Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Abortion is one of the great moral debates of the epoch. Is there a rational method by which the debate can be resolved? Can bioethics' promise of such a method be fulfilled? Surely, a strictly rational approach can establish solid grounds for our beliefs once and for all. We would then be justified in deeming as unreasonable anyone who does not accept the perfectly rational conclusions. I present two scenarios to show that there can be no such philosophically grounded method and therefore no such facts to which everyone must agree. This does not mean that it is in fact impossible for people to reach agreement. It simply means that there is no incontrovertibly rational means by which they must do so.

Keywords

abortion bioethics conception disagreement embryo fetus rationality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Singer P. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1979: 106-126.

2 Rachels J. The end of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1986.

3 Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide. In: Singer P ed. Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1986: 57-85.

4 Hunt G . Death, medicine and bioethics . Theor Med 1994; 15: 371-387 .

5 Maclean A . The elimination of morality. London: Routledge , 1993.

6 Glover J . Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin , 1977: 119-149.

7 Engelhardt HT . Introduction. In: Bondeson WB , Engelhardt HT , Spicker SF , Winship DH eds. Abortion and the status of thefetus. Dordrecht: Reidel , 1984: i-xxxv.

8 Ramsey P. The morality of abortion. In: Labby DH ed. Life or death: ethics and options. London: Macmillan , 1968. Reprinted in Rachels J ed. Moral problems, second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1975.

9 Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide . Philos Publ Affairs 1972; 2: 37-65 .

10.

10 Lockwood M. Moral dilemmas in modern medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 1985: 9-31.

11.

11 Pence GE . Classic cases in medical ethics. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1990: 118-119.

Abortion: Why Bioethics Can Have No Answer – A Personal Perspective

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References