Migration entails complex transformations in family functioning and dynamics, especially when traditional parenting beliefs and practices are not consistent with mainstream norms in the host country. Whereas some culturally embedded parenting beliefs might persist even after migration, others may acculturate or shift to align with child-rearing norms in the host community. Using a qualitative research design with elements of indigenous Filipino psychology (Sikolohiyang Pilipino), this study explored parenting experiences and beliefs of Filipino immigrant parents in the USA, with a specific lens towards examining continuity and change in traditional parenting practices. Results suggest that participants strongly maintain many aspects of traditional Filipino parenting, including teaching Filipino culture and values, employing Filipino parenting practices, observing Filipino traditions, establishing the child’s identity and maintaining a Filipino household. Findings were situated in the context of the research site, the complexities of the acculturation process and the potential challenges of negotiating cultural differences in parenting beliefs and practices.
AlampayL. P. (2014). Parenting in the Philippines. In SelinH.SchvaneveldtP. (Eds), Parenting across cultures: Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (pp. 105–121). The Netherlands: Springer.
2.
AlmirolE. (1985). Ethnic identity and social negotiation: A study of a Filipino community in California. New York, NY: AMS Press, Inc.
3.
AndresT. D.Ilada-AndresP. C. B. (1987). Understanding the Filipino. Quezon City, Metro Manila: New Day Publishers.
4.
BattleD. E. (2009). Multiculturalism, language, and emergent literacy. In RhynerPaula M. (Ed.), Emergent literacy and language development: Promoting learning in early childhood (pp. 192–234). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BirmanD. (2006). Measurement of the ‘acculturation gap’ in immigrant families and implications for parent–child relationships. In BornsteinM.CotesL. (Eds), Acculturation and parent child relationships: Measurement and development (pp. 113–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
BirmanD.PoffM. (2011). Intergenerational differences in acculturation. In BornsteinM.TremblayR.BoivinM.PetersR. (Eds), Encyclopedia on early childhood development. Retrieved from http://www.child-encyclopedia.com
7.
BohrY.TseC. (2009). Satellite babies in transnational families: A study of parents’ decision to separate from their infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(1), 5–25. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj
BornsteinM.CheahC. (2006). The place of ‘culture and parenting’ in the ecological contextual perspective on developmental science. In RubinK. H.ChungO. B. (Eds), Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent-child relations: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–33).New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
BornsteinM. H.CoteL.R. (2001). Mother–infant interaction and acculturation: I. Behavioral comparisons in Japanese American and South American families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(6), 549–563.
11.
BurchinalM.SkinnerD.ReznickJ. S. (2010). European American and African American mothers’ beliefs about parenting and disciplining infants: A mixed-method analysis. Parenting: Science & Practice, 10(2), 79–96. doi: 10.1080/15295190903212604
12.
ChoiY.HeM.HarachiT. (2008). Intergenerational cultural dissonance, parent–child conflict and bonding, and youth problem behaviors among Vietnamese and Cambodian immigrant families. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 37(1), 85–96.
13.
CimentJ. (2010). The Filipino American experience: History and culture. In LingH.AustinA. W. (Eds), Asian American History and Culture, Vol. 1 (pp. 251–310). Oxford: M.E. Sharpe.
14.
CimmarustiR. A. (1996). Exploring aspects of Filipino-American families. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 22(2), 205–217.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
17.
De GuzmanM. R. T. (2014). Yaya: Philippine domestic care workers, the children they care for, and the children they leave behind. International Perspectives in Psychology, 3(2), 197–214.
18.
De GuzmanM. R. T.GarciaA. S. (2017). From bonds to bridges and back again: Co-ethnic ties and the making of Filipino community in Poland. Journal of Ethnic Migration and Studies, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1309969
19.
De GuzmanM. R. T.BrownJ.CarloG.KnightG. P. (2012). What does it mean to be prosocial? A cross-ethnic study of parental beliefs. Psychology and Developing Societies, 24(2), 239–268.
20.
De GuzmanM. R. T.DeLeónJ. G.CantareroR.Gonzalez-KrugerG. E. (2010). Conceptions regarding children’s health: An examination of ethnotheories in a sending and receiving community. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 38(3), 256–272.
21.
DelaCruzM.Agbayani-SiewertP. A. (2003). Swimming with and against the tide. In LaiE.ArguellesD. (Eds), The new face of Asian Pacific America: Numbers, diversity, & change in the 21st Century (pp. 45–50). San Francisco, CA: AsianWeek.
22.
DelaCruzT.Protacio-MarcelinoE.BalanonF.YacatJ.FranciscoC. (2001). Trust and power: Child abuse in the eyes of the child and the parent. Manila, the Philippines: UPCIDS Psychosocial Trauma and Human Rights Program.
23.
Dedoose Version 7.1.3. (2016). Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. Retrieved from www.dedoose.com
24.
EnriquezV. G. (1994). Pagbabangong-dangal: Psychology and Cultural Empowerment. Quezon City: Akademya ng Kultura at Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
25.
