Nurses in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) play a pivotal role in managing ethically complex care for infants at the threshold of viability. However, institutional hierarchies, policies, and relational dynamics may constrain nurses’ ability to voice concerns and influence decisions, contributing to moral distress and moral residue.
Aim
To explore how NICU nurses experience and enact moral agency under constraint during threshold-of-viability decision-making, and how these experiences shape moral distress and moral residue.
Research design
Hermeneutic phenomenological study, reported in accordance with COREQ guidelines.
Setting/Participants
A purposive maximum-variation sample of 28 registered nurses (≥12 months of NICU experience) was recruited from four Level III NICUs in one administrative region of the country.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely via videoconferencing in Arabic or English, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Arabic transcripts were translated and verified through back-translation to ensure semantic and conceptual equivalence. Data were analysed using hermeneutic phenomenological thematic analysis, supported by NVivo.
Ethical considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant university institutional review board and participating clinical sites. Written informed consent was obtained, and confidentiality was ensured through pseudonymization and secure data management.
Findings
Four themes captured nurses’ ethical experience: (1) Navigating the Grey Zone: The Weight of Ambiguity; (2) Voiceless at the Bedside: Structural Constraints on Moral Agency; (3) The Insider–Outsider Paradox: Peripheral Participation in Ethical Deliberation; and (4) The Lingering Echo: Moral Residue and Its Professional Toll.
Conclusions
Nurses’ moral distress at the threshold of viability was closely linked to constrained moral agency in hierarchical, policy-bound decision-making environments. Strengthening nursing inclusion in ethical deliberation and embedding structured post-case debriefing are plausible organisational strategies to reduce cumulative moral residue.
SakaiMTanakaKNagataK, et al.Moral distress in the neonatal intensive care unit experienced by nurses caring for critically ill neonates: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs [Internet]2025; 81(7): 4160–4171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16625
2.
QuKYZhuDJYangPF, et al.Moral distress of intensive care unit nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nurs [Internet]2026; 25(1): 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04274-4
3.
LordKMBoyceHFortierMA, et al.Increasing parental well‐being after the neonatal intensive care unit through relational savoring. Fam Process [Internet]2026; 65(2): e70152. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70152
WongVHassanNWongYP, et al.Nurses’ adherence to ethical principles – a qualitative study. Nurs Ethics [Internet]2025; 32(4): 1162–1176. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241291159
Murless-CollinsSEzeakaVCMasoudNS, et al.Born too soon: care for small and sick newborns, evidence for investment and implementation. Reprod Health [Internet]2025; 22(S2): 114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-02032-y
LeanRERogersCEPaulRA, et al.Long-term implications on parenting and child behaviors. Curr Treat options Pediatr2018; 4(1): 49–69. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29881666
AghakhaniNEwalds-KvistBMAghakhaniS, et al.Navigating ethical challenges: the role of moral distress, sensitivity, and resilience in the nursing profession. Sage Open Nurs [Internet]2025; 11: 23779608251348833. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251348833
FantusSColeRUssetTJ, et al.Multi-professional perspectives to reduce moral distress: a qualitative investigation. Nurs Ethics2024; 31(8): 1513–1523. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230519
17.
Abou El FadlDKAlyYAFDarweeshEAG, et al.Assessment of neonatal intensive care unit nurses’ compliance with standard precautions of infection control and identification of enabling factors. Futur J Pharm Sci [Internet]2023; 9(1): 6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-022-00456-y
18.
KuiperJRBembeaMGaynorJW, et al.Exposed and vulnerable: sources and health implications of chemical exposures in neonatal, pediatric, and cardiac intensive care units. Curr Environ Health Rep2025; 12(1): 11. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00477-8
MillikenA. Refining moral agency: insights from moral psychology and moral philosophy. Nurs Philos [Internet]2018; 19(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12185
MorleyGSankaryLR. Re‐examining the relationship between moral distress and moral agency in nursing. Nurs Philos [Internet]2024; 25(1): e12419. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12419
24.
XuXWangYMengJ, et al.The relationship between moral sensitivity, missed nursing care and moral distress among new nurses: a cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs [Internet]2025; 34(6):2262–2275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17420
25.
BakırlıoğluBÇetinkayaBTekiRN. Missed nursing care and its causes and effects on moral distress in neonatal intensive care nurses. Nurs Crit Care2025; 30(2): e13284. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13284
26.
BuchbinderMBrowneABerlingerN, et al.Moral stress and moral distress: confronting challenges in healthcare systems under pressure. Am J Bioeth2024; 24(12): 8–22. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2224270
27.
MandrellBBoggsJGattusoJ, et al.Moral distress and moral stress among nurses facing challenges in a health care system under pressure. Am J Bioeth2024; 24(12): 48–51. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2417992
BarrPMoral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress in NICU nurses. Nurs Ethics [Internet]2025; 32(2): 636–647. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262468
ŠpoljarDJankovićSVrkićD, et al.Ethics and end-of-life in pediatric and neonatal ICUs: a systematic review of recommendations. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24(1): 36. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01636-8
32.
