Using secondary data from 1990–1991 to 2023–24, this article analyses the effect of geographical indication (GI) registration on basmati rice exports from India. We employed simple linear regression with a dummy variable for the post-GI registration period and interrupted time series models in analysing the effect on trade volume, trade value and unit value of exports. The effect of GI registration on basmati rice export outcomes was significant at the overall level. However, in terms of post-GI registration level and trend change, the effects were not significant. Further, heterogeneity in impact was observed in the analysis at the individual country level. We conclude that, for consolidating GI benefits through exports, protection in importing countries is needed together with quality assurance, and we suggest that a deeper analysis is needed to study market segmentation.
AgostinoM., & TrivieriF. (2014). Geographical indication and wine exports: An empirical investigation considering the major European producers. Food Policy, 46, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.002
2.
AkerlofG. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
3.
BansalM., & SinghR. (2024). Blessing of geography: Impact of geographical indications on agricultural exports in India. IIMB Management Review, 36, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2024.10.003
4.
BaylisK., Jolejole-ForemanM. C. K., & MalloryM. L. (2014). Effects of export restrictions on domestic market efficiency: The case of India’s rice and wheat export ban. CiteseerX. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=289f009e0b539523dd2c37c2c104f6fe49b75d66
5.
BellettiG., BurgassiT., MancoE., MarescottiA., PaccianiA., & ScaramuzziS. (2007, March8–10). The impact of geographical indications (PDO and PGI) on the internationalisation process of agro-food products. Paper presented at the 105th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Bologna, Italy. https://flore.unifi.it/handle/2158/345092
6.
BrooksE. L. (2003). Products and prejudice: Measuring country of origin bias in US wine imports. Santa Cruz Center for International Economics Working Paper, 03–10. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sv3q6qv
7.
ChavanS. D., BansalS., MohapatraS., KaurL., & JadhavA. (2023). Trade directions of Indian basmati rice export—Markov chain approach. Economic Affairs, 68(1), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2023.23
8.
CurziD., & HuysmanM. (2022). The impact of protecting EU geographical indications in trade agreements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(1), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12226
9.
CurziD., & OlperA. (2012). Export behavior of Italian food firms: Does product quality matter?Food Policy, 37(5), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.05.004
10.
De FilippisF., GiuaM., SalvaticiL., & Vaquero-PiñeiroC. (2022). The international competitiveness of geographical indications: Hype or hope?Food Policy, 112, 102371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102371
11.
DeselnicuO. C., CostanigroM., Souza-MonteiroD. M., & McFaddenD. T. (2013). A meta-analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: What drives the premium for origin-based labels?Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 38(2), 204–219. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23496751
12.
Economic Times. (2021, March10). Applications filed in 19 nations for protection of GI, certification mark for basmati. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/applications-filed-in-19-nations-for-protection-of-gi-certification-mark-for-basmati-puri/articleshow/81433839.cms
13.
EllebyC., HansenH., & YuW. (2015, July26–28). Domestic price and welfare effects of the 2007–11 Indian grain export restrictions. Paper presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.205578
14.
EmlingerC., & LatoucheK. (2023, July23–25). Protection of geographical indications in trade agreements: Is it worth it? Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335669/files/26411.pdf
15.
European Commission. (2024). European Commission report of the 6th round of the EU-India negotiations on protection of geographical indications.
16.
FengC. (2024). Feasibility research on mutual recognition of geographical indications for agricultural products between China and Russia. Lex Genetica, 3(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.17803/lexgen-2024-3-1-57-67
17.
FSSAI. (2023, January11). Gazette notification on comprehensive regulatory standards for basmati rice. https://fssai.gov.in/upload/notifications/2023/01/63bff642a2f30Gazette_Notification.pdf
18.
GiraudG. (2008). Range and limit of geographical indication scheme: The case of basmati rice from Punjab, Pakistan. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 11(1), 51–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.53628
19.
GiuaM., SalvaticiL., Vaquero-PiñeiroC., & SolazzoR. (2024). Do territories with geographical indications trade better?Italian Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-024-00269-3
20.
GoI. (2008, March5). Notification No. 82(RE-2007)/2004-2009: Prohibition on export of Basmati and non-basmati rice. DGFT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce. https://taxguru.in/dgft/notification-82-re200720042009-dated-05032008.html
21.
GoI. (2012a, February21). Notification No. 97(RE-2010)/2009–2014: Amendment in Chapter 10 of Schedule 2 of ITC(HS) Classification of Export and Import Items relating to export of Basmati rice. https://content.dgft.gov.in/Website/not9710.pdf
22.
GoI. (2012a, July4). Notification No. 6(RE-2012)/2009–2014: Amendment in export policy for Basmati rice. DGFT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce. https://content.dgft.gov.in/Website/not0612.pdf
23.
GoI. (1996). Economic Survey 1995–96: Chapter 8 – Agriculture. Department of Economic Affairs. https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget_archive/es1995-96/8%20Agriculture.pdf
24.
HaberliC. (2022). IP in EU agriculture: Geographical indications. In ErixonF., GuineaO., LamprechtP., & Van der MarelE. (Eds.), The benefits of intellectual property rights in EU free trade agreements (pp. 185–197). European Centre for International Political Economy. https://ecipe.org/blog/ip-in-eu-agriculture-geographical-indications/
25.
