Psychological separation from parents is considered an important task in the development of the autonomous self. However, theorising about the importance of autonomy from parents for normal development has originated from individualistic cultures that socialise for independence. Urban, Pakistani middle-class, early and late adolescents completed measures related to behavioural autonomy (BA), emotional autonomy (EA) and detachment, and completed measures of psychological adjustment. Low detachment from parents and early BA in matters of personal choice is associated with good psychological adjustment. In contrast to the West where detachment is adaptive in families where parenting is not optimal, detach ment was not associated with good functioning even when parents are not perceived as sup portive. The pattern of findings complement those from the West, but also emphasise some important differences in the persistence of emotional interdependence across generations that distinguish this collective culture from individualistic western cultures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, F.M., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America's perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.
2.
Barber, B. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296-3319.
3.
—. (1997). Adolescent socialization in context: The role of connection, regulation and autonomy in the family. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 5-11.
4.
Blood, P.R. (1995). Pakistan: A country study (On-line).
5.
Chao, R.K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training . Child Development, 65, 1111-19.
6.
Feldman, S.S., & Quatman, T. (1988). Factors influencing age expectations for adolescent autonomy. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 325-43.
7.
Feldman, S.S., & Rosenthal, D.A. (1990). The acculturation of autonomy expectations in Chinese high schoolers. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 259-81.
8.
—. (1991). Age expectations of behavioral autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: The influence of family variables and adolescents' values. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 1-23.
9.
Fielding, R., Li, J., & Tang, Y.E. (1995). Health care utilisation as a function of subjective health status, job satisfaction and gender among health care workers in Guangzhou , Southern China. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1103-10.
10.
Fuhrman, T., & Holmbeck, G. (1995). A contextual-moderator analysis of emotional autonomy and adjustment in adolescence. Child Development, 66, 793-811.
11.
Government of Pakistan, Population and Housing Census, 1998. Census Bulletin 6. Islamabad: Population Census Organization.
12.
Human Development Report. (1995). United Nations Development Program. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Kagitçibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Mann, E.A. (1994). Education, money and the role of women in maintaining minority identity. In Z. Hasan (Ed.), Forging identities: Sex, communities and the state (pp. 130-68). New Delhi: Raj Press.
15.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, motivation, and emotion. Psychological Review, 98, 224-53.
16.
Miles, M. (1992). Concepts of mental retardation in Pakistan: Toward cross-cultural and historical perspectives. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 235-55.
17.
Obeid, R.A. (1988). An Islamic theory of human development. In T.R. Murray (Ed.), Oriental Theories of Human Development (pp. 155-74). New York: Peter Lang & Company.
18.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-72.
19.
Rohner, R., & Pettengill, S.M. (1985). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents. Child Development , 56, 524-28.
20.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
21.
Ryan, R., Deci, E., & Grolnick, W. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Development Psychopathology, vol. 1 (pp. 618-55). New York: Wiley.
22.
Ryan, R., & Lynch, J. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 344-56.
23.
Schneider, B. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison as doorkeeper in research on the social and emotional adjustment of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 34, 793-97.
24.
Schwartz, S. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi , S.C. Chow, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 85-122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Silverberg, S., & Gondoli, D. (1996). Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective . In G. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 12-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
Steinberg, L. (1990). Autonomy, conflict and harmony in the family relationship . In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 255-76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S.M., & Brown, B.B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-29.
28.
Steinberg, L., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S., & Dornbusch, S. (1991). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across various ecological niches. Journal of Research on Adolescence , 1, 19-36.
29.
Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-51.
30.
Stewart, S.M., Bond, M.H., Abdullah, A.S.M., & Ma, S. (2000). Gender, parenting and adolescent functioning in Bangladesh. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 46, 540-64.
31.
Stewart, S.M., Bond, M.H., Deeds, O., & Chung, S.F. (1999). Intergenerational patterns of values and autonomy expectations in cultures of relatedness and separate-ness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 575-93.
32.
Stewart, S.M., Bond, M.H., Ho, L.M., Zaman, R.M., Dar, R., & Anwar, M. (2000). Perceptions of parents and adolescent outcomes in Pakistan. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 335-52.
33.
Stewart, S.M., Bond, M.H., Zaman, R.M., McBride-Chang, C., Rao, N., & Fielding, R. (1999). Functional parenting in Pakistan. Inter Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 747-70.
34.
Stewart, S.M., Rao, N., Bond, M.H., Fielding, R., McBRIDE-CHANG, C., & Kennard, B.D. (1998). Chinese dimensions of parenting: Broadening western predictors and outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 345-58.
35.
Triandis, H. (1994). Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi, S.C. Chow , & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 41-51). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
36.
World Development Indicators ( 2000). (CD-ROM). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
