Critical Factors of Work-Family Linkage: An Application of Lens Model to Generate Indigenous Dimensions

Abstract

The present study used the lens model to generate idiographic data in the context of individual judgement of work-family conflict/harmony. This model takes an individual's differential dependence on various cues in a social judgement situation into account. Thirty females and 30 males participated in the two sessions of the study. Each participant was presented with 25 profiles. Each profile contained bar diagrams depicting differential magnitudes of harmony factors. The magnitude of each factor was systematically varied across profiles. Each participant was asked to examine a profile and indicate the extent of harmony experienced on a 20-point scale. This procedure was repeated for conflict factors. Child-related support emerged as the most significantfactor. Emotional supportfrom spouse and clarity ofdivision of duties were moderately significant. Temperamental differences betweenpartners was a significant conflict-inducing criterion. Family demands and work obligations were significant for females only. Apart from generating relevant dimensions for the study of work- family linkages, the study also offered a possible framework of deriving indigenous parameters with the help of the lens model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amaro, H. , Russo, N.F. , & Johnson, J. (1987). Family and work predictors of psychological well-being among Hispanic women professionals, Psychology of Women Quarterly , 11, 505-21.

Anderson, E.A. & Leslie, L.A. (1991). Coping with employment and family stress: Employment arrangement and gender differences, Sex Roles, 24(3-4), 223-37.

Baruch, G.K. , Biener, L. , & Barnett, R.C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress, American Psychologist, 42, 130-36.

Browne, B.A. & Gillis, J.S. (1982). Evaluating the quality of instruction in art: A social judgement analysis, Psychological Reports, 50, 955-62.

Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Costin, S.E. & Jones, D.C. (1992). Friendship as a facilitator of emotional responsiveness and prosocial interventions among children, Developmental Psychology. 28, 941-47.

Dancer, L.S. & Gilbert. L.A. (1993). Spouse's family work participation and its relation to wives' occupational level, Sex Roles, 28, 127-45.

Duxbury, L.E. & Higgins, C.A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60-74.

Gillis, J.S. (1980). Understanding the effects of psychiatric drugs on social judgement. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 3, 25-36.

10.

Handy, C. (1986). The family: Help or hindrance. In C.L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work. Avon: The Bath Press.

11.

Hursch, C.J. , Hammond, K.R. , & Hursch, J.L. (1964). Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies, Psychological Review, 71, 42-60.

12.

Kanungo, R.N. (1982). Work alienation. New York: Praeger.

13.

Kapur, P. (1972). Marriageand the working women in India. Delhi: Vikas Publications.

14.

Lein, L. (1979). Working couples as parents. In Eunice Corfman (Ed.), Families today, vol. 1: A research sampler on fam ilies and children. Maryland : NIMH, Division of Scientific and Public Information .

15.

Lewis, S.N. & Cooper, C.L. (1988). Stress in dual-earner families. In B.A. Gutek , A.H. Stromberg , & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women and work (vol. 3). London : Sage Publications.

16.

Mathur, D. (1992). Women, family and work. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

17.

Mumpower, J. & Adelman, L. (1980). The application of Brunswikian methodology to policy formation. In K.R. Hammond & N.E. Wascoe (Eds.), New directions for methodologyofsocial and behaviouralsciences, no. 3: Realisation of Brunswikian representative design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

18.

Nieva, V.F. (1985). Work and family linkages. In L. Larwood , A.H. Stromberg & B.A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and world: An annual review, (vol. 1). London: Sage Publications.

19.

Olicker, S.J. (1989), Best friends and marriage: Exchange among women . Berkeley: University of California Press.

20.

Pleck, J.H. (1985). Working wives/working husbands. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

21.

Rani, V. & Khandelwal, P. (1992). Family environment and interpersonal behaviour: A comparative study of dual-career and single-career family, International Journal of Social Work, 53, 232-43.

22.

Robinson, J.P. (1989). Work, free time and quality of life. In M.D. Lee & R.N. Kanungo (Eds.), Work and management of personal life: Problems and opportunities. New York: Praeger .

23.

Rout, U. & Rout, J.K. (1993). Stress and general practitioners. London: Kluwer Academic Publications.

24.

Sahoo, F.M. & Bidyadhar, S. (1992). The subjective components of psychological well-being: An idiographic investigation using the lens model, Psychological Studies, 37, 151-60.

25.

Saraswathi, T.S. & Kaur, B. (1993). Human development andfamily studies in India: An agenda for research and policy. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

26.

Scarr, S. , Phillips, D. , & McCarthy, K. (1990). Working mothers and their families, Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development, 261-78.

27.

Shaffer, G.S. (1978). Patterns of work and non-work satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 115-24.

28.

Shipley, P. & Coats, M. (1992). A community study of dual-role stress and coping in working mothers, Work and Stress, 6, 49-63.

29.

Steffy, B.D. & Ashbaugh, D. (1986). Dual career planning, marital satisfaction and job stress among women in dual career marriages, Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 114-23.

30.

Wadhera, K. (1976). The new bread-winners. New Delhi: Vishwa Yuvak Kendra.

31.

Wiersma, U.J. & Vanderberg, P. (1991). Work-home role conflict, family climate and domestic responsibilities among men and women in dual-earner families, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1207-17.

32.

Zedeck, S. (1992). Work, family and organisations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

33.

Zedeck, S. & Mosier, K.L. (1990). Work in the family and employing organisations , American Psychologist, 45 (2), 240-51.