Berry's model of acculturation can be considered as very useful to classify different strategies to cope with or to adjust to a new culture. In the model four relevant modes of acculturation are described: integration, assimilation, segregation and marginalisation. Research illustrates that these modes are differently related to health and psychosocial adjustment. Irrespective of the mode mostly preferred by a social group, we find marked inter-individual differences in the preference of an acculturation style Research findings show that these individual differences are very closely related to a series of personality variables, such as cognitive styles, coping styles, and reactions to stressful life events in general. Understanding the complex relationships between personality and acculturation modes can help the social scientist to develop and apply adequate intervention strategies and to give some suggestions for the development of adequate socio-political acculturation programmes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berry, J.W. (1988). Acculturation and psychological adaption: Conceptual overview. In J.W. Berry & R.C.Annis (Eds.), Ethnic psychology: Research and practice with immigrants, refugees, native peoples, ethnic groups and sojourners. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
2.
Berry, J.W., Kalin, R., & Taylor, D.M. (1977). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
3.
Berry, J.W., Kim, U., & Boski, P. (1986). Acculturation and psychological adaptation. In Y. Y. Kim & W.B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Current studies in cross-cultural adaptation (Vol. II of Intercultural Communications Annual). London: Sage Publications.
4.
Endler, N.S., & Parker, J.D. (1990). The multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
5.
Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, M.W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
6.
Grossarth-Maticek, R., & Eysenck, H.J. (1990). Personality, stress, and disease: Description and validity of a new inventory. Psychological Reports, 66, 355-373.
7.
Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H.J., & Vetter, H. (1988). Personality type, smoking habit and their interaction as predictors of cancer and coronary heart disease. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 479-495.
8.
Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw Hill.
9.
Lazarus, R.S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L.A. Pervin & M. Lewis (Eds.), Perspectives on interactional psychology. New York: Plenum.
10.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations in the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York : Basic Books.
11.
Rusalov, V.M. (1989). Object-related and communicative aspects of human temperament: A new questionnaire of the structure of temperament. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 817-827.
12.
Schmitz, P.G. (1982). Eine Skala zur Messung der offenheit-Geschlossenheit des Kognitiven Systems—Die D-Skala von M. Rokeach. Berichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut, 8 (1). Bonn: Psychologisches Institut .
13.
Schmitz, P.G. (1985). Sociocultural and personality differences in the dimension of the open and closed mind. In G. Unks (Ed.), Authoritarianism and dogmatism (Part 2, pp. 348-364). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press .
14.
Schmitz, P.G. (1987). Acculturation attitudes and beliefs of immigrants . Paper presented at the First Regional North American Conference of the IACCP, Kingston, Canada.
15.
Schmitz, P.G. (1988 a). Personality, temperament, and social behaviour . Paper presented at the Fourth European Conference on Personality, Stockholm, Sweden.
16.
Schmitz, P.G. (1988 b). Reciprocal acculturation: Mutual influences . Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress of the IACCP, Newcastle, Australia.
17.
Schmitz, P.G.( 1988 c). Personality and individualistic strategies of acculturation . Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress of the IACCP, Newcastle, Australia.
18.
Schmitz, P.G. (1989, 23-26 November). Personality and acculturation (Personalidade e Aculturacao). Paper presented at the 2a. Convencao do Psicologos Portugueses, Conferencia International "A Psicoloe os Psicologos Hoje". Lisbon, Portugal.
19.
Schmitz, P.G. (1990a, 16-20 July). Acculturation styles and health. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress of Cross Cultural Psychology, Nara, Japan.
20.
Schmitz, P.G. (1990 b). Individualism-collectivism and acculturation modes. Paper presented at the Korean Psychological Association Conference "Individualism and Collectivism: Psychological Perspectives from East and West", Seoul, Korea.
21.
Schmitz, P.G. (1991 a, 4-6 July). Basic personality dimensions. Paper presented at the symposium on Personality Research in East and West at the IACCP Debrecen ConferenceDebrecen, Hungary.
22.
Schmitz, P.G. (1991 b, 20-21 November). Basis Dimensionen der Personlickeit . Paper presented at the "1. Arbeitstagung fur Differentielle Psychologie and Personalichkeitsfurschung", Heidelberg.
23.
Schmitz, P.G. (1992 a). Personality, stress-reactions and diseases. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 683-691.
24.
Schmitz, P.G. (1992 b). Personality, stress-reactions and psychosomatic complaints. In G.Van Heck, P.Bonaiuto, & I.Deary (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol.4). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
25.
Thomae, H. (1988). Das Individuuum and seine Welt. Eine Personlichkeitstheorie (2nd edition). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
26.
Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., VILIAREAE, M.J, Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self—group relationship . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
27.
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D.M., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three) robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929-941.