JoshiN., & KumarA. (2023). Basmati rice exports from India: Towards global food security. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(8), 996–1000. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i82037
26.
KuenzelD. J. (2023). Geographical protections and trade: Product-level evidence from EU agreements. https://dkuenzel.faculty.wesleyan.edu/files/2025/03/Kuenzel_EUGPs_Mar2025.pdf
27.
LukoseL. P. (2022). Additional protection for geographical indications in India: A working of section 22(2) of Indian GI Act. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27(September), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v27i5.62742
28.
MaoH., & GorgH. (2024). Don’t take me for a free-ride: Chinese agricultural geographical indications and firms' export quality. Agricultural Economics, 56(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12871
29.
Marie-VivienD. (2008). From plant variety definition to geographical indication protection: A search for the link between basmati rice and India/Pakistan. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 11(4), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2008.00341.x
30.
MelitzM. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
31.
MishraA., & FatesariaH. (2022). Basmati rice: The on-going domestic challenge. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 27(March), 100–106. https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/3294/1/Basmati%20Rice%20%E2%80%93%20The%20On-Going%20Domestic%20Challenge.pdf
32.
MulikK., & CrespiJ. M. (2011). Geographical indications and the trade related intellectual property rights agreement (TRIPS): A case study of basmati rice exports. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 9(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1336
33.
NguyenD. K., NguyenG. T., & YoonH. (2022). The impact of intellectual property rights protection on trade: The role of a “third country” in market power and market expansion effects. Economic Systems, 46(1), 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2022.100942
34.
Press Information Bureau. (2023a, August27). Introduction of additional safeguards for export of Basmati rice to prevent exports of non-Basmati white rice through mis-classification as Basmati rice. Ministry of Commerce & Industry. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1952629
35.
Press Information Bureau. (2023b, July20). Centre amends export policy of non-basmati white rice to ensure adequate domestic availability at reasonable prices. Government of India. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1941139
36.
Press Information Bureau. (2024, September14). Government removes floor price on Basmati rice. Ministry of Commerce & Industry. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2054831
37.
QianW., & DongY. (2023). Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union: From the perspective of the China-EU geographical indications agreement. Agricultural Economics—Czech, 69(5), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.17221/98/2023-AGRICECON
38.
QianW., DongY., & LiuY. (2023). The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 703. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02168-x
39.
RacklJ., & MenapaceL. (2023). The economics of intellectual property protection of geographical indications in international markets. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1724287/1724287.pdf
40.
RaimondiV., FalcoC., CurziD., & OlperA. (2020). Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 330–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12349
41.
SaxenaR., SharmaP., & PantD. K. (2023). Long-term facilitation of agricultural exports. In ICAR-NIAP (Ed.), Agricultural Development Report 2022–23 (pp. 35–43). ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373018424_Long-term_facilitation_of_agricultural_exports
42.
SchamelG. (2007). Auction markets for speciality food products with geographical indications. Agricultural Economics, 37(2–3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00272.x
43.
SidhuJ. S., SinghJ., & KumarR. (2014). Role of market intelligence in agriculture: A success story of basmati cultivation in Punjab. Indian Journal of Economic Development, 10(1a), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2322-0430.10.1a.017
44.
Sliwinska-BartelM., BurnsT. D., & ElliottC. (2021). Rice fraud—a global problem: A review of analytical tools to detect species, countries of origin and adulterations. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 116, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.042
45.
SorghoZ., & LarueB. (2014). Geographical indication regulation and intra-trade in the European Union. Agricultural Economics, 45(51), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12125
46.
SorghoZ., & LarueB. (2018). Do geographical indications really increase trade? A conceptual framework and empirics. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 16(1), 20170010. https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2017-0010
47.
SteeleK. (2022, December29). Basmati rice: The new authenticity rules aiming to remove sub-standard varieties from the market. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/basmati-rice-the-new-authenticity-rules-aiming-to-remove-sub-standard-varieties-from-the-market-196818
48.
TakechiK. (2024). Negative effects of intellectual property protection on entry into foreign markets: Internal versus external supply decisions by large Japanese and US pharmaceutical firms. The International Economy, 27, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.5652/internationaleconomy/ie2024.27.03.kt
49.
Trading Corporation of Pakistan Private Limited v. Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry, CS(COMM) 538/2018 (Delhi High Court, November 28, 2023). https://desikaanoon.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Trading-Corporation-of-Pakistan-Private-Limited-vs-GOI-Ministry-of-Commerce-Industry.pdf
50.
UpretiP. N. (2023). The battle for geographical indication protection of basmati rice: A view from Nepal. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54, 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01323-w
51.
Vaquero-PiñeiroC., & CurziD. (2024). Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(2), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12578
52.
WangM., GeJ., FanX., & HuW. (2025). Price premiums for geographical indication under the coexistence of self-claim and certification. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12612
53.
WilliamsB. (2024, July1). IPONZ rejects Indian Government's trademark for BASMATI. AJ Park. https://www.ajpark.com/insights/iponz-rejects-indian-governments-trade-mark-for-basmati
54.
WIPO. (2021). Geographical indications: An introduction (2nd ed.). https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4562
