Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-10
‘Two faces’ of human capital and research and development activities: Effects of related technologies and the regional technology portfolio on total factor productivity in Polish regions
In this article, we study the role of technological relatedness/unrelatedness in explaining the relationship between research and development and human capital and total factor productivity growth at the regional level using system Generalized Method of Moments and statistical data for 16 Polish regions over the period 2003–2019. Using the research and development effects-based approach, we weight the number of patents relative to the employed in the research and development sector by measures that identify related technologies in the regional technology portfolio. Our results show positive and statistically significant effects of human capital and technological relatedness on both technological progress and technology diffusion. Moreover, technological unrelatedness exerts a negative effect on technological progress and does not lead to technology diffusion. The study also shows the importance of local technology resources.
AarstadJKvitasteinOJakobsenSE (2016) Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: a multilevel study. Research Policy45(2016): 844–856.
2.
AbbasiharoftehMKoglerDFLengyelB (2023) Atypical combinations of technologies in regional co-inventor networks. Research Policy52(10): 104886.
3.
AghionPHowittP (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica60(2): 323–351.
4.
AghionPHowittP (2008) The economics of growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
AltuzarraA (2018) R&D and patents: is it a two way street?Economics of Innovation and New Technology28(2): 180–196.
6.
AntonelliCCrespiFMongeau OspinaCAScellatoG (2017) Knowledge composition, Jacobs externalities and innovation performance in European regions. Regional Studies51(11): 1708–1720.
7.
AntoniettiRMontresorS (2021) Trajectories and Key Enabling Technologies (KETs) in Italian Regions. Economic Geography97(2): 187–207.
8.
ArtzKWNormanPMHatfieldDECardinalLB (2010) A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, Patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management27(5): 725–740.
9.
AudretschDBFeldmanMP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In HendersonVThisseJF (ed.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland, pp., 2713–2739.
10.
BadingerHTondlG (2005) The factors behind European regional growth: trade, human capital and innovation. Review of Regional Research25(1): 67–89.
11.
BallandPABoschmaRCrespoJRigbyDL (2019) Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies53(9): 1252–1268.
12.
BanksRB (1994) Growth and Diffusion Phenomena. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
13.
BarroRJLeeJW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics104(C): 184–198.
14.
BasuSWeilDN (1998) Appropriate technology and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics113(4): 1025–1054.
15.
BenhabibJSpiegelMM (2005) Human capital and technology diffusion. In: AghionPDurlaufSN (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 935–966.
16.
BeugelsdijkSKlasingMJMilionisP (2018) Regional economic development in Europe: the role of total factor productivity. Regional Studies52(4): 461–476.
17.
BlundellRBondS (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics24(1): 115–143.
18.
BoschmaR (2017) Relatedness as driver behind regional diversification: a research agenda. Regional Studies51(3): 351–364.
19.
BoschmaRBallandPAKoglerDF (2015) Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change24(1): 223–250.
20.
BoschmaRMiguelezEMorenoROcampo-CorralesDB (2023) The role of relatedness and unrelatedness for the geography of technological breakthroughs in Europe. Economic Geography99(2): 117–139.
21.
BreschiSLissoniF (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography9(4): 439–468.
22.
CameronGProudmanJReddingS (2005) Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review49(3): 775–807.
23.
CapelloRLenziC (2015) Knowledge, innovation and productivity gains across European regions. Regional Studies49(11): 1788–1804.
24.
CaselliF (2005) Accounting for cross country income differences. In AghionPDurlaufS (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 679–741.
25.
CastaldiCFrenkenKLosB (2015) Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: an analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies49(5): 767–781.
26.
CieślikAMisiakT (2023) Related and unrelated variety and convergence to technological frontier: Empirical evidence for Polish regions. European Planning Studies32(3): 648–667.
27.
CohenWMLevinthalDA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal99(397): 569–596.
28.
DahlinKBBehrensDM (2005) When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy34(5): 717–737.
29.
DaviesBMaréDC (2021) Relatedness, complexity and local growth. Regional Studies55(3): 479–494.
30.
DettoriBMarrocuEPaciR (2012) Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European Regions. Regional Studies46(10): 1401–1416.
31.
