Social Networking Sites (SNSs) such as Facebook have made inroads in the life of users. The current study used a quantitative approach to explore adolescents’ usage of SNS in Mumbai and their perceptions and experiences of the same. The sample consisted of 121 adolescent boys and girls in the age group of 13–18 years. Easily accessible Internet and availability of devices such as smartphones influenced access to SNS. Computer-mediated-communication was the preferred means of communication. Selective self-representation and online social comparison were pertinent themes seen through the study. Gender and age differences were found in the overall usage and experiences of SNS. Parental involvement and monitoring resulted in adolescents engaging in privacy management and helped control risky online behaviour. Overall, adolescents reported more positive experiences with SNS.
ArnettJ. J. (2007). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Incorporated.
2.
BoydD. M.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
3.
CampbellJ.ShermanR. C.KranE.BirchmeierZ. (2005). Internet privacy awareness and concerns among college students. Paper presented at APS, Toronto. Retrieved from http://www.users.muohio.edu/shermarc/aps01.htm
4.
ChaudharyN.SharmaN. (2012). Adolescent psychology around the world, (pp. 103–118). New York: Psychology Press.
ChouH. G.EdgeN. (2012). ‘They are happier and having better lives than I am’: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117–121.
7.
Clarke BarbieH. (2009). Early adolescents’ use of social networking sites to maintain friendship and explore identity: Implications for policy. Policy & Internet, 1(1), Article 3, 55–89.
GoswamiS.(2010). Indian diaspora’s use of social networking sites for identity construction and community building: The case of Indians in London (IIL) Community on Orkut (Masters Thesis, Roskilde University, Denmark) Retrieved18July2014, from http://www.academia.edu/807246/INDIAN_DIASPORAS_USE_OF_SOCIAL_NETWORKING_SITES
17.
GreenfieldS. (2015). Mind Change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York: Random House.
18.
LearyM. R. (1996). Self-presentation—Impression management and interpersonal behaviour. Boulder, CO: Westview
19.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375.
20.
McQuailD. (2005). Mcquail’s mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
MorenoM. A.VanderStoepA.ParksM. R.ZimmermanF. J.KurthA.ChristakisD. A. (2009). Reducing at-risk adolescents’ display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: A randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 163(1), 35–41. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.502.
PapacharissiZ. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and A Small World. New Media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220. doi: 10.1177/1461444808099577
PradeepP.SriramS. (2014). The virtual life of adolescents: A study on adolescents’ use of social networking sites. The Bombay Psychologist., XXIX (1&2), 33–37.
27.
SriramS.GinsuanlianH. (2013). Youth engagement in the online world. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
SternS. R. (2004). Expressions of identity online: Prominent features and gender differences in adolescents’ world wide web home pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(2), 218–243. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4802_4
29.
SubrahmanyamK.GreenfieldP.M. (2008). Communicating online: Adolescent relationships and the media. The Future of Children; Children and Media Technology, 18, 119–146. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0006
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267–277.
33.
VanderhovenE.SchellensT.ValckeM.RaesA. (2014). How safe do teenagers behave on Facebook? An observational study. PLoS ONE9(8): e104036. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104036
34.
VermaS.SaraswathiT. S. (2002). Adolescence in India: Street urchins or Silicon Valley millionaires? In BrownB. B.LarsonR. W.SaraswathiT. S. (Eds) The World’s Youth: Adolescence in eight regions of the globe, (pp. 105–140). New York: Cambridge University Press.
ZhaoS.GrasmuckS.MartinJ. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in human behaviour, 24(5), 1816–1836.
