Gray legality: Varying degrees of housing illegality in Berlin’s rental cap

Abstract

This study aims to understand how housing legality is negotiated and contextually constructed by investigating the highly regulated German context of Berlin. It investigates the varying tenants’ experiences affected by the enforcement and abolition of the city’s rental cap law (Berliner Mietendeckel-Geset), implemented between February 2020 and April 2021. The article frames the case study of Berlin in the context of legality and develops a typology of legal and illegal practices within this case. Through collecting data from 19 tenants using semi-structured interviews to identify recurring narratives and experiences, the article explores how legality is negotiated and socially constructed. The results suggest that a spectrum of gray legality emerges from these negotiations, breaking the binary view of legality in the Global North. This spectrum covers legality, semi-legality, semi-illegality, and illegality. Gray legality refers to incidents where it becomes hard to judge the complete adherence or lack of compliance with a law. Hence, this article contributes to understanding illegality as a state–society relationship defined not only by laws and regulations but also by publicly accepted practices and the often-untraceable stakeholder negotiations.

Keywords

Global North gray legality housing legality housing policies urban informality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera

Smart

(2016) Squatting, north, south, and turnabout: a dialogue comparing illegal housing research. In: Anders

Sedlmaier

(eds) Public Goods Versus Economic Interests: Global Perspectives on the History of Squatting. New York: Routledge, pp. 35–61.

Aldrich

Sandhu

(eds) (1995) Housing the Urban Poor: Policy and Practice in Developing Countries. London: Zed Books.

Alterman

Calor

(2020) Between informal and illegal in the global north: planning law, enforcement, and justifiable noncompliance. In: Grashoff

(ed.) Comparative Approaches to Informal Housing around the Globe. London: University College London Press, pp. 150–185.

Chiodelli

(2019) The dark side of urban informality in the global north: Housing illegality and organized crime in Northern Italy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 43(3): 497–516.

Chiodelli

Hall

Hudson

Moroni

(2018) Grey governance and the development of cities and regions: the variable relationship between (Il)legal and (Il)licit. In: Chiodelli

Hall

Hudson

(eds) The Illicit and Illegal in the Development and Governance of Cities and Regions: Corrupt Places. London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.

Colomb

Moreira de Souza

(2023) Illegal short-term rentals, regulatory enforcement and informal practices in the age of digital platforms. European Urban and Regional Studies. Epub ahead of print 1 March. DOI: 10.1177/09697764231155386

Connolly

(2021) Berlin’s rent cap is illegal, Germany’s highest court rules. The Guardian, 15 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/15/germany-highest-court-rules-berlin-rent-cap-illegal#:~:text=Germany’s%20highest%20court%20has%20ruled,to%20keep%20the%20city%20affordable.

Coslovsky

Pires

Silbey

(2011) The pragmatic politics of regulatory enforcement. In: Levi-Faur

(ed.) Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 322–334.

Davis

(2006) Planet of Slums. London: Verso Press.

10.

De Rosa

Trabalzi

(2016) Everybody does it, or how illegality is socially constructed in a Southern Italian food network. Journal of Rural Studies 45(6): 303–311.

11.

Devraj

(2022) Berlin’s worsening housing crisis: how a failed rental referendum impacted its population and Europe’s refugees. The Economics Review, 30 November. Available at: https://theeconreview.com/2022/11/30/berlins-worsening-housing-crisis-how-a-failed-rental-referendum-impacted-its-population-and-europes-refugees/#:~:text=Berlin’s%20soaring%20rents%2C%20increasing%2085,their%20need%20for%20affordable%20housing.

12.

Dwyer

Buckle

(2009) The space between: on being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(1): 54–63.

13.

European Commission (2014) Rental market regulation in the European Union. European Economy—Economic Papers 2008—2015 515, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), Brussels.

14.

Ewick

Silbey

(1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Favell

(2016) Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. New York: Springer.

16.

Fernandes

Varley

(1998) The political uses of illegality: evidence from Urban Mexico. In: Fernandes

Varley

(eds) Illegal Cities. London: Zed Books, pp. 172–190.

17.

Flores

Schachter

(2018) Who are the ‘Illegals’? The social construction of illegality in the United States. American Sociological Review 83(5): 839–868.

18.

Fritzon

(2020) Rent controls: how they damage the housing market, the economy and society. Report, Epicenter Press, Washington, DC, January

19.