FarinhaTBallandPAMorrisonABoschmaR (2019) What drives the geography of jobs in the US? Unpacking relatedness. Industry and Innovation26(9): 988–1022.
32.
FrenkenKVan OortFGVerburgT (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies41(5): 685–697.
33.
GrashofNHesseKFornahlD (2019) Radical or not? The role of clusters in the emergence of radical innovations. European Planning Studies27(10): 1904–1923.
34.
GriffithRReddingSVan ReenenJ (2003) R&D and absorptive capacity: theory and empirical evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics105(1): 99–118.
35.
GriffithRReddingSVan ReenenJ (2004) Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics86(4): 883–895.
36.
GrossmanGHelpmanE (1990) Comparative advantage and long-run growth. American Economic Review80(4): 796815.
37.
GrossmanGHelpmanE (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
HartogMBoschmaRSotarautaM (2012) The impact of related variety on regional employment growth in Finland 1993–2006: high-tech versus medium/lowtech. Industry and Innovation19(6): 459–476.
HidalgoCKlingerBBarabassiAHausmannR (2007) The product space conditions the development of nations. Science317(5837): 482–487.
41.
HidalgoCA (2021) Economic complexity theory and applications. Nature Reviews Physics3(2): 92–113.
42.
HidalgoCABallandPABoschmaRDelgadoMFeldmanMFrenkenKZhuS (2018) The principle of relatedness. In MoralesAJGershensonCBrahDMinaiAABar-YamY (eds), Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Complex Systems 9. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 451–457.
43.
InklaarRTimmerMP (2013) Capital, Labor and TFP in PWT8.0 (Mimeo). Groningen: University of Groningen.
44.
JacobsJ (1969) The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
45.
KaplanSVakiliK (2015) The double-edge sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal36(10): 1435–1457.
46.
KimSHJunBLeeJD (2023) Technological relatedness: how do firms diversify their technology?Scientometrics128(1): 1–3.
47.
MännasooKHeinHRuubelR (2018) The contributions of human capital, R&D spending and Convergence to total factor productivity growth. Regional Studies52(12): 1598–1611.
48.
MartynovichMTaalbiJ (2020) Related Variety, Recombinant Knowledge and Regional Innovation. Evidence for Sweden, 1991–2010, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 20.15. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
49.
MewesL (2019) Scaling of atypical knowledge combinations in American metropolitan areas from 1836 to 2010. Economic Geography95(4): 341–361.
50.
MontresorFQuatraroF (2017) Regional branching and Key enabling technologies: evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography93(4): 367–396.
51.
NeffkeFHenningMBoschmaR (2011) How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography87(3): 237–265.
52.
NelsonRRPhelpsES (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. American Economic Review of Economic Studies56(1/2): 69–75.
53.
NickellS (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica49(6): 1399–1416.
54.
PsacharopoulosG (1994) Returns to investment in education: a global update. World Development22(9): 1325–1343.
55.
RigbyDLRoeslerCKoglerDBoschmaRBallandP-A (2022) Do EU regions benefit from smart specialization principles?Regional Studies56(12): 2058–2073.
56.
RomerP (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy98(5–2): 71–102.
57.
RomerP (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives8(1): 3–22.
58.
RoodmanD (2009) How to do Xtabond2: an Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal9(1): 86–136.
59.
RoperSHewitt-DundasN (2015) Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data. Research Policy44(7): 1327–1340.
60.
RovigattiGMollisiV (2018) Theory and practice of total-factor productivity estimation: the control function approach using Stata. The Stata Journal18(3): 618–662.
61.
SaviottiPPFrenkenK (2008) Trade variety and economic development of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics18(2): 201–218.
62.
SchatzerTSillerMWaldeJTappeinerG (2019) The impact of model choice on estimates of regional TFP. International Regional Science Review42(1): 98–116.
63.
SillerMSchatzerTWaldeJTappeinerG (2021) What drives total factor productivity growth? An examination of spillover effects. Regional Studies55(6): 1129–1139.
64.
VogelJ (2015) The two faces of R&D and human capital: evidence from Western European regions. Papers in Regional Science94(3): 525–551.
65.
WindmeijerF (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics126(1): 25–51.
66.
WooldridgeJM (2009) On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters104(3): 112–114.
