This paper explores the dynamics of urban policy transfer in the European Union (EU), critically examining the process of Europeanization in relation to urban issues. The paper takes a comparative approach, analysing the evolution of urban policy and Europeanization in four member states: France, Italy, Spain and the UK from the 1990s up to the current Cohesion Policy period (2014–2020). Using an analytical framework based on three dimensions of Europeanization (direction, object and impact), we examine the extent to which urban policies are moving towards an integrated approach to sustainable urban development, as supported by the EU. The paper highlights the contradictions between processes of convergence through Europeanization, and path-dependent systems and trajectories that forge alternative paths. In doing so, it advances wider debates on the impact of Europeanization in a neo-liberal context by arguing that member states more likely to be affected by Europeanization are those most impacted by national austerity measures. A process of ‘variegated Europeanization’ is proposed to capture the differential practices taking place within the EU with regard to the circulation of the EU’s approach to urban policy.
BillingCMcCannPOrtega-ArgilésR (2019) Interregional inequalities and UK sub-national governance responses to Brexit. Regional Studies53(5): 741–760.
5.
BörzelTRisseT (2000) When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change. Paper RSC 2000/56. Florence: European University Institute.
6.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks10(2): 182–222.
7.
BrunazzoM (2010) From policy-taker to policy-shaper: the Europeanization of the Italian cohesion policy. World Political Science Review6(1): 1–28.
8.
BulmerSBurchM (2000) The Europeanization of British Central Government. In: RhodesR (ed.) Transforming British Government, pp.46-62. London: Macmillan.
9.
BusquetGHérouardFSaint-MacaryE (2016) La Politique de la ville. Idéologies, acteurs et territoires. Paris: l’Harmattan.
10.
CasadoVHueteMAMerineroRGonzález-MedinaM (2018) La influencia de la iniciativa URBANA 2007-2013 en el desarrollo de la capacidad institucional de la administración municipal. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas19. DOI: 10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10487.
11.
ChorianopoulosIIosifidesT (2006) The neoliberal framework of EU urban policy in action: supporting competitiveness and reaping disparities. Local Economy21(4): 409–422.
D’AlbergoE (2010) Urban issues in nation-state agendas: a comparison in Western Europe. Urban Research & Practice3(2): 138–158.
14.
De Gregorio HurtadoS (2017a) 25 years of urban regeneration in the EU, Introduction to special issue on Urban Regeneration in the EU. Territory of Research on Settlements and Environment (TRIA)18(1): 15–19.
15.
De Gregorio HurtadoS (2012) Urban Policies of the European Union from the perspective of Collaborative Planning: the URBAN (1994-1999) and URBAN II (2000-2006) community initiatives in Spain. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid.
16.
De Gregorio HurtadoS (2017b) Is EU Urban Policy transforming Urban Regeneration in Spain? Answers from an analysis of the Iniciativa Urbana (2007-2013). Cities60, Part A: 402–414.
17.
De Gregorio HurtadoS (2010) El desarrollo de las Iniciativas Comunitarias URBAN y URBAN II en las periferias degradadas de las ciudades españolas. Una contribución a la práctica de la regeneración urbana en España. Ciudades13: 39–59.
18.
De Gregorio HurtadoS (2018) The EU urban policy in the period 2007-2013: lessons from the Spanish experience. Regional Studies, Regional Science5(1): 212–230.
19.
Del CastilloJHaarichS (2013) Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible cofinanciado por el FEDER en España 2014-2020: Directrices Estratégicas y Prioridades de Inversión. Final Report for DG Regio.
20.
DossiS (2017) Cities and the European Union Mechanisms and Modes of Europeanisation. Colchester: ECPR Press.
21.
DukesTVan der WustenH (2014) Hesitant Europeanisation: two decades of practice in two city governments. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr105(5): 630–635.
22.
EU Ministers (2007) Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. Approved by the informal Council of Ministers for Urban Development, Leipzig, 24 May.
23.
EU Ministers (2008) Marseille declaration. Approved by the informal Council of Ministers for Urban Development, Marseille, 25 November.
24.
EU Ministers (2016) Urban agenda for the EU: pact of Amsterdam. Approved by the informal Council of Ministers for Urban Matter, Amsterdam, 3 June.
European Commission (EC) (2011) Cities of Tomorrow: Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward. Brussels: EC.
28.
González-MedinaMFedeliV (2015) Exploring European urban policy: towards an EU-national urban agenda? Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 14, July–December. Available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281543007002 (accessed 21 February 2018).
