Western (or "First World') societies continue to be confronted by the ever growing prob lem of "Third World" poverty. Financial donationsfrom "Western "publics are onepos sible contribution to seeking remedies, but these partly depend on donor experience and perceptions, which are likely to be indirect and subject to attributional biases. Exposing such biases may help to correct them. This paper compares attributions for Third World poverty between Brazilian "actors" living in a developing economy and Australian "ob servers" living in a more industrialised one. One hundred textile workers completed Harper et al.'s Causes of Third World Poverty Questionnaire and Lerner's Just World Scale, with both scales back-translated into Portuguese for the Brazilians. Australians were more likely to stress natural disasters, reflecting the focus of their own media, whereas Brazilians consistently emphasised national corruption. Thesefindings indi cate tbe influence of local perspective, thereby implying that there is scope for donor publics to be sensitised to alternative perceptions of poverty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beaman, A., Barnes, P.J., Klentz, B., & Mcquirk, B. (1978). Increasing helping rates through information dissemination: Teaching pays. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 4, 406-411.
2.
Brislin, R.W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
3.
Carr, S.C. (1996). Social psychology and the management of aid. In S.C. Carr & J.F. Schumaker (Eds), Psychology and the developing world (pp. 103-118). West-port, CT: Praeger.
4.
Carr, S.C., & Maclachlan, M. (1998). Actors, observers, and attributions for "Third World" poverty: Contrasting perspectives from Malawi and Australia. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 189-202.
5.
Carr, S.C., Maclachlan, M., & Campbell, D. (1995). Psychological research for development: Towards tertiary collaboration. In S. Aroni & T. Adams (Eds), Proceedings Vol.1—The fourth international symposium on the role of universities in developing areas (pp. 85-105). Melbourne: UNESCO/INRUDA/IDTC/RMIT .
6.
Carr, S.C., M, E., & Maclachlan, M. (1998). Psychology of aid. London: Routledge.
7.
Commisston Of The European Communties (1977 ). The perception of poverty in Europe. Brussels: EEC.
8.
Dorward. D. (1996). Africa and development in the 21st century. Development Bulletin, 37,4-7.
9.
Feagjn, J.R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101-129.
10.
Feather, N.T. (1974). Explanations of poverty in Australian and American samples: The person, society or fate?Australian Journal of Psychology, 26, 199-216.
11.
Furnham, A. (1982). The perception of poverty among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 5, 135-147.
12.
Gallup, G.H. (1972). The Gallup poll: Public opinion 1935-1971. New York: Random House.
13.
Gergen, K.J. (1994). Toward transformation in social knowledge. London: Sage.
14.
Gertzel, C. (1996, April). Towards a better understanding of the causes of poverty in Africa in the late twentieth century. Briefing Paper No. 42, Australian Development Studies Network, Australian National University, Canberra.
15.
Godwin, N. (1994). A distorted view: Myths and images of developing countries. DevelopmentBulletin, 30, 46-48.
16.
Harper, D.J., Wagstaff, G.F., Newton, J.T., & Harrison, K.R. (1990). Lay causal perceptions of Third World poverty and the just world theory. Social Behavior and Personality, 18,235-238.
17.
Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley , R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
18.
Kealey, D.J. (1996, 3 April). Personal correspondence.
19.
Kelley, J.C. (1989). Australian attitudes to overseas aid: Report from the National Science Survey. International Development Issues , 8, 1-129.
20.
Kleiner, K. (1996, February). West bows to psychology's cultural revolution . New Scientist, 12.
21.
Lamarche, L., & Tougas, F. (1979). Perception des raisons de la pauvreté par des Montréalais Canadiens-Français. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 11, 72-78.
22.
Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion . New York: Plenum Press.
23.
Lopez, S.A. (1987). Sources of chronic rural poverty: Behavioral perspectives . Revista Interamericana de Psichologia, 21, 72-89.
24.
Mehryar, A.H. (1984). The role of psychology in national development: Wishful thinking and reality. International Journal of Psychology , 19, 159-167.
25.
Moghaddam, F.M., & Taylor, D.M. (1986). What constitutes an appropriate psychology for the developing world?International Journal of Psychology , 21, 253-267.
26.
Monson, T.C., & Snyder, M. (1977). Actors, observers, and the attribution process: Towards a reconceptualization. Jonrnal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 13, 89-111.
27.
Montero, M. (1990). Ideology and psychosocial research in Third World contexts. Journal of Social Issues.46, 43-55.
28.
Pandey, J., Sinha, Y., Prakash, A., & Tripathi, R.C. (1982). Right-left political ideologies and attribution of the causes of poverty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 327-331.
29.
Payne, M., & Furnham, A. (1985). Explaining the causes of poverty in the West Indies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Economic Psychology , 6, 215-229.
30.
Perry, D.K., & Mcnelly, J.T. (1988). News orientations and variability of attitudes towards developing countries. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32, 323-334.
31.
Reser, J.P. (1991). Aboriginal mental health: Conflicting cultural perspectives. In J. Reid & P. Trompf (Eds), The health of aboriginal Australia (pp. 218-291). Marrickville: Harcouct Brace Jovanovich.
32.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174-221.
33.
Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York : Vintage.
34.
Singh, S., & Vasudeva, P. (1977). A factorial study of the perceived reasons for poverty. Asian Journal of Psychology andEducation, 2, 51-56.
35.
Sinha, D. (1990). Interventions for development out of poverty. In R.W. Bristin (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 77-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Skitka, L.J., McMurray, P.J., & Burroughs, T.E. (1991). Willingness to provide post-war aid to Iraq and Kuwait: An application of the contingency model of distributive justice. ContemporarySocial Psychology, 15, 179-188.
37.
Smith, P.B., & Bond, M.H. (1993) Social psychology across cultures. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
38.
Storms, M.D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175.
39.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1959). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
40.
Tamayo, A. (1994). Factorial scale for causal attributions of poverty . Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa, 10, 21-29.
41.
Todaro, M. (1994). Economic development. London . Longman.
42.
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources and standards of living. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
World Bank (1995). World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
45.
Zucker, G., & Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 234, 925-943.