EspirituY. L.WolfD. L. (2001). The paradox of assimilation: Children of Filipino immigrants in San Diego. In RumbaurR. G.PortesA. (Eds), Ethnicities: Children of immigrants in America (pp. 157–158). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26.
FinlayL. (2002). ‘Outing’ the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.
27.
HarknessS.MoscardinoU.BermudezM. R.ZyliczP. O.Welles-NyströmB.BlomM. …SuperC. M. (2006). Mixed methods in international collaborative research: The experiences of the international study of parents, children, and the schools. Cross-cultural Research, 40(1), 65–82.
28.
HarknessS.SuperC. M. (2006). Themes and variations: Parental ethnotheories in Western cultures. In RubinK.ChungO. B. (Eds), Parental beliefs, parenting, and child development in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 61–79). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
HarknessS.SuperC. M.BermúdezM.MoscardinoU.RhaJ.MavridisC. …ZyliczP. (2010). Parental ethnotheories of children’s learning. In LancyD. F.BockJ.GaskinsS. (Eds), The anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 65–81). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
30.
HarwoodR.LeyendeckerB.CarlsonV.AsencioM.MillerA. (2002). Parenting among Latino families in the US. In BornsteinM. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 4. Social conditions and applied parenting (2nd ed., pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
HsiehH. F.ShannonS. (2005), Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
32.
IrukaI. U.DurdenT.KennelP. (2015). Changing faces: Parenting, culture, and child learning and development. Zero to Three Journal: Culture, Parenting, and Child Development, 35(4), 10–18.
MedinaB. T. G. (2001). The Filipino family (2nd ed.). Quezon City: University of the Philippine Press.
35.
MoscardinoU.NwobuO.AxiaG. (2006). Cultural beliefs and practices related to infant health and development among Nigerian immigrant mothers in Italy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 24(3), 241–255.
36.
NadalK. L. (2011). Filipino American psychology: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37.
ParmarP.HarknessS.SuperC. M. (2004). Asian and Euro-American parents’ ethnotheories of play and learning: Effects on preschool children’s home routines and school behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 97–104. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000307
38.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
39.
Pe-PuaR. (2006). From decolonizing psychology to the development of a cross-indigenous perspective in methodology: The Philippine experience. In KimU.YangK. S.HwangK. K. (Eds), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 109–137). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/0–387–28662–4_5
40.
Pe-PuaR.Protacio-MarcelinoE. (2000). Filipino psychology: A legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 49–71.
Plata-PotterS. I.de GuzmanM. R. T.(2012). Mexican immigrant families crossing the education border: A phenomenological study.Journal of Latinos and Education, 11(2), 94–106.
43.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
Roer-StrierD. (1997). In the mind of the beholder: Evaluation of coping styles of immigrant parents. International Migration, 35(2), 271.
46.
Roer-StrierD. (2001). Reducing risk for children in changing cultural contexts: Recommendations for intervention and training. Child Abuse and Neglect, 125(2), 231–248.
47.
RosenthalM. K.Roer-StrierD. (2001). Cultural differences in mothers’ developmental goals and ethnotheories. International Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 20–31.
48.
SpringM.WestermeyerJ.HalconL.SavikK.RobertsonC.Johnson…JaransonJ. (2003). Sampling in difficult to access refugee and immigrant communities. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191(12), 813–819.
49.
SrivastavaD.de GuzmanM. R. T. (2017). Why I sent my child away: Long distance parenting among migrant parents from Southern India. Psychology and Developing Societies, 29(1), 1–21.
50.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
51.
SuizzoM. (2007). Parents’ goals and values for children: Dimensions of independence and interdependence across four US ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 38(4), 506–530.
52.
SuperC. M.HarknessS. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9(4), 545–569.
53.
SuperC. M.HarknessS. (1993). The developmental niche. In LonnerW. J.MalpassR. S. (Eds), Readings in psychology and culture (pp. 95–100). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
54.
TestJ. (2015). The influence of culture in infant-toddler child care settings. Zero to Three Journal: Culture, Parenting, and Child Development, 35(4), 19–26.
ThomasW. C.TumanJ. P.StevensonM. T. (2011). Immigration and ethnic diversity in Nevada. In ShalinD. N. (Ed.), The social health of Nevada: Leading indicators and quality of life in the silver state. Las Vegas, NV: UNLV Center for Democratic Culture. Retrieved from http://cdclv.unlv.edu/mission/index.html
WangS.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.(2003). Do child-rearing values in Taiwan and the United States reflect cultural values of collectivism and individualism?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(6), 629–642.
61.
WhitingJ. W. M.ChildI. L.LambertW. W.FischerA. M.FischerJ. L.NydeggerC.… RomneyR. (1966). Six cultures series, Vol. 1: Field guide for a study of socialization. New York, NY: Wiley.
62.
XuY.FarverJ. M.ZhangZ.ZengQ.YuL.CaiB. (2005). Mainland Chinese parenting styles and parent–child interaction. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 524–531.
63.
YamanA.MesmanJ.IjzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.LintingM. (2010). Parenting in an individualistic culture with a collectivistic cultural background: The case of Turkish immigrant families with toddlers in the Netherlands. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(5), 617–628.
