Regional Similarities and Differences in People's Beliefs,Practices and Preferences

Abstract

Seven hundred fifty-three students from seven cities of India reported: (a) their perception of what people in general believe, practise and prefer (i.e., operative values); (b) their own allocentric and idiocentric orientations; (c) the extent to which they attached importance to other's (over their own) opinions, desires and interests; and (d) their age, gender, caste, class and urban exposure.

The significant mean differences between the seven sub-samples led to identify three clusters of cities, namely the North, the South and the Central. The North and the South presented a contrast—the former manifesting strong orientations to meet unjustifiable and inconvenient social obligations and to cultivate personalised relationships. The Central cluster showed a differentpattern. The items on which the sub-samples did not differ formed a general factor of collectivism consisting of the themes of familialism, hierarchy and relationship orientation. Collectivism was found to be unrelated to the respondents' rating of the importance attached to other's (over one's own) opinions, desires and interests. Femalestudents, and those who were low on caste, class and urban exposure attached greater importance to others' than to one's own desires, opinions and interests. The self-ratings of allocentrism and idiocentrism proved to be unreliable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Daab, W.L. (1991). Changing perspectives on individualism. Paper presented at the Helsinki meeting of the International Society of Politicai Psychology, July.

England, G.W. (1974). Personal value system and expected behaviour of managers. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference of Applied Psychology, Montreal, Canada.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lykes, M.B. (1985). Gender and individualistic and collectivistic notions of self. In A. Stewart & B. Lykes (Eds.), Gender and personality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press..

Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York : McGraw Hill.

Nehru, J. (1946). The discovery of India. Calcutta : Signet Press.

Schwartz, S.H. & Bilsky, W. (1987). Towards a universal structure of human values . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-62.

Sears, D.O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature, Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51, 515-30.

Sinha, J.B.P. (1990). The salient Indian values and their socio-ecological roots, Indian Journal of Social Science, 3, 478-88.

10.

Sinha, J.B.P. & Verma, Jyoti (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.) Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zetlinger. Triandis , H.C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.

11.

—. (1994). Culture and social behaviour. New York: McGraw Hill.

12.

Tripathi, R.C. (1988). Aligning development to values in India. In D. Sinha & Henry S.R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development (pp. 315-33). New Delhi: Sage.

13.

Wiener, B.J. (1962). Satistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw Hill.