29.
González-MedinaMHuete GarcíaMA (2019) Real innovation in urban planning? Assessing the institutional capacity in the frame of the integrated sustainable urban development programmes. European Planning Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1675601.
30.
González-MedinaM (2013) La europeización urbana a través de la política de cohesión. Revista CIDOB D’afers Internacionals104: 133–154.
31.
HallPA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics25(3): 275–296.
32.
HamedingerABartikHWolffhardtA (2008) The Impact of EU Area-based Programmes on Local Governance: Towards a Europeanisation’?Urban Studies45(13):2669-2687.
33.
HamedingerAWolffhardtA (eds) (2010) The Europeanization of Cities. Policies, Urban Change & Urban Networks. Amsterdam: Techne Press.
34.
Huete GarcíaMAMerinero RodríguezRMuñoz MorenoR (2016) Urban regeneration policy from the Model of Integrated Urban Development in the European Union: an analytical approach based on the study of Spanish cities. Local Government Studies42(2): 267–286.
35.
HugginsC (2018) Subnational government and transnational networking: the rationalist logic of local level Europeanization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies56(6): 1263–1282.
36.
JohnP (2000) The Europeanization of sub-national governance. Urban Studies37(5–6): 877–894.
37.
JohnP (2001) Local Governance in Western Europe. London: SAGE.
38.
JordanALiefferinkD (2003) The Europeanization of national environmental policy: a comparative analysis. In: European Union Studies Association 8th biennial international conference, Nashville, TN, 27–29 March.
39.
KernK (2007) When Europe hits city hall: the Europeanization of cities in the EU multi-level system. In: Biennial conference of the European Studies Association, 17-19 May, 2007, Montreal, QC, Canada.
40.
MarshallAJ (2005) Europeanisation at the urban level: local actors, institutions, and the dynamics of multilevel interaction. Journal of European Public Policy12(4): 668–686.
41.
MorganD (2008) Snowball sampling. In: GivenL (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. London: SAGE, pp. 816–817.
42.
NavarroCRamírezA (2005) Una propuesta para el análisis de la acción de los gobiernos locales, en Revista de Estudios Políticos (nueva época), 128, April-June, pp.161-177.
43.
OECD (2017) National Urban Policies in OECD Countries, Paris: France.
44.
OlsenJ (2002) The many faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies40(5): 921–952.
45.
ParkinsonMDe Gregorio HurtadoSLefèvreC (2012) National policy Spain. Second Tier Cities and Territorial Development in Europe: Performance, Policies and Prospects (SGPTD ESPON project). Scientific Report, pp. 173–200. Luxembourg: ESPON.
46.
PayreR (2010) The importance of being connected: city networks and urban government. Lyon and Eurocities (1990–2005). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(2): 260–280.
47.
PeckJTheodoreNBrennerN (2009) Neoliberal urbanism: models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs29(1): 49–66.
48.
PickvanceCG (2001) Four varieties of comparative analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment16(1): 7–28.
49.
PickvanceCG (2005) The four varieties of comparative analysis: the case of environmental regulation. Paper for conference on small and large-N comparative solutions, University of Sussex, 22–23 September.
50.
PrzeworskiATeuneH (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
51.
RadaelliC (2003) The Europeanization of public policy. In: FeatherstoneKRadaelliC (eds) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.
52.
RaginCC (2014) The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
SykesOSchulze BäingA (2017) Regional and territorial development policy after the 2016 EU referendum–initial reflections and some tentative scenarios. Local Economy32(3): 240–256.
54.
TortolaPD (2012) Federalism, the state and the city: explaining urban policy institutions in the United States and in the European Union. PhD Thesis, Oxford University, Oxford.
55.
UN-Habitat (2014) The Evolution of National Urban Policies. Nairobi, Kenya: UN Human Settlements Programme.
56.
Van den BrandeL (2014) Multilevel governance and partnership (The Van den Brande Report). Prepared at the request of the Commissioner for Regional and Urban Policy Johannes Hahn, October.
57.
VerhelstT (2017) Processes and patterns of urban Europeanisation: evidence from the EUROCITIES network. Territory of Research on Settlements and Environment10(1): 75–96.
58.
YinR (1989) Case Study Research. London: SAGE.
59.
ZerbinatiS (2004) Europeanization and EU funding in Italy and England: a comparative local perspective. Journal of European Public Policy11(6): 1000–1019.
