Ownership Patterns and Ethical Practices of Small Enterprises in Kolkata

Abstract

The modern business environment is characterised by increased scrutiny of ethical practices. Given the ubiquitous role of small businesses and their expanding realm in the globalised era, it is becoming imperative that these enterprises reckon with the ethical dimension of business on a much more stringent basis. The issues of business ethics, which were primarily addressing problems of large corporations, are gradually encompassing the small enterprises. The objective of this research was to scrutinise the extent to which SMEs conform to ethical norms. With the use of empirical data, we tested whether proprietorship/partnership firms in the Kolkata district of West Bengal are more inclined to indulge in unethical practices in comparison with limited companies. There is clear support for the hypothesis that proprietorship and partnership firms tend to be more ethically infractious than the limited companies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Besser, T.L. & Miller, N. (2001). Is the good corporation dead? The community social responsibility of small business operators . Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 221–41 .

Castka, P. , Balzarova, M.A. , Bamber, C.J. & Sharp, J.M. (2003). How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11: 140–49 .

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. London: Capstone .

Enderle, G. (2004). Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and mediumsized enterprises . Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 1: 51–63 .

Fitchett, J.A. (2005). Consumers as stakeholders: Prospects for democracy in marketing theory . Business Ethics: A European Review, 14, 1: 14–27 .

Hafrey, L. (2007). Small Business Ethics . IPA's Business Today, 2, 1 .

Hannafey, F.T. (2003). Entrepreneurship and ethics: A literature review . Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 2: 99–110 .

Hessen, R. (1979). In Defence of the Corporation. Stanford CA: Hoover Institution Press .

Jenkins, H.M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility—engaging SMEs in the debate . New Academy Review, 3, 3: 76–95 .

10.

Longo, M. , Mura, M. & Bonoli, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: The case of Italian SMEs . Corporate Governance, 5, 4: 28–42 .

11.

Malhotra, N.K. (2007). Marketing Research:An Applied Orientation. New Delhi: Pearson Education Inc .

12.

Morris, M.H. , Schindehutte, M. , Walton, J. & Allen, J. (2002). The ethical context of entrepreneurship: Proposing and testing a developmental framework . Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 4: 331–61 .

13.

Observatory of European SMEs. (2002). European SMEs and Social and Environmental Responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publication of the European Communities .

14.

Payne, S.L. & Duhon, D. (1990). Hard Time Ethics and the Small Business Entrepreneur . Business Insights, 9, 2: 29–32 .

15.

Philips, M. (2001). How to think systematically about Business Ethics? In A.R. Malachowski (ed.), Business Ethics—Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 1 (pp. 21–35). London: Routledge .

16.

Simpson, M. , Taylor, N. & Barker, K. (2004). Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage? Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 3: 156–71 .

17.

Spence, L.J. (1999). Does size matter?: The state of the art in small business ethics . Business Ethics: A European Review, 8, 3: 163–74 .

18.

Thompson, J.K. & Smith, H.L. (1991). Social responsibility and small business: Suggestions for research . Journal of Small Business Management, 29, 1: 30–44 .