This paper deals with knowledge flows and collaboration between firms in the regional innovation system of southern Sweden. The aim is to analyse how the functional and spatial organization of knowledge interdependencies among firms and other actors varies between different types of industries that draw on different types of knowledge bases. We use data from three case studies of firm clusters in the region: (1) the life science cluster represents an analytical (science-based) industry, (2) the food cluster includes mainly synthetic (engineering-based) industries, and (3) the moving media cluster is considered to be symbolic (artistic based). Knowledge sourcing and knowledge exchange in each of the cases are explored and compared using social network analysis in association with data gathered through interviews with firm representatives. Our findings reveal that knowledge exchange in geographical proximity is especially important for industries that rely on a symbolic or synthetic knowledge base, because the interpretation of the knowledge they deal with tends to differ between places. This is less the case for industries drawing on an analytical knowledge base, which rely more on scientific knowledge that is codified, abstract and universal and are therefore less sensitive to geographical distance. Thus, geographical clustering of firms in analytical industries builds on rationales other than the need for proximity for knowledge sourcing.
AsheimBT (1996) Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A condition for prosperity. European Planning Studies4(4): 379–400.
2.
AsheimBT (2007) Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research20(3): 223–241.
3.
AsheimBTCoenenL (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy34(8): 1173–1190.
4.
AsheimBTCoenenL (2006) Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. Journal of Technology Transfer31(1): 163–173.
5.
AsheimBTGertlerMS (2005) The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In: FagerbergJMoweryDCNelsonRR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291–317.
6.
AsheimBTHansenHK (2009) Knowledge bases, talents and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography85(4): 425–442.
7.
AsheimBTCoenenLVangJ (2007) Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25(5): 655–670.
8.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP (2004) Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography28(1): 31–56.
9.
BoschmaR (2005) Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies39(1): 61–74.
10.
BoschmaRIammarinoS (2009) Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography85(3): 289–311.
11.
BoschmaRErikssonRLindgrenU (2009) How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants: The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography9(2): 169–190.
12.
BunninNYuJ (2004) Begging the question. In: BunninNYuJ (eds) The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
13.
CamagniR. (1991) Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London and New York: Belhaven Press.
14.
CantnerUGrafH (2006) The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy35(4): 463–480.
15.
CoenenLMoodyssonJRyanCDAsheimBPhillipsP (2006) Comparing a pharmaceutical and an agro-food bioregion: On the importance of knowledge bases for socio-spatial patterns of innovation. Industry & Innovation13(4): 393–414.
16.
CookePHeidenreichMBraczykHJ (2004) Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge.
17.
CookePUrangaMGEtxebarriaG (1998) Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A30(9): 1563–1584.
18.
CowanRDavidPForayD (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change9(2): 211–253.
19.
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffL (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. London: Pinter.
20.
FeldmanMP (2000) Location and innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration. In: ClarkGLFeldmanMPGertlerMS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 373–394.
21.
GertlerMS (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography3(1): 75–99.
22.
GertlerMS (2008) Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context. In: AminARobertsJ (eds) Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 203–226.
23.
GertlerMSLevitteYM (2005) Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry & Innovation12(4): 487–507.
24.
GiulianiE (2007) The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography7(3): 139–168.
25.
HagedoornJ (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy31(4): 477–492.
26.
HansenTWintherL (2011) Innovation, regional development and relations between high- and low-tech industries. European Urban and Regional Studies18: 321–339.
27.
HenningMMoodyssonJNilssonM (2010) Innovation och regional omvandling – Från skånska kluster till nya kombinationer. Malmö: Region Skåne.
28.
IsaksenAOnsagerK (2010) Regions, networks and innovative performance: The case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway. European Urban and Regional Studies17: 227–243.
29.
JohnsonBLorenzELundvallB-Å (2002) Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge?Industrial and Corporate Change11(2): 245–262.
30.
KlineSJRosenbergN (1986) An overview of innovation. In: LandauRRosenbergN (eds) The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 275–305.
31.
KnokeDYangS (2008) Social Network Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
KrätkeS (2010) Regional Knowledge Networks: A Network Analysis Approach To the Interlinking of Knowledge Resources. European Urban and Regional Studies17: 83–97.
33.
LaestadiusS (2000) Biotechnology and the potential for a radical shift of technology in forest industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management12(2): 193–212.
LundvallB-ÅJohnsonB (1994) The learning economy. Industry & Innovation1(2): 23–42.
36.
LundvallB-ÅJohnsonBAndersenESDalumB (2002) National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy31(2): 213–231.
37.
McKelveyMAlmHRiccaboniM (2003) Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector?Research Policy32(3): 483–501.
38.
MalmbergAMaskellP (2002) The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environment and Planning A34(3): 429–449.
39.
MalmbergAMaskellP (2006) Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change37(1): 1–18.
40.
MarshallA (1920) Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
41.
MartinRMoodyssonJ (2011) Innovation in symbolic industries: The geography and organisation of knowledge sourcing. European Planning Studies19(7): 1183–1203.
42.
MoodyssonJ (2007) Sites and Modes of Knowledge Creation: On the Spatial Organization of Biotechnology Innovation. Lund: Lund University.
43.
MoodyssonJ (2008) Principles and practices of knowledge creation: On the organization of ‘buzz’ and ‘pipelines’ in life science communities. Economic Geography84(4): 449–469.
44.
MoodyssonJCoenenLAsheimB (2008) Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: Analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environment and Planning A40(5): 1040–1056.
45.
MorrisonA (2008) Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts: Who they are, how they interact. Regional Studies42(2): 817–835.
46.
MorrisonARabellottiR (2009) Knowledge and information networks in an Italian wine cluster. European Planning Studies17(7): 983–1006.
47.
NeffkeFHenningM (2010) Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference2010, London.
48.
NelsonRRWinterSG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
NightingaleP (1998) A cognitive model of innovation, Research Policy27(7): 698–709.
50.
NilssonM (2008) A Tale of Two Clusters: Sharing Resources to Compete. Lund: Lund Business Press.
51.
NilssonMSvensson-HenningMWilkensonO (2002) Skånska kluster och profilområden – en kritisk granskning. Malmö: Region Skåne.
52.
NonakaIToyamaRKonnoN (2000) SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning33(1): 5–34.
53.
Owen-SmithJPowellW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science15(1): 5–21.
54.
PavittK (2005) Innovation processes. In: FagerbergJMoweryDNelsonR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 86–114.
55.
PlumOHassinkR (2011) On the nature and geography of innovation and interactive learning: A case study of the biotechnology industry in the Aachen technology region, Germany, European Planning Studies19(7): 1141–1164.
56.
PlumOHassinkR (2013) Analysing the knowledge base configuration that drives southwest Saxony’s automotive firms, European Urban and Regional Studies20(2): 206–226.
57.
PolanyiM (1967) The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
58.
PorterM (2003) The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies37(6): 545–546.
59.
PowellWWGrodalS (2005) Networks of innovators. In: FagerbergJMoweryDCNelsonRR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–85.
60.
Ter WalABoschmaR (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. Annals of Regional Science43(3): 739–756.
61.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