BeadleESWaleckaASangamAV, et al.Triggers and factors associated with moral distress and moral injury in health and social care workers: a systematic review of qualitative studies. In: ClarkN, (ed). PLoS One [Internet]2024; 19(6): e0303013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303013
33.
CarterACCarterBS. The ethical rationale for comprehensive neonatal intensive care unit Follow-Up. In: DeemMJLinglerJH (eds). Nursing Ethics [Internet]: Oxford University PressNew, 2024, pp. 200–214. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/58117/chapter/479641434
EpsteinEGHamricAB. Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. J Clin Ethics [Internet]2009; 20(4): 330–342. Available from: https://doi.org/10.10.1086/JCE200920406
RushtonCH. Creating a culture of ethical practice in health care delivery systems. Hastings Cent Rep [Internet]2016; 46(S1), Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.628
43.
ShoaibABVawter-LeeMVenkatesanC, et al.Muslim perspectives on palliative care in perinatal and neonatal patients: a mini-review. Front Pediatr2023; 11: 1204941. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1204941
44.
AlfahmiMZ. Patients’ preference approach to overcome the moral implications of family-centred decisions in Saudi medical settings. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]2022; 23(1): 128. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00868-8
45.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qual Health Res [Internet]2016; 26(13): 1753–1760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
46.
SaundersBSimJKingstoneT, et al.Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quantity2018; 52(4): 1893–1907. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
47.
MirzayevE. Backtranslation as a quality control tool in translation studies: challenges and practical insights. Glob Spectr Res Humanit [Internet]2025; 2(3): 42–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0203025005
48.
YunusNAolde HartmanTLucassenP, et al.Reporting of the translation process in qualitative health research: a neglected importance. Int J Qual Methods2022; 21: 16094069221145282, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221145282
49.
AlruwailiANAlshammariAMAlhaitiA, et al.Neonatal nurses’ experiences with generative AI in clinical decision-making: a qualitative exploration in high-risk nicus. BMC Nurs [Internet]2025; 24(1): 386. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03044-6
50.
LoveBVetereADavisP. Should interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) be used with focus groups? Navigating the bumpy road of “Iterative Loops,” Idiographic Journeys, and “Phenomenological Bridges.”. Int J Qual Methods2020; 19: 1609406920921600. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920921600
MishraSDeyAK. Understanding and identifying ‘themes’ in qualitative case study research2022; 11(3): 187–192. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221134659
53.
ColeR. Inter-rater reliability methods in qualitative case study research. Socio Methods Res2024; 53(4): 1944–1975. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231156971
54.
HalpinSN. Inter-coder agreement in qualitative coding: considerations for its use. Am J Qual Res2024; 8(3): 23–43. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14887
NaeemMOzuemWHowellK, et al.A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods [Internet]2023; 22: 16094069231205789. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
BinghamAJ. From data management to actionable findings: a five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods [Internet]2023; 22: 16094069231183620. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
DriskoJW. Transferability and generalization in qualitative research. Res Soc Work Pract2025;35(1):102–110. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241256560
63.
HoKHMCheungDSKBourkeS, et al.Reflexivity in heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology: the hermeneutic phenomenological circle. J Adv Nurs [Internet]2025; 0: 1–9, Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16950
64.
Olmos-VegaFMStalmeijerREVarpioL, et al.A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Med Teach2023; 45(3): 241–251. [Internet]Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057287
65.
JamiesonMKGovaartGHPownallM. Reflexivity in quantitative research: a rationale and beginner’s guide. Soc Personal Psychol Compass2023; 17(4): e12735, [Internet]Availablefrom: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735
66.
MorleyG. What is “moral distress” in nursing? How, can and should we respond to it?J Clin Nurs [Internet]2018; 27(19–20): 3443–3445. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14332
67.
GrimellJNilssonS. An advanced perspective on moral challenges and their health-related outcomes through an integration of the moral distress and moral injury theories. Mil Psychol [Internet]2020; 32(6): 380–388. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2020.1794478
68.
Van Mersbergen-de BruinMVan OostveenCWeggelaar-JansenAM. Nurses’ challenges and strategies for safeguarding care quality and safety: a qualitative study on situated resilience. Int J Nurs Stud Adv [Internet]2025; 9: 100365, Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666142X25000724
69.
PitcherCSlemonADandaM. Reconceptualizing advocacy: a novel model for nursing theory and practice. Nurs Inq2025; 32(3): e70036, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.70036
70.
HansonEChampeixC. Informal caregivers: the advocacy and policy perspective. In: Informal Caregivers: From Hidden Heroes to Integral Part of Care: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 173–188. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16745-4_10
71.
AdamsSYFryJTHennerN. What is culture made of? An exploratory study of ethical cultures and provider perspectives on the care of periviable neonates. Am J Perinatol2025; 42(04): 502–510. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-3336
DevireddyKShuklaRBorenR, et al.Reducing moral distress through interdisciplinary collaboration: the impact of a weekly palliative care and neonatology conference. BMC Palliat Care2025; 24(1): 284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01915-y
KosmützkyANokkalaTDiogoS. Between context and comparability: exploring new solutions for a familiar methodological challenge in qualitative comparative research. High Educ Q [Internet]2020; 74(2): 176–192. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12255
