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30, 3: 333–73 .

10.

Jacoby, R. & Rodriguez, D. (2007). Innovation, growth, and getting to where you want to go . Design Management Review, 18, 1: 10–15 .

11.

Janney, J.J. & Dess, G.G. (2006). The risk concept for entrepreneurs reconsidered: New challenges to the conventional wisdom . Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 3: 385–400 .

12.

Keh, H.T. , Foo, M.D. & Lim, B.C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27, 2: 125–48 .

13.

Kuratko, D.F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, challenges . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29, 5: 577–98 .

14.

Mangurian, G.E. (2007). Realizing what you’re made of . Harvard Business Review, 85, 3: 125–30 .

15.

Mitchell, R.K. , Busenitz, L. , Lant, T. , McDougall, P.P. , Morse E.A. & Smith, B. (2002). Entrepreneurial cognition theory: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27, 2: 93–104 .

16.

Mitchell, R.K. , Busenitz, L.W. , Bird, B. , Gaglio, C.M. , McMullen, J.S. , Morse, E.A. & Smith, J.B. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007 . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31, 1: 1–28 .

17.

Read, S. & Sarasvathy, S.D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise . Journal of Private Equity, 9, 1: 45–62 .

18.

Rossi, J. (2007). Nourishing food for (thought) leaders (Book review) . T + D, 61, 4: 92–93 .

19.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (1998). How do firms come to be? Towards a theory of the prefirm. Doctoral dissertation thesis, Carnegie Mellon University .

20.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency . Academy of Management Review, 26, 2: 243–63 .

21.

Sarasvathy, S.D. (2004). Making it happen: Beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design . Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28, 6: 519–31 .

22.

Schunk, D. (2007). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, Second Edition. New York: Prentice Hall .

23.

Sheffield, R. (2007). Why discipline, synthesis, creativity, respect, and ethics are literally quintessential. (Book review) . People Management, 13, 12: 53 .

24.

Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial, Third Edition. Boston: MIT Press .

25.

Timmons, J.A. (1986). Entrepreneurship and the creation of high-potential ventures. In D.L. Sexton & R.W. Smilor (eds), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (pp. 223–39). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger .

26.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz (ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol. 3 (pp. 119–38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .