This article is an attempt to measure the degree of mechanisation in the coir industry of Kerala for eliciting the firm-specific determinants of mechanisation. The study uses primary data collected from 115 coir manufacturers of Alappuzha district by using simple random sampling. It starts with measuring the degree of mechanisation of the selected coir firms in Kerala using two indices: extent of mechanisation (EM) and mechanisation index (MI). After that, the coir industry of Kerala is categorised into four levels of mechanisation, namely, traditional firms, low mechanised firms, medium mechanised firms and high mechanised firms using MI. The study found that, majority of the coir producing firms of Kerala belongs to traditional and low mechanised levels. The firm-specific determinants of the mechanisation are identified using a Tobit regression analysis and the results reveal that, firm size, participation in promotional programmes and the average education of the labour positively influences the MI whereas, the presence of labour union inversely affects it.
AdewuyiS. A., AshaoluO. F., AyindeI. A., & OgundeleS. O. (2006). Determinants of farm mechanization among arable crop farmers in Ibarapa zone, Oyo State, Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1), 49–55.
2.
AmuthaK. (2012). A study on the prospects and problems of coir industry with special reference to Coimbatore district [PhD Thesis]. Bharathiar University.
3.
AshikA. (2018). Socio-economic conditions of coir workers in Kerala. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(20), 4389–4396.
4.
AtanuS., LoveH. A., & SchwartR. (1994). Adoption of emerging technologies under output uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(4), 836–846.
5.
BurtonM., RigbyD., & YoungT. (1999). Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(1), 47–63.
6.
Coir Board. (2008). Study on small-scale sector. Kerala Coir Board.
7.
DaberkowS. G., & McBrideW. D. (2003). Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US. Precision Agriculture, 4(2), 163–177.
8.
GaleH. F.Jr, (1998). Rural manufacturing on the crest of the wave: a count data analysis of technology use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(2), 347–359.
9.
GhoshB. K. (2010). Determinants of farm mechanization in modern agriculture: A case study of Burdwan districts of west Bengal. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(12), 1107–1115.
10.
IsaacT. T. (1983). Class struggle and transition to specifically capitalist form of production: Some conclusions of a Study of Coir Industry in Kerala. Social Scientist, 17(31), 35–46.
11.
IsaacT. T., van StuijvenbergP. A., & NairK. N. (1992). Modernization and employment—The coir industry in Kerala. SAGE Publications.
12.
IssacT. M. T., & MathaiA. (2017). Kerala coir—The agenda for modernisation. National Coir Research and Management Institute, Thiruvananthapuram.
13.
KambleB. H. (2015). Economic analysis and impact assessment of technology adoption for sugarcane in Maharashtra [PhD Thesis]. MPKV University.
14.
KannanK. P. (1976). Implications of technological change. Economic & Political Weekly, 11(40), 1581–1584.
15.
KatungiE. M. (2007). Social capital and technology adoption on small farms: The case of banana production technology in Uganda [PhD Thesis]. University of Pretoria.
16.
KuriakoseS., ZhangC., & GoldbergI. (2011). Technology absorption and its determinants: An introduction. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821388181_CH01
17.
LinJ. Y., & ZhangP. (2009). Industrial structure, appropriate technology and economic growth in less developed countries. The World Bank.
18.
LippertS. K., & DavisM. (2006). A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 434–448.
19.
MohanasundaramD. P. (2015). Production problems faced by coir units: A study in Thanjavur district of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Arts, Humanities and Management Studies, 1(5), 11–19.
20.
NarayanamoorthyA., BhattaraiM., SureshR., & AlliP. (2014). Farm mechanisation, MGNREGS and labour supply nexus: A state-wise panel data analysis on paddy and wheat crop. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 320–335.
21.
OkelloJ. J., KiruiO. K., GitongaZ. M., NjirainiG. W., & NzumaJ. M. (2014). Determinants of awareness and use ICT-based market information services in developing-country agriculture: The case of smallholder farmers in Kenya. Journal of International Agriculture, 53(3), 263–282
22.
OladejiO. O., OkoruwaV. O., OjehomonV. E. T., DiagneA., & ObasoroO. A. (2015). Determinants of awareness and adoption of improved rice varieties in north central, Nigeria. Rice Genomics and Genetics, 6(7), 1–10.
23.
PrakashB. A. (1977). Coir manufacture in the doldrums. Social Scientist, 6(1), 30–40.
24.
RajanA. C., & KumarM. T. B. (2004). Report of the sectoral study on the coir industry. Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation, Government of Kerala.
25.
RammohanK. T. (1999). Technological change in Kerala industry: Lessons from coir yarn spinning. Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies.
26.
SabarinathK. (2000). Modernisation of coir industry in Kerala: A multidimensional impact analysis [PhD Thesis]. University of Pondichery.
27.
VarukoluV. (2007). Technology adoption of Indian garment manufacturing firms [Master’s Thesis]. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
28.
TittyS. V. (2015). Coir yarn spinning units of Panoor Ward. State Planning Board, Thiruvananthapuram.
