Abstract
Through a historical comparative analysis of the two Swiss cantons of Neuchâtel and Glarus, this study seeks to answer the question of how regional governments perceive and address emigration in contexts where it is not prioritised at the national level. Regional responses are significant, as emigration can deepen territorial imbalances and undermine state cohesion. Empirically, the article is based on a qualitative analysis of policy documents and interviews with regional policymakers and officials. It finds that emigration policies are highly selective, embedded within other policy frameworks, and best understood through political intent rather than explicit policy labels. Additionally, emigration is not always problematic and can sometimes serve as a solution, and responses involve incorporating residential-based development strategies rather than relying solely on export-oriented models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
