Contrary to the passivity embedded in the term ‘victim’, collective victimhood experienced by the Dalits is highly active and agentic. Dalits negotiate the meaning of collective victimhood in various creative expressions where they project their lived experiences of ‘being’ and reify them at the collective level thus generating a radical shift in the very meaning of their state of being the victims by communicating a sense of resistance. This transition in the meaning of ‘being’ is facilitated by the process of ‘becoming’, which is explained here as social repositioning of the identity that involves recognising, deconstructing and reinterpreting the sense of imposed victimhood. Recognition of anguish and its projection in the form of collective resistance reconstructs Dalits’ victimhood and transforms their everyday experiences of being suppressed and oppressed into a form of political assertion. This article presents negotiations of meaning of Dalit (collective) victimhood, its reification through the varied creative expressions and the role of symbolic resources in birthing stability to the basic construct. It also discusses how the reified victimhood of Dalits acts as a ‘vehicle of emancipation’ for their harried members and as a tool to generate a collective identity that’s agentic, forceful and transformative.
ArchnaSinghP. (2018). Changing lives of Dalits, the Musahar’s community in Madhepura, Bihar: Socio-economic observation in twenty-first century. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 10(2), 1–12.
Bar-TalD.Chernyak-ChaiL.SchoriN.GundarA. (2009). A sense of self perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91, 229–258.
4.
BrueckL. R. (2014). Writing resistance: The rhetorical imagination of Hindi Dalit literature. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
DubeS. (2012). A Dalit iconography of an expressionist imagination. In TartakovG. M. (Ed.), Dalit art and visual imagery (pp. 251–267). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7.
GeethaV. (2009). Bereft of being: The humiliation of untouchability. In GuruG. (Ed.), Humiliation: Claims and context (pp. 95–107). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
8.
GreenE. G. T.VisintinE. P.HristovaA.BozhanovaA.PereiraA.StaerkleC. (2017). Collective victimhood and acknowledgement of outgroup suffering across history: Majority and minority perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 228–240.
9.
GuissmeL. D.LicataL. (2017). Competition over collective victimhood recognition: When perceived lack of recognition for past victimization is associated with negative attitudes towards another victimized group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 148–166.
10.
GuruG. (1995). Dalit women talk differently. The Economic & Political Weekly, 30(41/42), pp. 2548–2550
11.
GuruG. (2009). Rejection of rejection: Foregrounding self respect. In GuruG. (Ed.), Humiliation: Claims and context (pp. 209–225). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
12.
HardtmannE.-M. (2009). The Dalit movement in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
13.
JadhavR. C. (2009). Dalit feelings and aesthetic detachment. In DangleA. (Ed.), Poisoned bread (pp. 304–311). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.
14.
KumarA. (2006, October7–13). Culture, development and cultural capital of farce: The Musahar community of Bihar. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(40), 4282–4291.
15.
KumarRavi. (2006). Educational deprivation of the marginalized: A village study of the Musahar community in Bihar. In KumarR. (Ed.), Crisis of elementary education in India (pp. 301–341). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
16.
KumarRaj. (2007). Dalit literature: A perspective from below. In AhmedI.UpadhyayS. B. (Eds.), Dalit assertion in society, literature and history (pp. 121–136). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.
17.
LimbaleS. K. (2004). Towards an aesthetic of Dalit literature: History, controversies and considerations (MukherjeeA., Trans.). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.
18.
LimbaleS. K. (2008). The outcaste Akkarmashi (BhoomkarS., Trans.). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
LynchO. M. (2012). We make floats so that they will see what we see/feel: Ambedkar Jayanti, hierarchy, and the Darsan effect. In TartakovG. M. (Ed.), Dalit art and visual imagery (pp. 189–218). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
20.
McNeillA.PehrsonS.StevensonC. (2017). The rhetorical complexity of competitive and common victimhood in conversational discourse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 167–179.
21.
MuktibodhS. (2009). What is Dalit literature? In DangleA. (Ed.), Poisoned bread (pp. 270–273). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Private Limited.
22.
MukulS. (1999). The untouchable present: Everyday life of Musahars in North Bihar. Economic & Political Weekly, 34(49), 3465–3470.
23.
NandyA. (2009). Humiliation: Political and the cultural psychological limits of human degradation. In GuruG. (Ed.), Humiliation: Claims and context (pp. 41–57). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
24.
PatilS. (2007). Transcending orbits of Dalit women’s minor literature. In AhmedI.UpadhyayS. B. (Eds.), Dalit assertion in society, literature and history (pp. 142–155). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan Publications.
25.
PenicS.ElcherothG.MorselliD. (2017). Inter-group forgiveness in the aftermath of symmetric and asymmetric communal violence: Contact density and nationalistic climates as contextual mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 209–227.
26.
RegeS. (1998). Dalit women talk differently: A critique of ‘difference’ and towards a Dalit feminist standpoint position. The Economic &Political Weekly, 33(44), WS39–WS46.
27.
RonsboH.JensenS. (2014). Histories of victimhood: Assemblages, transactions, and figures. In JensenS.RonsboH. (Eds.), Histories of victimhood (pp. 1–22). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schori-EyalN.HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: Effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli-Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(12), 778–794.
30.
Schori-EyalN.KlarY.Ben-AmiY. (2017). Perpetual in group victimhood as a distorted lens: Effects on attribution and categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 180–194.
31.
SinghD. P. (2016). Socio-demographic condition of one of the most marginalised caste in Northern India. Demography India, 45(1–2), 117–130.
32.
SinghA.KumarK.SinghA. (2015). Exclusion within excluded: The economic divide between scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. Economic & Political Weekly, 50(42), 32–42.
33.
SzantonD. L. (2012). Mithila painting: The Dalit intervention. In TartakovG. M. (Ed.), Dalit art and visual imagery (pp. 219–234). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
34.
TartakovG. M. (2012). The Navyana Buddhists on public stage. In TartakovG. M. (Ed.), Dalit art and visual imagery (pp. 157–178). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
35.
ThoratS. (2012). Foreward. In TartakovG. M. (Ed.) Dalit art and visual imagery (pp. xv–xxiv). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
36.
ValmikiO. P. (2014). Joothan (MukherjiA. P., Trans.). Kolkata: Samya Publications.
37.
VyasA. (2015). Caste, experience and creativity: A cultural-psychological analysis of the life and literature of Om Prakash Valmiki (Unpublished MPhil dissertation). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
38.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ZelliotE. (2001). From untouchable to Dalit. Delhi: Manohar Publication.
40.
ZittounT. (2007a). The role of symbolic resources in human lives. In ValsinerJ.RosaA. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 343–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
ZittounT. (2007b). Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions. Young, 15(2), 193–211.
42.
ZittounT. (2008). Learning through transitions: The role of institutions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 165–181.
