This article provides a general overview of methodology as a cyclical process of conceptually integrating assumptions, theory, phenomenon, and methods with the goal of deriving data appropriate for the elaboration of the theory. Next it considers the role of the researcher's subjectivity in the methodology cycle, and issues of validity, meaning, and interpretation. Then, it approaches the issue of methodology by linking a particular conceptual framework, a cultural psychology, and a focal phenomenon, personal meaning construction, with a suit able method for its investigation, the reflective interview. Finally, it presents empirical material derived using the reflective interview as a data construction method in a study of personal meaning construction, conducted with upper-middle class, professional, U.S.- American women with young children. Analyses of this empirical material examine meaning construction processes as modes of "working through" cultural material to construct the personal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Balantine Books.
2.
Bellah, R.N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
Benigni, L., & Valsiner, J. (1995). "Amoral familism" and child development: Edward Banfield and the understanding of child socialization in Southern Italy. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Child development within culturally structured environments. Vol. 3. Comparative-cultural and constructivist perspectives (pp. 83-104). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
4.
Berger, J.O., & Berry, D.A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity . American Scientist, 76, 159-65.
5.
Berlin, I. (1991). Giambattista Vico and cultural history. In H. Hardy (Ed.), I. Berlin, The crooked timber of humanity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
6.
Branco, A.U., & Valsiner, J. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 35-64.
7.
Briggs, C.L. (1986). Learning how to ask: Vol. 1. Studies in the social and cultural found. ations of language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Bryant, A. (16 November 1997). In case of working mothers, plenty of judges. The New York Times, pp. B1, B14.
9.
Chodorow (1995). Gender as a personal and cultural construction. Signs , 20, 216-44.
10.
Danziger, K. (1990). Reconstructing the subject. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22,597-618.
12.
Dembo, T., Leviton, G.L., & Wright, B.A. (1975). Adjustment to misfortune: A problem of social-psychological rehabilitation [Special issue]. Rehabilitation Psychology , 22.
13.
Duncker, K. (1926). An experimental and theoretical study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). M.A. Thesis, Psychology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
14.
Elias, N. (1991). Society of individuals. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
15.
Farr, R.M. (1998). From collective to social representations: Aller et retour. Culture & Psychology, 4, 275-96.
16.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Ginsberg, H.P. (1998). Entering the child's mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Greenfield, P.M. (1997). Culture as process: Empirical methodology for cultural psychology. In J.W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Theory and method: Vol.1. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachiotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
20.
Kindermann, T., & Valsiner, J. (1989). Strategies for empirical research in context-inclusive developmental psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Cultural context and child development (pp. 13-50). Toronto -Göttingen-Bern: C. J. Hogrefe and H. Huber.
21.
Lotman Yu. M. (1989). The semiosphere. SovietPsychology , 27, 40-61.
22.
Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research . Harvard Education Review, 62, 279-300.
23.
Meehl, P.E. (1986). What social scientists don't understand. In D.W. Fiske & R.A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 315-38). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
24.
Mishler, E.G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
25.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
—. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations . European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-50.
27.
Morgan, C.L. (1984). An introduction to comparative psychology. London: Walter Scott Ltd.
28.
Oakes, G. (1980). Introduction. In G. Simmel, Essays on interpretation in social science (G. Oakes, Ed. & Trans.), pp. 3-93. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
29.
Obeyesekere, G. (1977). Psychocultural exegesis of a case of spirit possession in Sri Lanka. In V. Crapanzano & V. Garrison (Eds.), Case studies in spirit possession (pp. 235-94). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
—. (1990). The work of culture. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
31.
Rivers, Caryl (19 July 1998). Working moms acquitted: An argument that, despite the myths, these women are not destroying their children, families, or society (Review of the book Not guilty: The good news about working mothers) . Boston Globe, pp. B1, B3.
32.
Rosaldo, M. (1984). Toward an anthropology of self and feeling. In R.A. Shweder & R.A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 137-57). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Sigel, I. (1993). The centrality of a distancing model for the development of representational competence. In R.R. Cocking & K.A. Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 141-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Simmel, G. (1980). Essays on interpretation in social science. G. Oakes (Ed. & Trans.)Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
35.
Simon, H. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
36.
Thorngate, W. (1986). Individual approaches to the study of development . In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject in developmental psychology (pp. 71-93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Valsiner, J. (1989). Human development and culture. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co.
38.
—. (1997). Culture and the development of children's action (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
39.
—. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Valsiner, J., Branco, A.U., & Melo Dantas, C. (1997). Co-construction of human development: Heterogeneity within parental belief orientations. In J.E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and the transmission of values (pp. 283-304). New York: Wiley .
41.
Wagner, W. (1998) Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping, and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology , 4, 297-329.
42.
Wertheimer, M. (1982). Productive thinking. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
43.
Winegar, L.T. (1997). Developmental research and comparative perspectives: Applications to developmental science. In J. Tudge, M.J. Shanahan, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Comparisons in human development: Understanding time and context (pp. 13-33). New York: Cambridge University Press.