Gesetz-und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin (2020) Law on the revision of statutory provisions on rent caps. Available at: https://www.berlin.de/sen/justiz/service/gesetze-und-verordnungen/2020/ausgabe-nr-6-vom-22-2-2020-s-49-56.pdf (accessed 1 May 2023).

20.

Given

(ed) (2008) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

21.

Guthmann

(2019) Rent Cap. What it is and what it means for landlords in Berlin. Guthmann Estate. Available at: https://guthmann.estate/en/blog/rent-cap-berlin-update/

22.

Guthmann

(2023) Real estate report Berlin 2023. Guthmann Estate. Available at: https://guthmann.estate/en/market-report/berlin/ (accessed 8 April 2023)

23.

Hahn

Kholodilin

Waltl

(2021) Forward to the past: Short-term effects of the rent freeze in Berlin. Luxembourg Institute of Socio-economic Research (LISER), Working Paper N 2021-03. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3842947-DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3842947

24.

Hanhörster

Ramos Lobato

(2021) Migrants’ access to the rental housing market in Germany: housing providers and allocation policies. Urban Planning 6(2): 7–18.

25.

Harris

(2010) Discretion and expediency in the enforcement of planning controls. Town Planning Review 81(6): 675–700.

26.

Harris

(2021) The exception to the rule: exploring the exception and the exceptional in planning policy. Town Planning Review 92(5): 517–536.

27.

Harris

(2018) Modes of informal urban development: a global phenomenon. Journal of Planning Literature 33(3): 267–286.

28.

Holm

(2012) Interview: Der Mittelstand ist unter Druck [Interview]. Berliner Zeitung, 2 February. Available at: https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/mensch-metropole/interview-der-mittelstand-ist-unter-druck-li.7008?pid=true

29.

Holm

(2013) Berlin’s gentrification mainstream. In: Bernt

(ed.) The Berlin Reader: A Compendium on Urban Change and Activism. Bielefeld: Transcript-verl.

30.

Huesmann

(2020) Berlin’s New Rent Cap Bill: A Controversy Dividing the City?. Master’s Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

31.

Kandler

(2021) The rent cap in Berlin for furnished apartments FAQ. Crocodilian Blog—The Temporary Rental Blog from Berlin. Available at: https://crocodilian.de/short-term-rental-blog/rent-cap-faq-berlin/

32.

Keating

Kahn

(2002) Rent control in the New Millennium. Race, Poverty & the Environment 9(1): 30–33.

33.

King

(1991) Urbanism, Colonialism, and the World- Economy. New York: Routledge.

34.

Knight

(2021a) Berlin’s revolutionary Rent Cap—success or flop? DW: Made for Minds, 23 February. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/berlins-revolutionary-rent-cap-success-or-flop/a-56664706

35.

Knight

(2021b) Berlin rent cap overturned by Germany’s top court. DW: Made for Minds, 15 April. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-rent-cap-overturned-by-germanys-top-court/a-57209268#:~:text=The%20court%20ruling%20found%20that,was%20therefore%20null%20and%20void (accessed 8 April 2023).

36.

Knopp

(1990) Exploiting the rent cap: the theoretical significance of using illegal appraisal schemes to encourage gentrification in New Orleans. Urban Geography 11(1): 48–64.

37.

Kumar

(1996) Landlordism in third world urban low-income settlements: a case for further research. Urban Studies 33(4–5): 753–782.

38.

Lindbeck

(1967) Rent control as an instrument of housing policy. In: Nevitt

(ed.) The Economic Problems of Housing. International Economic Association. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 53–72.

39.

Madden

Vasudevan

(2021) Berlin’s rent cap, though defeated in court, shows how to cool overheated markets. The Guardian, 23 April. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/23/berlin-rent-cap-defeated-landlords-empty#:~:text=The%20cap%20prevented%20owners%20of,new%20law%20faced%20heavy%20fines.

40.

Möbert

Schneider

(2021) German rent cap. Report, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt, 19 April. Available at: https://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/RPS_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000517896/German_rent_cap%3A_Probably_only_under_a_green-red-r.PDF?undefined&realload=a6l9RgMPz5gXuCHcJyB70616W3TK8Sqa0MkgAFCV9TrIryJLcR/NsxXuCv/EpXiD

41.

Musaddique

(2019) Germans take to streets in rent rise protests demanding more homes to become social housing. Euronews, 6 April. Available at: https://www.euronews.com/2019/04/06/germans-take-to-streets-in-rent-rise-protests-demanding-government-takeover-large-private

42.

