The paper aims to present a theoretical model of projective-inventory (P-I) method of personality assessment and provide empirical findings in the area. This method integrates the positive psychometric aspects of both projective and self-report inventories to achieve scoring objectivity and greater reliability and validity of trait scales (Puhan, 1982). Accordingly, real-life episodes are presented to the subjects as structured projective stimulus situations with three or four interacting characters who may be placed at differentpoints on the trait continuum . Each episode is followed by a number of statements relating to the activities of the characters which are "Agreed" or "Disagreed" by the subjects to ensure objectivity in scoring. The P-I method is satisfactorily evaluated against the requirements of convergent and discriminant validity and has been used to develop a nu mber of personality scales. The paper also presents data of several empirical studies indicating minimal influence of social desirability on projective-inventory scores. The P-I method is described as a trait-in-state approach to personality assessment as it samples situations from a wide range of possibilities and accommodates the trait-state controversies in the area. Besides, it is argued that the utilisation of real-life episodes in the P-I method brings the context back to the testing situation through its narratives to which Indians are quite accustomed. Considering its origin from an Indian anecdote and su itabilityfor India npop ulatio n where social desirabilityposes fargreater challenges for inventory scores, the P-I is described as an indigenous method of personality assessment. Thepaper also calls for the development of scales to measure different contemporary Indian traits utilising the P-I method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adair, J.G. (1989). Development of the discipline and its contribution to social development in developing countries. Invited address to the Inter-American Congress of Psychology, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2.
Adair, J.G., Puhan, B.N., & Vohra, N. (1993). Indigenization of psychology: Empirical assessment of progress in Indian research. International Journal of Psychology , 28, 149-69.
3.
Agarwal, K.G. (1975). Psychology or adaptology. Social Scientist, 1-5.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Psychological Association .
6.
Azuma, H. (1984). Psychology in a non-westem country. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 45-56.
7.
Banu, S. (1982). Further investigation into the projective-inventory method to measurement of personality traits. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar .
8.
Bem, D.J. (1983). Further deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency: A reply to Mischel and Peake. Psychological Review , 90, 390-93.
9.
Berry, J.W. (1980). Introduction to methodology. In H.C. Triandis & J.W.Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology , Vol.2 (pp.1-28). Boston. MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Books.
11.
—. ( 1977). Advancing the psychology of personality: Paradigmatic shift or improving the quality of research. In D.Magnusson & N.S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 37-64). New York: Wiley .
12.
—. (1990). More remarks on social desirability. American Psychologist, 45, 1076-77.
13.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 82-105.
14.
Costa, P.T., Jr., McCRAE, R.R., & Arenberg, D. (1980). Enduring dispositions in adult males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 38, 793-800.
15.
Crino, M.D., Svoboda, M., Rubenfeld, S., & White, M.C. (1983). Data on the Marlowe-Crowne and Edwards social desirability scales. Psychological Reports, 53, 963-68.
16.
Das, Jeesur. (1979). Effect of nature of statements on the item-validity of projective-inventory. Unpublished master's thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar.
17.
Das, M. ( 1982). Development of a test of jealously through projective-inventory method. Unpublished master's thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar.
18.
Davis, C., & Cowles, M. (1989). Automated psychological testing: Method of administration, need for approval, and measures of anxiety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49 (2), 311-20.
19.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1984). Transference of psychological knowledge and its impact on Mexico. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 123-34.
20.
Edwards, A.L. (1970). The measurement of personality traits by scales and inventories. New York: Holt .
21.
Edwards, L.K., & Clark, C.L. (1987). Social desirability values and dispersions for the items in two SD scales: The MMPI SD scale and an experimental SD scale . Psychological Reports, 60, 1083-86.
22.
Edwards, L.K., Edwards, A.L., & Clark, C.L. (1988). Social desirability and the frequency of social-reinforcement scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 526-29.
23.
Elder, R., & Johnson, D.C. (1989). Varying relationship between adaptation-innovation and social desirability, Psychological Reports, 65, 1151-54.
24.