OECD (2012) OECD economic surveys: Sweden 2012. OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-sweden-2012_eco_surveys-swe-2012-en

43.

Olivera

(2011) Roms En (Bidon) Villes. Paris: Rue d’Ulm.

44.

Paul

(2020) Berlin’s “Shadow Rent” Problem, Explained. Berliner Zeitung, 26 November. Available at: https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/en/shadow-rents-are-becoming-a-major-problem-li.121805

45.

Pizzo

Altavilla

(2017) Embedding illegality, or when the illegal becomes licit: planning cases and urban transformations in Rome. In: Chiodelli

Hall

Hudson

(Eds) The Illicit and Illegal in Regional and Urban Governance and Development. New York: Routledge, p. 164.

46.

Rasquin

(2021) Tenancy laws in Berlin: how rent control impedes residential construction, creates black markets, and harms the poor. Mcgill GLSA Research Series 1(1): 1–21.

47.

Reimer

(2015) Bundestag Beschließt Mietpreisbremse. Deutscher Bundestag. Available at: https://www.bundestag.de/webarchiv/textarchiv/2015/kw10_de_mietpreisbremse-362998 (accessed 10 May 2023).

48.

Rigo

(2011) Citizens despite borders: challenges to the territorial order of Europe. In: Squire

(ed.) The Contested Politics of Mobility: Borderzones and Irregularity. New York: Routledge, pp. 199–215.

49.

Roy

(2005) Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 71(2): 147–158.

50.

Roy

(2011) Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(2): 223–238.

51.

Ruonavaara

(2017) Retrenchment and social housing: the case of Finland. Critical Housing Analysis 4(2): 8–18.

52.

Sagner

Voigtländer

(2022) Supply side effects of the Berlin rent freeze. International Journal of Housing Policy 23(4): 692–711.

53.

Sassen

(2002) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

54.

Schede

Schuldt

J-F

Conrad

Enaux

(2020) Berlin rent price cap “Berliner Mietendeckel” – 12 constitutional complaints filed with the federal Supreme Court. Greenberg Traurig LLP. Available at: https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2020/6/update-berlin-rent-price-cap-12-constitutional-complaints (accessed 10 May 2023).

55.

Smart

(2001) Unruly places: urban governance and the persistence of illegality in Hong Kong’s urban squatter areas. American Anthropologist 103(1): 30–44.

56.

Smart

(2003) Impeded self-help: toleration and the proscription of housing consolidation in Hong Kong’s squatter areas. Habitat International 27(3): 205–225.

57.

Smart

(2006a) Expansion and exclusion in Hong Kong’s squatter resettlement program: the ratchet of exclusion into temporary and interim housing. In: Thomas-Houston

Schuller

(Eds) Homing Devices: The Poor as Targets of Public Housing Policy and Practice. Lanham: Lexington, pp. 181–198.

58.

Smart

(2006b) The Shek Kip Mei Myth: Squatters, Fires and Colonial Rule in Hong Kong, 1950–63. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

59.

Squire

(2021) The construction and contestation of illegality. In: Carmel

(ed.) Handbook on the Governance and Politics of Migration. Gloucestershire, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 137–147.

60.

Tanasescu

(2009) Informal housing in the heart of the New West: an examination of state toleration of illegality in calgary. North American Dialogue 12(2): 1–11.

61.

Tanasescu

Wing- tak

Smart

(2010) Tops and bottoms: state tolerance of illegal housing in Hong Kong and Calgary. Habitat International 34(4): 478–484.

62.

Turner

Malpezzi

(2003) A review of empirical evidence on the costs and benefits of rent control. Swedish Economic Policy Review 10(2003): 11–56.

63.

Urban

(2018) Large housing estates of Berlin, Germany. In: Hess

Tammaru

Van Ham

(eds) Housing estates in Europe. New York: Springer, pp. 99–120.

64.

World Bank (2014) Sweden’s business climate: opportunities for entrepreneurs through improved regulations. Report No. 100920, World Bank, Washington, DC.

65.

Yung

YAU

(2022) Housing as a nexus of unaffordability, illegality and livability. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/special_issues/building_illegality

66.

Zanfi

(2013) The Città Abusiva in contemporary Southern Italy: illegal building and prospects for change. Urban Studies 50(16): 3428–3445.