Endler, N.S. (1983). Interactionism: A personality model but not yet a theory. In M.M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Personality-Current Theory and Research (pp. 155-200). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
25.
Endler, N.S., & Edwards, J.M. (1985). Evaluation of the state-trait anxiety concept within an interaction model. The Southern Psychologist, 2, 63-71.
26.
Endler, N.S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality . Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956-74.
27.
Endler, N.S., Parker, J.D.A., Bagby, R.M., & Cox, B.J. (1991). Multidimensionality of state and trait anxiety: Factor structure of the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 919-26.
28.
Enriquez, V.G. (1979). Towards cross-cultural knowledge through cross-indigenous methods and perspectives. Philippine Journal of Psychology , 12, 9-16.
29.
—. ( 1989). Indigenous psychology and national consciousness. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
30.
Epstein, S. (1983). Stability of confusion: A reply to Mischel and Peake. Psychological Review, 90, 179-84.
31.
Funder, D.C. (1982). On the accuracy of dispositional vs. situational attributions. Social Cognition, 1, 205-22.
32.
Furnham, A. (1986). The social desirability of the Type A behavior pattern. Psychological Medicine, 16, 805-11.
33.
Hartshorne, H., & May, M.A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character (Vol.1)New York: Macmillan.
34.
Helmes, E., & Holden, R.R. (1986). Response styles and faking on the Basic Personality Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 853-59.
35.
Holden, R.R., & Fekken, G.C. (1989). Three common social desirability scales: Friends, Acquaintances, or Strangers? Journal of Research in Personality , 23, 180-91.
36.
Holden, R.R., & Mendonca, J.D. (1984). Helplessness, social desirability, and suicidal behavior: A need for conceptual and empirical disentanglement . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1342-45.
37.
Jackson, D.N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests. Psychological Review, 78, 229-48.
38.
—. (1984). Personality Research Form manual(3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
39.
Jackson, D.N., & Paunonen, S.V. (1985). Construct validity and the predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 554-70.
40.
Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols.1 & 2)New York: Norton.
41.
Kim, U. ( 1986, June). Logical necessity of indigenous psychologies: A critical analysis of social psychology as an experimental science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
42.
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children's orientations toward a moral order. Vita Humana, 6, 11-33.
43.
—. (1964). The development of moral character and moral ideology . In M.N. Hoffman & L.W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol.1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44.
—. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNalley.
45.
Lagmay, A.V. (1984). Western psychology in the Philippines: Impact and response. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 31-44.
46.
Lobel, S.A. (1988). Effects of personal versus impersonal rater instructions on relative favourabiliry of thirteen ethnic group stereotypes. Journal of Social Psychology, 128 (1), 29-39.
47.
McCrae R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 51, 882-88.
48.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
49.
—. (1973). Towards a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 253-83.
50.
—. (1979). On the interface of cognition and personality: Beyond the person-situation debate. American Psychologist , 34, 740-54.
51.
Mischel, W., & Peake, P.K. (1983). Some facets of consistency: Replies to Epstein , Funder, and Bem. Psychological Review, 90, 394-402.
52.
Mishra, S. (1993). On development of Ingratiation Projective-Inventory . Unpublished master's thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar.
53.
Misra, A. (1982). Item analysis of a test of tolerance through projective-inventory method. Unpublished M.Phil. dissertation, Utkal University , Bhubaneshwar.
54.
Moghaddam, A. (1987). Psychology in three worlds: As reflected by the crisis in social psychology and the move toward indigenous third-world psychology . American Psychologist, 42, 912-20.
55.
Moghaddam, F.M., & Taylor, D.M. (1986). What constitutes an 'appropriate psychology' for the developing world. International Journal of Psychology , 21, 253-67.
56.
Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nederhof, A.J. (1985). Method of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-80.
59.
Nevid, J.S. (1983). Hopelessness, social desirability, and construct validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 139-40.
60.
Nunnally, J.C., JR. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement . New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
O'Grady, K.E. (1988). The Marlowe-Crowne and Edwards social desirability scales: A psychometric perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 87-101.
62.
Pandey, A.K. (1983). Development of a test of adjustment by projective-inventory method. Unpublished M.Phil.dissertation, Utkal University , Bhubaneshwar.
63.
—. (1987). Contribution of social desirability factor to adjustment projective-inventory scores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar.
64.
Pandey, J. (1981a). Ingratiation as a social behavior. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Perspectives on experimental social psychology in India. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Co.
65.
—. (1981b). Ingratiation tactics in India. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 147-48.
66.
—. (1981c). A note on social power through ingratiation among workers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 65-67.
67.
Pandey, J., & Kakkar, S. (1982). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in ingratiation tactics and social influence and control mechanism. In R. Rath, H.S. Asthana, D. Sinha, &J.B.P. Sinha (Eds.), Diversityand unity in cross-cultural psychology . Holland: Swets & Zeitlinger, B.V.
68.
Parida, S.K. (1989). Employees' learned helplessness in organisation: Projective-Inventory approach of assessment and prediction. Unpublished master's thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar .
69.
Patnaik, G. (1988). Contribution of social desirability to projective-inventory test scores. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utkal University , Bhubaneshwar.
70.
Patnaik, G., & Puhan, B.N. (1994). Manualforfemininity, dominance and sociability projective-inventories. Agra: National Psychological Corporation.
71.
Patnaik, S., & Puhan, B.N. (1988). Immunity of projective-inventories to social desirability . Psychological Studies, 33, 132-36.
72.
Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two component models of socially desirable responding . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
73.
Piaget, J. (1974). Need and significance of cross-cultural studies in genetic psychology. In J.W. Berry & P.R. Dasen (Eds.), Culture and Cognition. London: Methuene .
74.
Puhan, B.N. (1982). Issues in psychological measurement. Agra: National Psychological Corporation.
75.
Puhan, B.N., & Rath, P.K. (1981). Projective-inventory: A new approach to personality assessment. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education, 7, 16-24.
76.
Puhan, B.N., & Sahoo, F.M. (1991). Indigenization of psychological studies: Research agenda. Indian Journal of CurrentPsychological Research, 6 (2), 101-7.
77.
Ramanujan, A.K. (1990). Is there an Indian way of thinking? In M. Marriott (Ed.), India through Hindu categories . New Delhi: Sage.
78.
Rath, P.K. (1986). A theoretical analysis and empirical investigation oftheprojectiveinventory approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter.
79.
Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on perception (4th ed.). New York : Grune & Stratton.
80.
Sahoo, B. (1980). Effect of contextual relation and nature of item on item-validity in projective-inventory. Unpublished master's thesis, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar.
81.
Samal, J. (1982). Development of a test of self-control by projective-inventory method. Unpublished M.Phil.dissertation, Utkal University , Bhubaneshwar.
82.
Schwendler, W. (1984). UNESCO's project on the exchange of knowledge for endogenous development. International Journal of Psychology , 19, 3-15.
83.
Sechrest, L. (1968). Testing, measuring, and assessing people. In E.F. Borgatta & W.W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook ofpersonality theory and research . Chicago: Rand McNally.
84.
Serpell, R. (1984). Commentary: The impact of psychology on third world development. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 179-92.
85.
Sinha, D. (1984). Psychology in the context of third world development . International Journal of Psychology, 19, 22-27.
86.
—. (1986). Psychology in a third world country: The Indian experience. New Delhi: Sage Publications .
87.
—. (1988). Indigenization of psychology in India and its relevance. Indian Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 77-91.
88.
—. (1994). Indigenization of psychology in India. Indian Psychological Abstracts and Reviews, 1(1).
89.
Sinha, J.B.P. (1984). Towards partnership for relevant research in the third world. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 169-78.
90.
Smedslund, J. (1984). The invisible obvious: Culture in psychology. In K.M.J. Lagerspetz & P. Niemi (Eds.), Psychology in the 1990s. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
91.
Tripathi, R.R., & Shahiahan, M. (1987). Constancy of social desirability judgements across India, Bangladeshi and American samples. Psychological Studies , 32(1), 3-35.
92.
Walsh, J.A. (1990). Comments on social desirability. American Psychologist, 45 (2), 289-90.
